Linux-Misc Digest #103, Volume #20 Fri, 7 May 99 21:13:08 EDT
Contents:
error writing to tape ("Subbiah Rajagopalan")
Re: Hidden files - Linux setup (Gregory S. Lyons)
Re: Tuning Linux? (Marc)
Re: Kernel 2.2.7 (rob)
does linux support compressed binaries? (Kim DeVaughn)
GLIBC2 (Alessandro Magni)
Re: manpages ("J�rgen Exner")
Re: The Best Linux distribution? (was Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux) (David Stanaway)
Re: Win98 and Linux Dual Boot ("D. Vrabel")
Re: GNU reeks of Communism (returning to %252522GNU Communism%252522) ("Joshua E.
Rodd")
Proper use of /usr/local (Re: The Best Linux distribution?) (Tor Slettnes)
Re: How to setuid an executable ? (Juergen Heinzl)
Re: HELP YAMAHA YMF715E-S (Przem Kowalczyk)
Re: Testing my CPU! (Adrian Knoth)
Re: How to run Trident 3DImage975 -based videocards ("Michael Schmeing")
msgfmt command (James Chang)
Re: GNU reeks of Communism
Re: Windows '98 refund ?? ("gm")
SCSI DAT freezes machine (Edward Vigmond)
Re: does linux support compressed binaries? (Juergen Heinzl)
Re: Where to get gzip (Juergen Heinzl)
Re: GLIB 1.2.1 install (Sid Boyce)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Subbiah Rajagopalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: error writing to tape
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 17:36:16 -0400
I hv a Prosignia 300
For some reason the tape drive wouldn't work when I give the command
tar cvf /dev/st0 /home/subbiah/test
I get the following error messages:
tar: can not write to /dev/st0: input/output error
tar: error is not recoverable. exiting now
st0: error with sense data: extra data not valid Current error st09:00 sense
key Illegal Request
st0: error on write file mark
Would be grateful if someone can give me a hand here.
thanks!
;-)
Subbiah
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 14:35:43 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Lyons)
Subject: Re: Hidden files - Linux setup
globally changing file attributes is probably a bad idea, try this
instead...
use
C:\>dir /s /a:h
to locate the file(s) in question, _then_
C:\>attrib -r -a -s -h <path\filename>
C:\>del <path\filename>
OR
C:\>move <path/filename> <newpath>
as required to delete/move the offending files.
Greg
On Thu, 6 May 1999 10:06:05 -0400 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Roux)
wrote:
>C:>attrib -h -r -s *.* /s
>
>Nick
>
>On Thu, 06 May 1999 09:55:16 +0200, in comp.os.linux.misc Alessandro
>Magni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Been satisfied with Linux as my new OS, I decided to shrink even more
>>the Win98 partition that remains
>>on my disk (most for gaming purposes).
>>Unfortunately I discovered that, defragmenting it, I cannot gain the
>>space I hoped, because some hidden
>>file in the tail of the disk has not been moved.
>>
>>Do you know of some program - under Win, Dos - able to display filename
>>& position on disk,
>>so that I can get rid of it?
>>
>>Thank for your help
>>
>>
>> Alexxx
>
>
>=====================================================
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.bigfoot.com/~nick.roux
>
>"Debugging is a complete waste of time.
>Just write it correctly to start with."
>=====================================================
------------------------------
From: Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tuning Linux?
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 01:05:35 +0200
Just where exactly have you seen anything about tuning linux in those
how-tos???
Erik Svenkerud schrieb:
>
> Marc wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone of you have information on tuning linux?
> > links r welcome, too.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Marc
>
> Hi there,
> look in the linux how-to`s,
>
> Erik
------------------------------
From: rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,linux.act.kernel,linux.redhat.misc,linux.sources.kernel
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.7
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:09:16 GMT
Dirk Demuynck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone tell me how to upgrade from RH5,2 kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.7. I have
> the file but do not know how to begin.
I have the info and all the upgrade files at
http://linux.iowa-city.ia.us
It is updated alot and it also contains the Alan Cox 2.2.7-ac2 upgrade
and info..
If that url breaks agian you can always get me at
http://iowacity.cjb.net
--
Rob Seemuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home of Rob's Linux World!! (AKA The Penguin's Pond!!)
http://linux.iowa-city.ia.us ICQ# 272853
Everyone, to e-mail me, you have to remove the no.SPAM
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim DeVaughn)
Subject: does linux support compressed binaries?
Date: 07 May 1999 20:06:11 GMT
I just signed up with an ISP that is running linux.
One thing that I haven't been able to determine is whether or not there
is some way I can "compress" (in some fashion) the binaries that I'll
be putting in my ~/bin, and have them automatically loaded/executed.
