* Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Josh Poimboeuf (57): > > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series. > > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...
Yes, please!
Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest
risk /
simplest towards highest risk / most complex.
Thanks,
Ingo
