Linux-Misc Digest #67, Volume #20 Wed, 5 May 99 04:13:18 EDT
Contents:
Success!!! (Aaron and Lisa Ginn)
Client drivers for sybase (Flavius Bindea)
Re: GNU reeks of Communism ("Scott MacDonald")
Re: tell me linux---? ("James Liston")
Re: DSL modems under Linux (Alex Lam)
Re: GNU reeks of Communism ("Scott MacDonald")
Re: SUID games? What is RedHat doing? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
?Windows NT dialup to Linux PPP server? (jianhong)
Re: How to get KDE to be default login manager? (Alan Fang)
Re: DHCP server for Linux? ("Ron van Middendorp")
Re: The Best Linux distribution? (was Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux) (Ken Deboy)
Re: how to get atteched files ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: I am on a quest... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DHCP server for Linux? (Azfar Kazmi)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Aaron and Lisa Ginn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Success!!!
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:07:03 +0000
I was finally able to connect to my ISP with the help of a few people, and a quick
search
of dejanews. Someone suggested that my ISP was rejecting me because my username was
incorrect. This was indeed the case as they wanted my username of the form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks to everyone who responded. I just hope I'm able to
return
the favor to someone else at a later date!
Thanks again,
Aaron Ginn
Aaron and Lisa Ginn wrote:
> I'm having establishing a connection with my ISP using PPP. I can make
> the connection, but my modem keeps hanging up on me, and I'm not sure
> why. The problem seems to have something to do with PAP
> authentication. Here is the output from pppd. I was hoping someone can
> shed some light on this for me. Note: I've changed my userid and
> password in the following logfile to USERID and PASSWD. Those are not
> the actual entries.
>
> TIA,
> Aaron Ginn
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> May 2 23:38:24 localhost pppd[1485]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
> May 2 23:38:25 localhost chat[1486]: send (ATD6028890110^M)
> May 2 23:38:25 localhost chat[1486]: expect (CONNECT)
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: ATD6028890110^M^M
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: CONNECT
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: -- got it
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: send (^M)
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: expect (ogin:)
> May 2 23:38:48 localhost chat[1486]: 57600^M
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: MindSpring Phoenix, AZ Dialup
> Service^M^M
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: ^M^M
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: arc-2a.phx2 login:
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: -- got it
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: send (USERID^M)
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: expect (assword:)
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: USERID^M
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: Password:
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: -- got it
> May 2 23:38:49 localhost chat[1486]: send (PASSWD^M)
> May 2 23:38:50 localhost pppd[1485]: Serial connection established.
> May 2 23:38:50 localhost pppd[1485]: Using interface ppp0
> May 2 23:38:50 localhost pppd[1485]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> May 2 23:38:51 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
> 0x0> <magic 0xc6ff7c28> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 2 23:38:51 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru
> 1514> <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x56867921> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11
> 04 05 ea> < 13 03 00>]
> May 2 23:38:51 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04
> 05 ea> < 13 03 00>]
> May 2 23:38:51 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru
> 1514> <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x56867921> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 2 23:38:51 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru
> 1514> <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x56867921> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
> 0x0> <magic 0xc6ff7c28> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
> 0x0> <magic 0xc6ff7c28> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:38:57 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x2
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:38:57 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:39:00 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x3
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:39:00 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:39:03 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x4
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:39:03 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:39:06 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x5
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:39:06 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:39:09 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x6
> user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
> May 2 23:39:09 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
> 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
> 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
> May 2 23:39:09 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [LCP] 05 03 00 00
> May 2 23:39:11 localhost pppd[1485]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> May 2 23:39:11 localhost pppd[1485]: Modem hangup
> May 2 23:39:11 localhost pppd[1485]: Connection terminated.
> May 2 23:39:11 localhost pppd[1485]: Connect time 0.4 minutes.
> May 2 23:39:12 localhost pppd[1485]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: Flavius Bindea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Client drivers for sybase
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 20:47:05 +0200
Hi,
Where can I found a client libraries to connect to SYBASE.
I'm using glibc and debian so I can't use CTLib.
It should be also better if that is not an rpm.
Could you Cc to me by mail if you have the answer.
