* Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> wrote:
> You're right, that would be better. My apologies for spamming. It
> started with "only" 19 patches in v1 and then quickly got out of hand.
np!
> I may split it up something like this:
>
> cleanups:
> function graph fixes:
> get_stack_info():
> unwinder prep:
> unwinder:
> hardened usercopy:
> standardize the end of the stack:
> pt_regs frames:
> unwinder warnings:
Looks good to me, but please always keep only one of these series 'in flight' -
i.e. wait until it's been reviewed & applied before proceeding to the next
series.
That helps us keep all sane and relaxed!
Thanks,
Ingo
