Linux-Misc Digest #369, Volume #19 Mon, 8 Mar 99 16:13:08 EST
Contents:
Re: Funny errors with fsck (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: KDevelop 0.3 released - an IDE for application development under Unix (Sandy
Meier)
Re: PPP connection ... Help ("Keith G. Murphy")
Re: new mb+cpu will it hose my linux? (Mark Tranchant)
Re: modutils for 2.2.2 (Mark Tranchant)
Re: UNIX/Linux book request for SysAdms (Keith Davey)
Re: ftp login failed with wu.ftp_2.4.2 (Dustin Fu)
Re: HELP! D drive disappeared after installed RedHat5.2 (fernando)
Re: hylafax (Koen de Boev�)
Startup... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Public license question (Barry Margolin)
GNU version of phigs for Linux (?) (Neil Zanella)
Re: Public license question (Barry Margolin)
Re: linux for beginers (Dennis)
Re: Public license question (David Kastrup)
Re: BEST HW For Linux NoteBook Project (Jonathan A. Buzzard)
Re: Cannot Remove LILO from MBR (Paul Sherwin)
PCI soundcard a possibility?? ("Janus N. T�ndering")
HELP: stuck with gcc & glibc (JK)
binary not found by bash (Milos Prudek)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Funny errors with fsck
Date: 8 Mar 99 15:47:16 GMT
Armin Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ha Ha Ha.... If I am not wrong it says right you're bonehead...
well to run e2fsck you need to dismount the disk or mount it as readolny
filesystem..
Again this olny works if I'm not wrong.....
: Hi all,
: I have a problem with the parallizing filesystem check (fsck) on
: all harddisks. These errors look like this:
: WARNING: Possible bug found in ext2fs! Or some bonehead (you!) is
: checking a mounted filesystem! (Of course I do NOT!)
: inode xxxx is 2 should be 2 fixed y
: .
: .
: When I try to check my filesystems manually with e2fsck all seems
: to be normal. So what's the problem?
: My system config:
: Kernel 2.0.36 (SuSe Kernel), SuSe 5.2 Distribution
: AMD K6/300 on a FIC VA503+ Mainboard with 64MB 100 Mhz SDRAM, MVP3 Chipset
: Harddisks: Samsung 1.6 GB, Seagate 2.5 GB, IBM 10 GB
: ...
: TIA
: Dark (Armin Kaiser)
:
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 18:56:25 GMT
On Fri, 05 Mar 1999 09:12:17 GMT, Mark Mokryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> >i can understand linus completely. do you remember 16 bit segment
>> >hell? i sure do. i never want to see that kind of brain damage ever
>> >again as long as i live. far pointers are a monumental crock. shame
>> >on you for even bringing it up!
>> >
>> >what would want a larger address space? most likely, it'd be a single
>> >massive program like a number cruncher or database application. you
>> >would have near and far 32 bit and 32+32 bit pointers. it would suck
>> >royally. it'd break all the assumptions that linux makes (basically
>> >all memory is accessible by a 32 bit pointer).
>> >
>> >if you need more address space, get a 64 cpu! for someone really
>> >needing the 36 bit space, the cost of an alpha or sparc is *not*
>> >prohibitive.
>>
>> It's fair enough for someone to want to build a 36 bit Linux port, so
>> long as they're willing to take responsibility for:
>> a) Writing it,
>> b) Rewriting GLIBC to use 36 bit values,
>> c) Creating a 36 bit distribution.
>
>The Xeon is not a "36-bit" machine, whatever that is... It merely has a
>36-bit physical address bus. The extended address space is achieved via
>modifications to page table entries, i.e. it is a question of how the CPU
>interprets the PTE's. The CPU can be switched between the different paging
>modes. The Xeon, like all x86's, is a 32-bit machine. For the large part, the
>code needing modification is kernel code that deals with physical addresses.
>Depending on the architecture of Linux (which I am not familiar with), this
>may or may not be a ton of work. But in any case, from what I've heard in
>this discussion, Linux cannot even utilize more than 1 or 2 GB (depending who
>you ask) of physical memory, on ANY architecture. Why? This will seriously
>hurt Linux in the server arena.
>
>-Mark
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
I look at it this way. 99% of the i386 arch all the way to the pent
II has a 1-2 gig memory limit. Dispite the 4 gig addressability of
the CPU, the chipset will only allow up to 1 gig. more than that is
ignored and is inaccessable because of the chipset. You want more
memory, use a computer that can handle more memory instead of
complaining about no support for something the hardware can't even do.