Regards,
Flav
------------------------------
From: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: GNU reeks of Communism
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 03:11:30 -0300
Reply-To: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Carol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <7gmfr5$dgj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Espel Llima
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Andrew Carol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >You could even distribute encrypted code
> > >which is only decrypted in the CPU itself. (That's been done, it's too
> > >slow today, but you never know).
> >
> > Blah blah blah. If it can execute at all, it can also be saved as a
> > plain executable.
> >
> > At the very worst, you'll have to run it in some kind of JIT CPU
> > emulator once, trapping all suspicious stuff, and save the results.
>
> You miss my point. I was talking about a CPU where the decryption was
> done in hardware. The programmers model of the CPU would not be able
> to see around that. Even kernel level code could only see the
> encrypted bytes.
>
> It would be decrypted _only_ in the decode unit of the CPU.
>
> > You seem to be missing the point that cracking only needs to be done
> > ONCE.
>
> I would think MS would have the funds to find a way to make that hard
> enough to do that no one could hope to succeed.
You seem to forget, MS are the ones that can't seem to make a stable OS, and
you expect them to come up with some super copy protection. HA I laugh at
the idea. Even if they could at some point someone on the inside would leak
the info need to crack it.
Scott
------------------------------
From: "James Liston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tell me linux---?
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:06:15 -0600
You may want to check out these sites.
www.linux.org
www.linuxmall.com
>From there you will find lots of info and links to other related sites.
I would recommend getting KDE. It's a great desktop environment for X.
James Liston
Patrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7golck$96j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello, i'm a Linux Newbie, just started Xwindows in Red hat 5.1.
> Please tell me more about the OS's capabilities, and good
> text to refer to.
> thanks
> patrik
>
>
------------------------------
From: Alex Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL modems under Linux
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:20:03 -0700
George Hartz wrote:
> M Sweger wrote:
> >
> > : You need to watch that. Many, if not most, internal DSL modems
> > : (especially ADSL modems) are actually DSL *win*modems. Most of the DSL
> > : crap happens in software, just like winmodems, and as such won't work
> > : now or ever under Linux.
> >
> > : Good idea with DSL is to stick to ethernet-interfaces on external units.
> >
> > Which DSL,SDSL,ADSL,RADSL etc etc manufacturers make modems that aren't
> > win-modems underneath? I doubt if the box will explicity state it. Is
> > there something to look for I.E. a chip which will serve as an indicator?
> >
> > --
> > Mike,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I couldn't tell you. If in doubt, buy at a place you can return it.
>
> I think you're definately just best off with an external unit with an
> ethernet interface. Then you'll know it works.
>
> - George
>
I'm using Alcatel (supplied by my telco/provider) with SuSE 6.0. connected to a
hub
and two more boxes (one windoze).
No problem whatsoever. Function well with both Linux and Windoze.
Alex Lam.
>
> --
> email:[EMAIL PROTECTED];url:www.bangsplat.org;uin:153182;aim:tgd98
> GCS$/GP/GS/GFA>$ d- s+: a- C++++$ UL++++$ P+++$ L+++$ E- W++>$ N+@ !o
> K+++ w--- !O M-@ V PS+ PE Y+ PGP t-(+) 5- X++ R-(--) tv+ b+++ DI++ D+
> G+ e* !h r y++
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Remove the X from my email address if reply by e mail.
**************************************************
------------------------------
From: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: GNU reeks of Communism
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 03:16:26 -0300
Reply-To: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Carol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <7gnk3q$2h1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Espel Llima
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If vendors know the key to encode, then you do too (unless you posit
> > secret channels between Intel and every software vendor, which wouldn't
> > remain secret very long anyway).
> >
> > Or if they use public key crypto, you could create your own key pair,
> > give one key to the software vendor, and decrypt with the other.
>
> 1 - Person buys software which is encrypted by vender.
> NOTE - Vender may change keys frequently.
>
> 2 - Person registers software on-line.
>
> 3 - CPU provides ID of CPU to vender.
Give vender $20 bucks for that very same ID. The code is broken.
> 4 - Vender passes that to Intel via web channel.
>
> 5 - Intel returns CPU's public key.
> This prevents spoofing. Intel knows all id->public key pairs
> 6 - Vender uses CPU's public key to encode software decode key. Give
> this to the user.
