> I have noticed that a mail from me, posted to linux-hams
> takes about 1-2 days before it ends up on the list.
> Can someone do something about this?
Maybe, maybe not.
VGER is now running with load-average of 10-15 all the time,
and about half of the active processes are anon-cvs server
related. The machine is not a very hot-shot one, and it
is overworking itself now :-/ The mailer has input queue
of 4000+ messages right now, and it is getting only about
1/10th of CPU time to do its work.
> Joop
> --
> Joop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Hamradio Applications and Utilities Homepage
> http://www.casema.net/~aba
/Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Bob Nielsen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Joop Stakenborg
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Joop Stakenborg
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Tim Connolly
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Karl F. Larsen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Matti Aarnio
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Ronnie Hale
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Bob Snyder
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Matti Aarnio
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Alex Holden
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Dirk Koopman
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Hamish Moffatt
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Bob Snyder
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Tim Connolly
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Thomas M.
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Duvall, Michael J.
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Alex Holden
- linux-hams is sloooooow.. Mike Bilow