I ask, because this is something that is supported transparently at my
old ISP (running FreeBSD) ... all one needs to do is gzip the binary,
and rename it to eliminate the .gz extension. The loader does the rest.
The new ISP is running:
Red Hat Linux release 4.0 (Colgate)
Kernel 2.0.18 on an i586
W: uname -a
Linux earth.wazoo.com 2.0.18 #1 Tue Oct 22 14:28:15 EDT 1996 i586
and something along the lines of what FreeBSD does, would be very
convenient, as the new account only comes with 5 MB of storage.
I also know of a scheme that could be used at Netcom (SunOS) when I
had an account there, wherein the gzip'd binary would be appended to a
small shell script, which would uncompress the binary append, and then
exec it. This scheme (mostly) worked, but could cause problems with
signal handling (^Z, etc), in some circumstances.
Does linux have such a mechanism available (if there is no transparent
mechanism)?
Thanks for any info ...
/kim
===============================================================================
"You live and you learn. Or you don't live long." --Lazarus Long (paraphrased)
------------------------------
From: Alessandro Magni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: it.comp.linux,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: GLIBC2
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:42:37 +0200
While trying to install some (forgot which) program, I discovered I need
GLIBraries vs.2
Now the questions:
1) as a Red Hat 5.2 user, once I install glibc-2.1.1-6.i386.rpm (the
last one, I hope),
am I done? Or I have to tweak something manually?
2) Once I've done it, can I install my previous libraries, or some
programs still depend
on the previous version?
3) Do GLIBC2 have some major bugs, that should prevent me from
installing it?
4) Last: where the major documentation on this topic lies, particularly
for GLIBC2 & RH5.2 ????
Please, reply by email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ Alessandro Magni
/ IEN Galileo Ferraris
\ c.M.d'Azeglio 42, 10125 Torino (ITALIA)
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ Fax (39)11-6507611
/ Tel (39)11-3919757
\ Homepage at:
http://alpha.ien.it/~magni/home.html
/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: "J�rgen Exner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: manpages
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 12:15:46 -0700
Reply-To: "J�rgen Exner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Bieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> is it possible to convert manpages into ordinary textfiles?
Simple: Just use nroff instead of groff when formatting them.
jue
--
J�rgen Exner
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stanaway)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: The Best Linux distribution? (was Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux)
Date: 3 May 1999 14:31:48 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> [courtesy cc of this posting sent to cited author via email]
>
>In comp.os.linux.misc, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Blevins) writes:
>:The Linux versions were much more difficult to wade through. More
>:complex install routines, vague and even incorrect documentation seemed
>:to be what I experienced and then it failed to support my hardware.
>
>It's a Brave Gnu World. I believe that you're supposed to be shut-up
>and enjoy it, or if you don't like that a manpage is missing or crappy,
>to write it yourself. Uh uh.
All this talk about Linux not being documented.. well it is a little odd.
Most of the GNU utils are a little sparse with their man pages.. they tend
to document with gnu-info (I don't like it myself.. at least I don't like
the emacs like curses (Or equiv) info reader. I can see where they are
getting at with the info format and hyperlinking.. but I still do prefer
the manpage format.
gnu utils, before you say they are undocumentd, should have their info
pages inspected, and the listing from
g<frombsd> --help
I don't find that docs are a problem with my Debian 2.2 system, and I
have not had much experience with the docs system for FreeBSD.. going
by the reports in this thread.. every app is going to be at least as well
documented as bash is in linux. I won't hold my breath too hard (Seems like
people have been recounting linux experiences from a few years back or from
the GUI-centric Redhat distribution that I don't really have much time for.
David Stanaway
------------------------------
From: "D. Vrabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 and Linux Dual Boot
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 20:08:39 +0100
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Sasa Ostrouska wrote:
> Robear wrote:
>
> > Please bare with me on this. It is not covered in any FAQ or newsgroup that
> > I have come across.
> >
> > I have two IDE HD. First hard disk has Win98 32 Bit partition installed on
> > it. The second HD has Linux.
> >
> > At present, I use a floppy to boot Linux, and automatically load Windows 98
> > when I want to use it.
> >
> > What I would like to do, is have a menu on the first HD to be able to choose
> > Win98 or Linux...
> >
> > Ah hah I here you say, use LOADLIN.
> >
>
> No Use LILO !
>
> Install LILO and configure it should be the best thing for you.
No Use loadlin !
I'd strongly recommend loadlin for any one with a FAT[32] partition.
Because it has no BIOS related problems so will always work. It is also
easier to set up and there is no problem with Windows 9x removing LILO.
David
--
David Vrabel
Engineering Undergraduate at University of Cambridge, UK.