>
> 7 - User writes this "magic" value to hardrive.
>
> 8 - When run, the CPU reads the "magic" value, decodes with private
> key, and now obtains the software decode key.
>
> 9 - Software runs, even kernel level code can't see the actual key, or
> the actual decoded binary.
>
> Oh well......
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix
Subject: Re: SUID games? What is RedHat doing?
Date: 5 May 1999 06:41:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan J Rosenthal) writes:
>Of course, it's easy for me to say this because I don't have to do it. As I
>mentioned, I don't know the technical details behind what svgalib is using
>root for, and I don't know how hard it would be to eliminate the root
>requirement. It's definitely theoretically possible, though.
I think it requires kernel mods, which Linus may not want to stick in his
kernel because there's already a game O/S out there called "Win95." At least
in one of those articles interviewing him (or maybe it was the FNAL visit?)
which got linked by slashdot he came down against messing with the kernel
for games...
--
Lamont Granquist ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ICBM: 47 39'23"N 122 18'19"W
------------------------------
From: jianhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: ?Windows NT dialup to Linux PPP server?
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:52:33 -0700
Hello, Everyone,
I'm trying to network my laptop(Slackware Linux 3.5) with my
desktop (Windows NT 4.0 SP3) through a Null Modem Cable.
The problem is I can't get the Windows NT dialup to work with the
Linux PPP server. NT dialup complained that "there is an error with
the modem or other device", while the PPPD complained that
"LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests,
Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
Problem: all had bit 7 set to 1"
Can someone help me understant what the error message means?
I know the null modem is working because two machines have
know problem talking PPP when they all run Linux.
Thanks in advance. Jianhong
------------------------------
From: Alan Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: How to get KDE to be default login manager?
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 18:32:02 -0700
Steve,
Thanks very much for you advice. It worked just fine. I think the
reason it's installed in a different directory is that it's the KDE that
came in RPM form with Redhat 6.0.
ACF
This email account is expired - please don't reply to it.
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP server for Linux?
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:02:31 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well,
I've been using it for about 6 months now, and I have no complaints about
stability at all.
The only thing is that DNS isn't working properly anymore, so if you wanna
do a hostname-ip translation, you gotta make a script that takes the names
and addresses from dhcpd.leases.
With kind regards,
Ron van Middendorp
Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7gop7i$qn9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> Its amazing that I am unable to find a stable DHCP server for Linux! I
found
> one at www.isc.org but they say it is partically funtional on Linux! DHCP
> being an important protocol, I believe there will be one for Linux. Where
can
> I find it? I use Redhat distribution, if that matters.
>
> --
> Azfar Kazmi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:08:38 -0700
From: Ken Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: The Best Linux distribution? (was Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux)
Lee Blevins wrote:
-- snip --
> The Linux versions were much more difficult to wade through. More
> complex install routines, vague and even incorrect documentation
> seemed to be what I experienced and then it failed to support my
> hardware.
Maybe the Linux versions you tried were "dated" compared to the
FreeBSD version you tried. What hardware does FreeBSD support that
Linux doesn't, BTW?
> Freebsd on the other hand installed first time and was operational.
That is purely subjective, and has nothing to do with which is the
"better" OS. Some people do find FreeBSD easier to install, but some
people find Linux easier. Redhat >= 4.0 is very easy (and gets easier
with each new release), and SuSE 5.3 is also very easy to install and
set up. Plus they don't stick me with an outdated and fucked up win-
dow manager as the default, I can choose my shell without hassles,
etc...
-- snip--
> As a beginner, I found the process of making floppies to install a
> bit too complex.
If typing "rawrite ..." at a DOS prompt is too complex, then perhaps
ANY flavor of Unix isn't an appropriate OS choice for you.
> Freebsd booted on the cd.
Only if your hardware supports it.
> This was a couple years ago I see RH now has a bootable cd.
Which, on some hardware is useful, but certainly not necesary.
Every Linux distro I've tried came with boot floppies anyway.
> Maybe this stuff is not for beginners and only professional unix
> users need apply but the errors and oversights in Linux documen-
> tation seemed too easy to avoid.
>
> Here's an example. I purchased the Redhat 5.2 recently from
> Compusa. I was thinking this should be a consumer level product
> now since it's being marketed in a consumer computer store.
