"Binand Raj S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> w3's HTML rendering is better than that of lynx's, hence HTML emails show
> up better in emacs based mail clients than in mutt. I had tried to use
> links for text/html mails, but links doesn't have an option similar to
> -dump in lynx.

suresh (23:18:33 <~>) [500] ~$ grep html .mailcap
text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.htm; copiousoutput

w3m renders (say) tables far better - which helps with weirdly formatted
(and multiple top posted in HTML) outlook mails, without ruining the
formatting.

gnus on emacs, on the other hand, will render it happily - and then
jumble all the quoted text to an ugly mess thanks to its indentation.
This is with message-mode set - but no supercite (I hate supercite...)

    -srs

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian  <---->  mallet <at> efn dot org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to