On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:31:36 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Josh Poimboeuf (57): > > > > > > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series. > > > > > > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing > > > so > > > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve > > > maintainance... > > > > Yes, please! > > > > Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest > > risk / > > simplest towards highest risk / most complex. > > You're right, that would be better. My apologies for spamming. It > started with "only" 19 patches in v1 and then quickly got out of hand. > > I may split it up something like this: This looks fine. My wife came down to complain to me that my tablet was "popping" too much. (it pops for every email I get). But don't send these all at once. Send one series out and focus on that, then when that is all set, then work on the next series. -- Steve
