>> If the driver was there, then why didn't you use it? >> So much for ease of install, huh... > > I think he was talking about windows not being able to use the driver > even though it was present. I've had the same problems. X runs at > 1024x768, but windows can't handle it.
Thats news... Thats what winDOZE is all about, I guess ;^) >> I wonder what a newbie would think when he is presented with the >> screen where he is asked to partition his drive, he would just run >> away from it. > Let the installer do the partitioning for you. That is an option you > know? You can let it be done automatically. True, very true... >> You miss the point again, does any Linux desktop system come anywhere >> close to winDOZE as far as usability goes? > > Mine does. My desktop is far far far more usable than any other > desktop. Not just for me, but for the absolute newbie as well. It > looks good too. Are you running a Macintosh?? :) >> Linux had been trying to give usability since the days of FVWM2 (I >> guess), and that was long before Mr. Steve Jobs and company came along >> (in 2001) and stunned the world with Mac OS X, which incidentally is >> again Unix _based_ >> What was the Linux community doing with all the lead time they had? > > If the Mac OS X guys would be so kind as to release their source code > instead of simply taking open source tools and using them... Theres a difference, how do you think a company would sustain growth without making money? Some how I can't bring myself to belive that Open Source can fill up stomachs. And even if it did, then the magnitude to which it would have if it had been closed source is too low. About the Mac OS X guys, well in return for using the open source tools, they have opened up their modifications/innovations to the Mach kernel, use it... ~Mayuresh _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
