On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, voguemaster wrote: > > > >when i say something is bloated, i mean it takes too many resources. as > >you quite well know, two programs doing the same things can use different > >ammounts of resources. in fact, the same program can do the same thing in > >two manners - one optimized and one not. > > > > And what would you say were the minimum system requirements for Mozilla > to run with (not too sluggish) ??? > > I can tell you exactly how the computers in the CC at TAU are behaving > with IE (the computers in the basement). > The are all P2's I think, and most of them act sluggish as well with IE, so > I wouldn't just come to Mozilla with complaints.
On windows: try kmeleon. On macosx: try chimera. On linux: try skipstone (is it still developed?) or galeon. All of those use the same basic rendering engine ot display HTML, but avoid the unnecessary bloat of displaying the rest of the user interface with it. BTW: there is a recent project to try to produce an "slimmer" mozilla browser (though they seem to aim at size, and not at speed): phoenix. They may prove the previous paragraph wrong (or not...) -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
