On 15 Apr, Bruce O. Benson wrote:
> Ok, which was it? Eric taking too much credit or my poor memory? If my
> description is confused, then why are you deriving an inference from it
> to bash someone else?
I don't whether your description is confused.
Only you can know what Eric actually told you :)
I wasn't bashing Eric, I was bashing you with Eric :)
> Because they're non-mainstream?
The answer to that question relates directly to why I think we should
be looking for an alternate delivery mechanism for the information in
the HAM-HOWTO. The volume of LDP documentation is growing large enough
that non-mainstream documentation will soon not be distributed as we've
become accustomed. We're being marginalised by the new non-techhnical
mass Linux user being introduced from the mainstream market.
Sorry if I sounded annoyed, I'm not. I'm just busy and time is short, I
didn't see how whether the document was in SGML or not made any
difference in solving the core problem.
Terry
--
Linux: standard and fully integrated support for Amateur Radio protocols
"Penguinitis is contagious". http://www.linux.org.au/
