On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:39:35 +0200 Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Josh Poimboeuf (57): > > > > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series. > > > > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing > > so > > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve > > maintainance... > > Yes, please! > > Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest > risk / > simplest towards highest risk / most complex. > +1 -- Steve
