According to Bob Snyder: While burning my CPU.
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Tomi Manninen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Richard Adams wrote:
> >
> > > BTW;
> > > Your ReplyTo header is [EMAIL PROTECTED] not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > As is yours. Seems that someone has made some changes to the list software
> > configuration.
>
> I was asked to do so by a subscriber, and was actually somewhat suprised
> it wasn't already on. I tend to prefer to set reply-to:'s on mailing lists
> so that by default responses go back to the list to further discussion.
> Many MUA (OK, at least one: pine) give you the option of using the
> Reply-To: or not.
Elm alows manipulation of headers, so i have no objection.
>
> If there's strong opposition, I can easily pull it back out, but your
> comments are the first in around a week of it being on.
Really its a good idea, it will just take some getting used to, nothing more.
Thanks for your time and consideration to explane.
>
> Bob N2KGO
> listowner, linux-hams
>
--
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]