Vicky Plaha wrote:
> I would like to second what Rohit says. Mr. Bhat, we
> need a more detailed write-up on your experience with
> Frame Buffered Server. We're waiting and watching...
>
> Vicky
>
> --- Rohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> > > I am trying the Frame Buffered server and it is
> > mind blowing. The
> > > performance parameters are really superb and no
> > CPU cycles are hogged.
> > > XFree86-4.0 is a must have to solve all UR X
> > hassles.
> >
> > Is that so? You will please write a longer mail,
> > intimating all of us
> > about your experiences with Linux. My particular
> > interests fall in the
> > following catagory...
> >
> > 1. Framebuffered X, can be equal to/faster than
> > XF86_SVGA for some well
> > supported graphics card?
> >
> > 2. What else positive experiences you have had.
> > 3. Can we totally do away with the graphics card?
> >
Sorry to ask such question But can i get some links as to what is
FrameBuffer .
What exactly caught my attention is "can we totally do away with graphics
card"?.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech. But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux. If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.