Our new pent II we sell are only upgradeable to 1 gig. My pent MMX is
only ipgradeable to 512 meg and my pent classic(old socet 7) will only
go 384 meg and my socet 5 board will only hold 128 meg ram.
out servers only have 32-64 meg ram and hold the load just fine. (file
+ web + e-mail all in one server usenet news on another)
to actually NEED that kind of memory, you must have some serious data
to crunch. our news server /w 64 meg ram runs our news server going
through 3 gigs a day and keeps up no prob...
top
12:41pm up 43 days, 23:38, 2 users, load average: 2.85, 2.93, 3.08
36 processes: 35 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 1.7% user, 2.5% system, 0.0% nice, 96.1% idle
Mem: 63160K av, 61944K used, 1216K free, 6488K shrd, 7672K buff
Swap: 76068K av, 7948K used, 68120K free 4000K cached
<waited a minute>
uptime
12:42pm up 43 days, 23:39, 2 users, load average: 3.80, 3.19, 3.16
this is the beauty of linux. You don't need as much memory as the
other OS(nt) which crashed every 2 days doing web + e-mail which
isn't nearly 1/24 the load as news. MS said you needed more RAM to
get it stable under those loads.
linux even has time to spare, just look at that idle time. if you
NEED 1 gig ram, you NEED an alpha
tng
------------------------------
From: Sandy Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: KDevelop 0.3 released - an IDE for application development under Unix
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:09:19 +0100
Hi!
> I find it interesting that KDevelop claims to be "compliant to the FSF
> standards;" in browsing <http://www.fsf.org/prep/standards_toc.html>
> and comparing it to what's at the KDevelop web site, it notably
> doesn't seem that KDevelop provides functionality relating to the
> standards described at:
>
> <http://www.fsf.org/prep/standards_28.html> concerning the use of
> TeXInfo for documentation;
Ok, its in argument.
> <http://www.fsf.org/prep/standards_40.html> concerning the structure
> surrounding the creation of "configure";
The generated applications support this standard!!!
>
> <http://www.fsf.org/prep/standards_9.html#SEC9> concerning choice of
> languages.
It's not a must to choose C as your programing language, you can also
write GNU Application in C++.
Sandy
------------------------------
From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP connection ... Help
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 10:21:29 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi, there:
> I'm trying to set up PPP connection. I read some HOWTO articles and tried
> the manual script in them. And also I tried the default scripts coming with
> RH5.2(of course replace the phone number, username and passwd). But both
> failed. I can hear the modem dialing and successfully connected but soon it
> stoped. Following are the scripts in those two methods and the results in log
> file. Does anyone know what's wrong? Thanks a lot.
>
[cut nice detailed description]
Have you checked out using PAP rather than CHAP? (pap-secrets file
instead of chap-secrets, etc.). More ISPs use that, I think. Maybe you
can get it set up that way using RedHat's configuration thingy. Hope
that helps...
------------------------------
From: Mark Tranchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: new mb+cpu will it hose my linux?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 08:09:15 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should be fine, so long as you're not using anything too hardware
specific like fbconsole. If you're that bothered, you could compile a
kernel for the new system with the old one before switching...
Mark.
Jason Ogren wrote:
>
> I run RH 4.2 kernel 2.0.36, upgraded to glibc and I have a p150 (nonmmx)
> and TritonII MB.. I will be upgrading to a k6-400 /100mhz bus/AGP MB.
> Will I even be able to log on to my linux installation to allow me to
> recompile the kernel or will I have to start fresh?
>
> Jason
------------------------------
From: Mark Tranchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: modutils for 2.2.2
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 08:15:05 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't it be a good idea (hint, hint) for Linus (?) to copy
modutils-2.1.121 to modutils-2.2.0 in the v2.2 directory?
Mark.
Joachim Feise wrote:
>
> yhauser wrote:
> >
> > I've installed kernel 2.2.2 successfully just for module support (marked
> > ENABLE LOADABLE MODULE SUPPORT and KERNEL MODULE LOADER). My modutils
> > are 2.1.85 - they run with my old kernel 2.0.33, but they fail with
> > 2.2.2.
> > Can anybody give me a hint?! yves
>
> You need modutils 2.1.121. Available at
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.1/modutils-2.1.121.tar.gz
>
> -Joe
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joachim Feise Ph.D. Student, Information & Computer Science
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: Keith Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UNIX/Linux book request for SysAdms
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:35:33 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What do you recommend that I purchase as an authorative, concise book about
> UNIX/Linux System Administration books? I have seen a lot, but does anyone
> out there who is a UNIX SysAdm have a book that they would recommend?
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
A good starter is Essential System Administration by AEleen Frisch published by
O'Reilly&Associates, Inc. They are up to a second edition on this tytle.
Very good for people interested in learning more about SysAdmin on a wide
range of UNIX/LINUX platforms.
For more indepth coverage on the linux side you might consider.
Linux Unleashed by Sams Publishing. The third addition was just released, and they
even have a version geard primarily twards RedHat as well.
