Hi, 2008/5/22 Oron Peled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday, 22 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote: >> Quoting Mike Kemelmakher, from the post of Thu, 22 May: >> > I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial >> > product on Fedora is a bad idea. >> >> great. so we all agree. > I do Agree with Ira.
People, In Fedora world, things do change very fast, but does it means it has to be adopted by developers? How many developers needs EXT4? Pulse Audio? NetworkManager? The other packages are mostly back ported thanks to the fellows at LIVNA, EPEL, CentusPlus, KDE-Redhat, and probably one or two more. If someone wants the latest and greatest KDE & GNOME, he can find them in many place back-ported or someone at that company can run "rpmbuild -bb <SRPM file>" to recompile the stuff, not exactly a rocket science.. Ira, if KDevelop doesn't give you the stability that you are looking for, then use Eclipse. Not good? maybe it's time that this company want to pony-up some cash and buy Komodo or other commercial solution which is supported and works well on all Linuxes (Fedora, Ubuntu, Centos, SuSE, etc..). The price is not that high ($295) for a one time fee. I run 2 VM instances of Centos 5 and I use them a lot, with X and all those GUI stuff. I don't see any packages that are absolutely essential that are not available for Centos 5 or really hard to rebuild the RPMS. Care to point me to something *important* that's only available on Fedora and not found on Centos 5? (you do use rpm.pbone.net to search for those packages, right?) Thanks, Hetz
