Gerard, F6FGZ,  wrote:

> At this point of the debate, one can see we have two kinds of logging
> software:
> (1) One for DXer, ragchewer or casual ops.
> (2) One for contesters ops, competitor or casual.

There is a good chance a DXer would also be a casual contester, wanting to 
use their normal logging software to 'hand out points' on a Sunday afternoon.
The casual contester probably also belongs in category (1).

In my view, building competitive (bells & whistles) contest software is 
unrealistic for several reasons.

But adding the basic CW features mentioned previously would make it useful 
to category 1 CW ops.

Even if not implemented, it would be good to have a modular approach 
allowing those features to be added later on.

I am going to have a look at the logging s/ware listed by Hans-Peter (tnx).

Wilbert, ZL2BSJ


Reply via email to