On Tue, 07 Dec 1999, you wrote:
>
> I investigated this last week and was able to come up with a possible
> solution to the problem, which seems to be an oversight in the kernel
> code.
>
> Would people please test the attached patch to linux/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
> (even if you haven't noticed any adverse effects or don't use modules at
> all) and send success and/or failure reports to the list or directly to
> me. Obvliously the patch is against 2.2.13.
>
> For more details see the Dev-Hams list archives at
> <http://www.hes.iki.fi/archive/dev-hams/>.
Hello Tomi.
I presume you have seen that 2.2.14pre12 is out and part of the patch is
incorperated, however only the first line has been deleted, is that correct.?
BTW;
2.2.14pre11 has been running for about 10 hours with the patch compiled in and
i have had numours connects, nothing different is to bee seen.
>
> --
> Tomi Manninen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> OH2BNS AX.25: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> KP20ME04 Amprnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
----------------------------------------
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; name="af_ax25.c.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-Description:
----------------------------------------
--
Regards Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/