------------------------------
From: "Joshua E. Rodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: GNU reeks of Communism (returning to %252522GNU Communism%252522)
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 18:51:32 -0400
Marco Anglesio wrote:
> On the contrary; the government's big-money development has created
> considerable benefits. The US has near-universal literacy, for example;
> you wouldn't have that (and hence wouldn't have a modern industrial
> economy, much less be moving into the information age) without public
> schools and public universities.
Literacy was around 99% in the late 19th century, before there were
educational systems funded by federal or state governments on a
widespread scale. Since the implementation of universal government
education, literacy has declined.
> Defense research initiatives have certainly paid good value when you look
> at their spin-offs, such as the internet, notwithstanding the immense
> amount of money poured into primary research. March's IEEE Computer
> magazine goes into a brief treatment of research models: basically, you
> can have cheap or you can have fast research, but you can't have both. The
> military-industrial complex chose fast. You are where you are because the
> military-industrial complex chose fast.
Yes, but military expenses are part of the government's duty to
protect their citizens. It has nothing to do with planning an
economy.
(During wartime a transition to a planned economy is often
neccessary and may even be desirable; I'm not discussing that
here, however.)
> This reminds me of a physician quoted in the Globe and Mail, talking about
> the new grassroots opposition to mandatory vaccination. He said that
> people are opposing vaccination because they've never really seen what
> vaccination prevents; mandatory vaccination has reduced the incidence of
> many formerly common childhood diseases to near zero. I'm sure you can
> draw the parallel yourself if you care to.
People are generally opposed to vaccination because either (a) they've
had a horrible experience with the 1% of vaccinations where the vaccinee
becomes ill or (b) they're religiously opposed to it, in which case it's
not a position of a civil authority to use force (we don't need a Sharia
society).
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Proper use of /usr/local (Re: The Best Linux distribution?)
From: Tor Slettnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07 May 1999 17:28:19 -0700
>>>>> "wclark" == wclark xoom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wclark> The fact that Linux installs everything in the world into
wclark> /usr/bin is just plain _wrong_. When Linux installs do
wclark> that, they are ignoring the defaults set down by the
wclark> developers of those applications. Is it really that
wclark> troublesome to have to type "make --prefix=/usr/bin
wclark> install" rather than "make install"?
Actually this is both FHS and POSIX compliant, as well as common
sense:
- Binaries needed to boot the machine go into /bin and /sbin
- Binaries that are part of the non-X part of the distribution
go into /usr/bin and /usr/sbin
- Binaries that run under X go to /usr/X11R6/bin
AND:
- Binaries that you install locally go to /usr/local/bin.
Basically, the distribution of an operating system should never touch
/usr/local - that's your own space. That's also why "configure" uses
this directory by default - that's where you want to put things when
you build them locally.
For OS distributions, they would be built with "configure --prefix=/usr",
for instance.
In FreeBSD's case, it makes sense to put items from the ports
collection into /usr/local - that's because those are programs you
essentially get and build on your own. They do not have an
uninstaller, similar to Debians 'dpkg --purge <packagename>', and so
manual surgery is needed. That's why they are in /usr/local - so that
/usr remains free from cruft.
Now, the difference between ../bin and ../sbin is a little more
unclear. It used to be that static binaries went into sbin, and
binaries linked against a library in ../lib went into ../bin.
Nowadays, however, more and more people seem to have the idea that
'sbin' is for system administration utilities.
-tor
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: How to setuid an executable ?
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 23:59:30 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, christophe wrote:
>I'd like to allow others users (than root) to
>execute pppd. What shall I do ?
>I don't want to chmod 777 /usr/sbin/pppd
Would not do the job anyway ... chown root /usr/sbin/pppd and
chmod 4111 would do the job if you do not want to put pppd in
its own group (users can be in more than one group).
If you want to, then ...
chgrp whatever /usr/sbin/pppd
chmod 4110 /usr/sbin/pppd
... and see usermod for the rest.
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Przem Kowalczyk)
Subject: Re: HELP YAMAHA YMF715E-S
Date: 3 May 1999 12:15:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.os.linux.misc wrote:
>HI, Ive installed RedHat 5.3. Ive got a YAMAHA YMF715E-S(OPL3-SA3) sound card
>integrated with my motherboard. Im unable to find the suitable drivers for
>the same. If anybody has got the solution for the same , please help. Any
>support is highly appreciated. Thanks SunilN
Have you tried Alsa drivers? ( http://alsa.jcu.cz )
Przem
--
When the day is long and the night, the night is yours alone,
when you're sure you've had enough of this life, well hang on.
Don't let yourself go, everybody cries and everybody hurts sometimes.
R.E.M
------------------------------
From: Adrian Knoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Testing my CPU!
