Gerard, F6FGZ, wrote: > At this point of the debate, one can see we have two kinds of logging > software: > (1) One for DXer, ragchewer or casual ops. > (2) One for contesters ops, competitor or casual. There is a good chance a DXer would also be a casual contester, wanting to use their normal logging software to 'hand out points' on a Sunday afternoon. The casual contester probably also belongs in category (1). In my view, building competitive (bells & whistles) contest software is unrealistic for several reasons. But adding the basic CW features mentioned previously would make it useful to category 1 CW ops. Even if not implemented, it would be good to have a modular approach allowing those features to be added later on. I am going to have a look at the logging s/ware listed by Hans-Peter (tnx). Wilbert, ZL2BSJ
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Ken Koster
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Ken Koster
- Re: Log Program for Linux Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hans-Peter Zorn
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Gerard Parat
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Wilbert Knol
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hans-Peter Zorn
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Nate Bargmann
- Re: Log Program for Linux Wilbert Knol
- RE: Log Program for Linux Michael Anderson
- Re: Log Program for Linux Geoff Blake
- Re: Log Program for Linux Carl Makin
- Re: Log Program for Linux Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Log Program for Linux Andrew Hodges