Keith Davey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Fu)
Subject: Re: ftp login failed with wu.ftp_2.4.2
Date: 8 Mar 1999 18:20:19 GMT
David Novo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have installed Red Hat 5.2 with wu.ftp_2.4.2. I want to limit the users to
: do ftp only in they folders.
Subscribe to WU-FTPD list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and send your
question to them ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Gregory A Lundberg keeps good track of responding. Good luck!
--
Dustin Fu
Software Systems Specialist
Academic Computing Services
University of Texas at Arlington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
817-272-2208
------------------------------
From: fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP! D drive disappeared after installed RedHat5.2
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:34:26 +0500
I beleive you installed RH in the "D" drive.
Sorry ...
Synapse Man wrote:
>
> Hi. Here's the situation. My friends got Win98, and one HDD partitioned
> into C- and D-drives.
>
> He installs RedHat 5.2, and then under Win98, loses his D-drive. The
> icon for D-drive is still there, but it reports "drive not ready",
> "invalid drive specification" or something like that.
>
> I suspect that the D-drive partition is gone and needs to be
> re-formatted, but I am not sure at all.
>
> What's happening? What should he do now?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ----------------------
>
> Note: Bogus e-mail used to deter spammers. Pls reply to Newsgroup.
> Thanks.
--
============================================
This are my personal opinions
Real email: sanabriaf at yahoo dot com
------------------------------
From: Koen de Boev� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hylafax
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:27:29 +0000
On Mon, 08 Mar 1999, Harris Wong wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've added a new modem by 'faxaddmodem' then everything is fine(modem is
>detected), but when i type 'faxmodem -u 0 /dev/cua1', there's the error
>message:
>FIFO: open: No such device or address
>
>I'm sure that the modem is working and configured at /dev/cua1.
>
>What's the problem?
>
I think that the modem needs to be added on ttyS.. (eg ttyS0 or ttyS1)
If I remember well I did the same thing and for me It didn't work either
when I used ttyS0 I had no problems.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Startup...
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 19:25:12 GMT
Hi there, I am new to Linux (migrating from Windows). I need to learn any
thing and everything about Linux, Linux internals etc. Can Any body suggest
me some books or websites where I can get more information? I have RedHat
Linux 5.2.
Thanks
-Prabhashankar
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Public license question
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:02:18 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bernd Gehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's a variation of an operating system that does normally include
>Qt, but not Motif. But for the given question (section 3 of the GPL)
>this is irrelevant. This section requires that for components of the
>operating system which accompany a GPL'd program, the source must
>be provided. Qt always comes with source code, so this is not an
>issue. For Motif, it _is_ an issue. GPL'd programs statically linked
>with Motif are always in violation with the GPL. Moreover, with the
>unusual definition given in the GPL (compilers are part the OS), one
>cannot ship a compiler bundled with e. g. Emacs without providing
>source for the compiler. AFAIR Sun did exactly this.
Am I misunderstanding you, or do you have it backward? The GPL says that
you do *not* have to provide source code for the parts that are normally
supplied with the OS.
BTW, it seems to me that the GPL should have made an exception to this
exception. The owner of the OS probably should *not* be allowed to
distribute the GPLed code without releasing their libraries. The purpose
of the exception was to allow people who don't have any way of providing
the OS source code to distribute applications that are linked with the OS's
libraries. But the OS vendor doesn't have this limitation, except insofar
as they place it on themselves. They shouldn't be allowed to take
advantage of GPLed software without "joining".
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
------------------------------
From: Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: GNU version of phigs for Linux (?)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:59:45 -0330
Hello,
Is there a freely available version of the phigs library out there?
Here are some links to commercial versions:
http://www.tgs.com/products/gphigs.html
http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/asd/gphigs/index.html
Has phigs ever been free? What's the difference between phigs and gphigs?
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Public license question
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:06:16 GMT
In article <0a%D2.70699$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christopher Seawood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Barry Margolin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>You just changed your viewpoint from there must be an API compatible
>alternative library to there must be an API compatible alternative library
>that implements all of the features of the original.
When did I say "all of the features"? I said it couldn't be a stub that
doesn't do anything but respond to the API, it must be functional.
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
------------------------------
From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux
Subject: Re: linux for beginers
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 10:03:17 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
<Snip>
>
> Redhat 5.2 comes with "Teach Yourself Linux in 24 Hours" and 3 other Linux
> Books on an extra CD in pdf format.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
This may not be true. There are two RedHat 5.2 distributions available
in CompUSA - one from RedHat that does NOT have these, and one from
Macmillan (www.mcp.com) that does have these online references, but
seems to have less included software.
Dennis,
------------------------------
From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Public license question
Date: 08 Mar 1999 17:29:46 +0100
Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> NF Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Let's take a slightly more tenuous link between the GPL work and another
> >program. What if I wrote a proprietory program which acts as a wrapper
> >to gcc, allowing you to specify source files and compilation options
> >using a gui. My program uses the options supplied and then exec's gcc.
