On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Matti Aarnio wrote: > Maybe, maybe not. > VGER is now running with load-average of 10-15 all the time, > and about half of the active processes are anon-cvs server > related. The machine is not a very hot-shot one, and it > is overworking itself now :-/ The mailer has input queue > of 4000+ messages right now, and it is getting only about > 1/10th of CPU time to do its work. Can't it just be upgraded? I'm sure a plea on /. that the primary Linux mail server needs replacing would bring plenty of charitable offers... --------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. -------------- : Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham : -------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Joop Stakenborg
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Heikki Hannikainen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Joop Stakenborg
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Tim Connolly
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Karl F. Larsen
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Matti Aarnio
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Ronnie Hale
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Bob Snyder
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Matti Aarnio
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Alex Holden
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Dirk Koopman
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Hamish Moffatt
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Bob Snyder
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Tim Connolly
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Thomas M.
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Duvall, Michael J.
- Re: linux-hams is sloooooow.. Alex Holden
- linux-hams is sloooooow.. Mike Bilow
