The question of the "reply-to" may be in the header of this posting- there
are two different addresses for the "reply-to" info. I have used the
"forward" option to let the headers show, as recieved. In fact, there are
so many addresses, I'm confused.
Bill
>From: Richard Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: mru
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 11:32:21 +0000 (GMT)
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-hams-outgoing
>
>According to Bob Snyder: While burning my CPU.
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Tomi Manninen wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Richard Adams wrote:
>> >
>> > > BTW;
>> > > Your ReplyTo header is [EMAIL PROTECTED] not
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > As is yours. Seems that someone has made some changes to the list
software
>> > configuration.
>>
>> I was asked to do so by a subscriber, and was actually somewhat suprised
>> it wasn't already on. I tend to prefer to set reply-to:'s on mailing lists
>> so that by default responses go back to the list to further discussion.
>> Many MUA (OK, at least one: pine) give you the option of using the
>> Reply-To: or not.
>
>Elm alows manipulation of headers, so i have no objection.
>
>>
>> If there's strong opposition, I can easily pull it back out, but your
>> comments are the first in around a week of it being on.
>
>Really its a good idea, it will just take some getting used to, nothing more.
>
>Thanks for your time and consideration to explane.
>
>>
>> Bob N2KGO
>> listowner, linux-hams
>>
>
>
>--
>Regards Richard.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
Bill Aycock --- Persimmon Hill
Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
(in the N.E. corner of the State)
W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