>
> To my dismay the kernel source wasn't installed during the
> installation.
Wah wah wah... and FreeBSD doesn't install everything I want by
default either... and when I do get it to install what I want, it
insists on doing stupid things like installing not putting bash
in /usr/bin but instead insisting on /usr/local/bin...
> I tried several times using each of the available install routines.
Which install routines were those?
> I discovered this when I tried to build a kernel and the book
> that came with it says, "this assumes the kernel source has been
> installed."
Both SuSE and Redhat let you install the kernel sources as an
installation option, and make it easy to add it later.
-- snip --
> I started poking around on the cd's and found a couple of tarballs
-- snip --
> The rpm didn't produce what I'd have expected. I'd expect an rpm for
> kernel source to just create a src directory somewhere.
So did the CD have tarballs or RPMs? AKAIK, Redhat (and SuSE) have
RPMs and no tarballs. Slackware has tarballs but no RPMs.
> Yes, I could eventually figure this all out. I could go onto the
> internet and ask stupid questions in newsgroups and be treated like
Or you could just post STUPID POSTS stating that FreeBSD is "better"
than Linux just because you, personally, found FreeBSD easier to in-
stall and set up.
> I will continue struggling with Linux just because it's every-
> where and I can't ignore it but for the moment the box is booted
> as Freebsd and I'll just have to find some time to reboot it as
> Linux and deal with that os.
If FreeBSD works for you, then why not just use it and quit your
fucking whining about Linux? FreeBSD is a damn good OS, and it has
excellent Linux binary compatibility... so you don't need Linux,
and you don't need to complain about it either.
> To the Redhat people I say, do a better job. From what I can see
> building a custom kernel is what any unix admin needs to be able
> to do.
That is good, coming from someone who says creating boot floppies
is "a bit too complex." Also, esp for a beginner, "make xconfig" in
Linux is certainly easier than trying to use vi to manually edit the
config file to build a new kernal under FreeBSD.
> Your install and documentation for your compusa release needs to be
> improved considerably. Just adding a sentence like:
>
> "The kernel souce is on CD number 2 of the distribution set in
> /foo/bar/source."
Where is that information located in the FreeBSD documentation?
-- snip --
Ken
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to get atteched files
Date: 4 May 1999 13:21:58 GMT
In his obvious haste, Chri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled thusly:
: how can i get atteched files out of saved mails (with mail ex: save 1
: /root/m1
Your e-mail client should automatically call metamail (assuming you have
metamail installed).
If it's a uuencoded mail, then just save to a file and type uudecode
<filename>
--
=============================================================================
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
=============================================================================
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.slackware.linux
Subject: Re: I am on a quest...
Date: 4 May 1999 13:18:23 GMT
In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.misc didst Jeffery Cann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eloquently scribe:
: for an X-windows email client for Linux. If my dream of the "perfect"
: email client could be written down, it would have the following
: features:
: - stable: never hangs, never blows up!
: - reliable: messages don't evaporate!
: - scalable: if I have 2000 messages saved, performance shouldn't drop.
: - graphical: what can I say, I am not into pine.
Apart from the graphical and threaded bits, I'd say ELM.
: - threaded: this seems to be a hard feature, not sure why.
Newsgroups have a field called References: which lets the newsreader keep
track of threads. E-mailer don't have this, and could only do this sort of
thing off the subject line... Which isn't really good enough...
: What do you use? How does it rate with the above wish list?
Elm. It does everything I need. (Who needs graphics? All they do is slow the
program... And you don't need fancy fonts in an e-mail package)
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |
| Andrew Halliwell | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" |
| Finalist in:- | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
| Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" |
==============================================================================
|GCv3.12 GCS>$ d-(dpu) s+/- a C++ US++ P L/L+ E-- W+ N++ o+ K PS+ w-- M+/++ |
|PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ X+/X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D+ G e>e++ h/h+ !r!| Space for hire |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP server for Linux?
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:41:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Its amazing that I am unable to find a stable DHCP server for Linux! I found
one at www.isc.org but they say it is partically funtional on Linux! DHCP
being an important protocol, I believe there will be one for Linux. Where can
I find it? I use Redhat distribution, if that matters.
--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
