Em 07-06-2010 18:33, Helmut Auer escreveu: > Hello > >>> Now with kernel 2.6.34 this doesn't work anymore, because v4l-dvb doesn't >>> compile. >> >> Douglas returned from this 2 week trip abroad and he is backporting the >> upstream stuff. Yesterday, he >> reported to me that the tree is now compiling with 2.6.34. >> > Ok - I also got it compiling, but budget-ci is causing kernel oops (see other > ML thread)
There's already a patch for it at -git, but I suspect that Douglas didn't have time to backport the newer 87 patches that were committed there. >>> The final question for me: >>> Does it make any sense anymore to stay with v4l-dvb or do I have to change >>> to the kernel drivers ? >>> The major disadvantage of the kernel drivers is the fact that I cannot >>> switch to newer dvb drivers, I am stuck to the ones included in the kernel. >> >> Well, this is something that you need to answer by yourself ;) >> > Thats not what I wanted to hear ;) :) >> I don't recommend using a random snapshot of the tree on a distro package, >> as regressions may >> happen during the development period. >> >> Also, the backports are done at best efforts. There are no warranties, no QA >> and generally no >> tests with real hardware when a backport is done. So, while we hope that the >> backport will work, >> you may have a bug introduced on the backport stuff that may affect your >> card, not present >> upstream. >> >> IMHO, the better is to just upgrade to the next stable kernel. >> > Ok - that what I also thought > formerly v4l-dvb was the bleeding edge and the kernel draivers were about 2 > Versions behind. > Now the kernel drivers are often the newer ones, so I have to switch. There's still a delay if you're getting the latest stable kernel, that ranges from 1 to 2 versions for improvements, and a few weeks, for bug fixes. Eventually, you may provide -rc kernels as an alternative for those that needs the bleeding edge kernels and are brave enough ;) >> Another alternative is to manually apply on your distro the patches that you >> need there. >> All patches with c/c to sta...@kernel.org are bug fixes that needs to be >> backported to older >> (stable) kernels. So, a good hint is to check for those stable patches. >> Unfortunately, not all >> developers remind to add a c/c to stable. I try to do my best to re-tag >> those emails when >> sending the patches upstream, but I generally opt to trust on the >> developers, since a fix may >> apply only at the latest upstream kernel. >> > Thats surely an option, but an average user of my distri can't compile a > kernel ;) > Emerging v4l-dvb is much easier ;) Yes, but you may manually apply those patches from my git tree on your distro kernels. User will need to emerge the kernel package. It will require you a little more work, or some magic script. You may also keep using the -hg backport tree, but the delay is higher than before, since the patches go first to -git. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