> >To me this seems little different from the dynamic linking case. It
> >further fulfils the condition that my program would be useless without
> >gcc; yet I very much doubt anyone could claim that it was a "derived
> >work" of gcc.
>
> Based on what RMS has said about plug-ins, I think he *would*.
Wrong. A plugin adds functionality to an existing program by
extending it. The existing program's functionality gets changed.
This is icing to a cake: it does change the cake, becoming an
inseparable component of a whole derived work.
The example, however, does not change the functionality of gcc. It
just calls it via its advertised interface, in exactly the same way as
it would have to be called anyway for work. This is putting the cake
on a platter. The cake can be removed again without problems, and
other cakes of the same size can be put on the platter. The platter
does not form an inseparable component of a whole derived work. You'd
have to put the cake on something, anyway.
--
David Kastrup Phone: +49-234-700-5570
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49-234-709-4209
Institut f�r Neuroinformatik, Universit�tsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan A. Buzzard)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.portable,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: BEST HW For Linux NoteBook Project
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:34:34 +0000
In article <7bt0pn$32r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David A. Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Robert;
> Robert Billing wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>David Fox wrote:
>>
>>> You could get a Pentium 233MMX thinkpad 560X from Micro Warehouse for
>>> $1299.
>>
>> Look, chaps, if you are going to crosspost to uk.comp.os.linux, could
>>we have the prices in sterling as well please? Btw I have just picked up
>>a Libretto, that runs Linux very well, for �600 (that's about $1000).
>
> The GreenBack, the American Dollar, is ubiquitous. It should be as
> familiar as the rising sun in any first world country, second and third
> world I'm not to sure about.
>
I think that you will find the Euro is more relevant in the UK than the US
dollar, which is totally irrelevant and even comes after the Euro/GBP
exchange rate on the news these days.
JAB.
--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Northumberland, United Kingdom. Tel: +44(0)1661-832195
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Sherwin)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Cannot Remove LILO from MBR
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 20:58:08 GMT
On Sun, 07 Mar 1999 08:48:38 GMT, Cevher Dogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snip]
>I installed the HDD as secondary on different computer and tried
>to reformat it there and couldn't. The same reason! Then I put the
>RedHat CD and used FIPS off of that. IT IS VERY BAD THAT, FIPS
>gave me the following info: Checking root sector... Partition table
>inconsistency... Unknown file system 83h. It happened for other
>two partition as well. So it saw the partitions right but could not
>identify the format!!!!?????
>
You must be more systematic in your approach, or nothing will work.
You have 2 disks. The first is the master disk on the primary
interface and the second is the master on the secondary interface. You
should remove all partitions on both disks. If you have a bootable
floppy Linux system, boot and do 'fdisk /dev/hda', delete all the
partitions, then do 'fdisk /dev/hdc' and delete all the partitions.
Now, do a standard RedHat install on the first disk. You need two
partitions, one to install into and one for swap space. RedHat
defaults to using Disk Druid for this which is easy if the disk is
empty. Forget about the second disk at this stage.
When you have installed Linux and can boot it, do 'fdisk /dev/hdc' or
'cfdisk /dev/hdc' and create a partition on it - you only need one. If
you create a primary partition it will be called /dev/hdc1. Create a
filesystem on this by doing 'mkfs /dev/hdc1'. Then check you can mount
it by doing 'mount /dev/hdc1 /mnt'. When this works, create a
permanent mount point for the second drive ('mkdir /disk2' or
whatever) then put an entry in /etc/fstab describing the mount point
and associated disk.
Enjoy your new system.
Best regards, Paul
Paul Sherwin Consulting
22 Monmouth Road, Oxford OX1 4TD, UK
Phone +44 (0)1865 721438
Fax +44 (0)1865 434331
Pager +44 (0)7666 797228
------------------------------
From: "Janus N. T�ndering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCI soundcard a possibility??
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:58:01 +0100
Hi!
I've been told that PCI soundcards are not supported by Linux.
If they are which kernel version is required if it is possible?
Thank you...
Janus N. T�ndering, Denmark
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JK)
Subject: HELP: stuck with gcc & glibc
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 10:34:49 GMT
I've installed RH 5.2 but I can't use gcc, since it cannot load even
one library (e.g. "stdio.h : no such file or directory").
I've verified the loaders: they seem OK. What else can I check?
Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: binary not found by bash
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 21:46:45 +0100
When I try to run certain binary (namely precompiled python), I get
bash: ./python: No such file or firectory
even though python binary is there, with correct rights.
Does it mean that the binary lacks some libraries? If so, can I find
which ones?
--
Milos Prudek
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
