According to Bob Snyder: While burning my CPU.
> 
> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Tomi Manninen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Richard Adams wrote:
> > 
> > > BTW;
> > > Your ReplyTo header is [EMAIL PROTECTED] not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > As is yours. Seems that someone has made some changes to the list software
> > configuration.
> 
> I was asked to do so by a subscriber, and was actually somewhat suprised
> it wasn't already on. I tend to prefer to set reply-to:'s on mailing lists
> so that by default responses go back to the list to further discussion.
> Many MUA (OK, at least one: pine) give you the option of using the
> Reply-To: or not.

Elm alows manipulation of headers, so i have no objection.

> 
> If there's strong opposition, I can easily pull it back out, but your
> comments are the first in around a week of it being on.

Really its a good idea, it will just take some getting used to, nothing more.

Thanks for your time and consideration to explane.

> 
> Bob N2KGO
> listowner, linux-hams
> 


-- 
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to