On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

> On Sunday 26 October 2003 23:38, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> > The GPL, by design, is not a contract. As such, you must bring
> > yourself under its influence by wishing to distribute copyrighted
> > work for which the GPL was declared as a license.
>
> I'm not lawyer and I might be dead wrong here, but for the best of my
> knowledge, the GPL is a contract by all accounts. This specific
> contract states that if you abide by the terms specified in it then,
> and only then, you are given a license by the copyright which is a
> party to the contract to distribute the copyrighted work in question.
>
> The one thing which is special about this this contract is the fact that
> for a contract to be in force, one must prove among other things that
> the parties accept it's terms, hence contracts are usually signed so as
> to establish that both parties accept the terms.  With the GPL, however
> , this is not needed because only by accepting the terms of the
> contract and agreeing to be bound by it you can get the license to
> distribute the copyright work in question. The act of distributing the
> work implictly denotes acceptance of the terms of the GPL contract.

That's right.  If you happen not to accept the license, you
should follow the local copyright laws.

> Again: I am not lawyer and I might be dead wrong, but this is what I
> think I know about this stuff.
> Gilad.

behdad,

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to