Date: 7 May 1999 14:54:50 GMT
Ferdinand V. Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI all,
Hi !
btw: hotmail-->trash
> I can't find a single app to do that except the password cracker
> program I'm running now.
spawn some mp3-encoders while compiling several apps... gtk+glib+gimp+kernel
would be enough :)
> It can push my CPU up to 99% usage
> and still my PC can run well even if I'm runnning other programs
> like X11amp, netscape and do some cron schedules to run the
> updatedb program every 5 min. interval, check mail regularly,etc.
> Is this a sound test?
I think you should have a look at "man nice".
> I just want to compare because in the office, I'm running WIN NT
> and if the cpu usage is close to 100% I cannot move my mouse
> pointer anymore. Any suggestions?
try pressing the right mouse-button. you'll get 100% cpu usage. this
is NT : nasty technology. -->trash, too.
--
bye --> cu --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Adrian Knoth --> http://adi.thur.de
Mit leerem Kopf nickt es sich leichter.
------------------------------
From: "Michael Schmeing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to run Trident 3DImage975 -based videocards
Date: 02 May 1999 11:00:02 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Many people complained they could not run videocards with Trident
> 3DImage975 (9750) chipset at decent resolutions (usually, the screen
> just remained black at something like 1024x768).
>
> [...]
>
> bpp/resolution 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1152x864 1200x1024
> 8 * * * * *
> 16 * * * * *
> 24 * * * - -
> 32 * * * - -
>
> [...]
> The details are at
>
> http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~comech/tools/3DImage975.html
>
> If you have time and need to try this recipe, I'd appreciate to hear
> from you whether this (or some modification) solves your problems with
> this chipset.
Well I tried it out to some extend: I want to be able to use all
mentioned resolutions (640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1152x864, 1280x1024
(that is the usual resolution, I never saw 1200x1024 before)) without
having to edit /etc/XF86Config all the time. I did not manage to get
there whatever I tried. I can use 640x480, 800x600, 1280x1024 without
problem but the other two just give a black screen.
By the way, may graphic-card is an appollo 3D 9750 AGP which has a
Trident 9750 graphic-processor.
Bye,
Michael
--
Michael Schmeing, Artillerieweg 46, D-26129 Oldenburg
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE/~michae2
------------------------------
From: James Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: msgfmt command
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 00:35:58 +0800
Hi there
During compiling( make ), I met an error message " can not find msgfmt command
in /bin/sh".
Could anybody tell me how to get the file?
Thanks in advance
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: GNU reeks of Communism
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 14:23:56 -0700
On Thu, 06 May 1999 13:51:59 -0700, Andrew Carol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias Warkus
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Don't try to divert from the subject. We were talking about how fast
>> software development is. And I don't need to explain to you what the
>> reason is that people run Windows and not an alternative?
>
>Speed of development is one small part of the overall equation of cost,
>availability, features, quality, support, documentation, etc.
>
>People weigh it their own way and use what they want. If proprietary
>was not better able to meet some needs it would simply not exist.
That's a rather naieve point of view given the typical consumer.
That's also compounded by the fact that software is the sort of
thing that tends to lock the consumer in once they've made that
first fatal mistake (vendorlock).
[deletia]
--
Microsoft subjected the world to DOS until 1995. |||
A little spite is more than justified. / | \
In search of sane PPP Docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: "gm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] REMOVE NOSPAM to reply>
Subject: Re: Windows '98 refund ??
Reply-To: "gm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] remove NO_SPAM to reply>
Date: 7 May 1999 15:02:23 -0600
In the newsgroups there were notes that a very few persons did obtain
a refund, more in Australia from what I saw. Most of the effort
that
went along with the protest day seemed to be directed
more to publicize that there is another computer operating system,
rather than address the justice issue that a consumer should not be
expected to pay for something he does not want. Had the effort been
more on the individual justice, the protest march would have been
better
directed at the persons who put the operating system there--the
hardware manufacturer; such an international protest would have been
splintered at diverse sites, and directed at many different
companies,
so the publicity would not have been as good as against the one.
If you are set on not paying for the one OS, the best way would be to
buy it from a place that is willing to sell that way, without it
installed. The
place that you purchase from should be able to tell you the exact
procedure to obtain any refund and specify what value that is, and
guarantee that you get it in a specific time. If the seller does not
do
this, expect a hassle that might not be worth the time and effort.
If you do not purchase the computer from a vendor because of the
bundled OS, be sure the vendor knows why, and he can start to
think about how to increase his sales.
regards,
gm
------------------------------
From: Edward Vigmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SCSI DAT freezes machine
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 22:59:30 GMT
Hello
I was wondering if anyone experienced this problem and figured out what
to do about it. It works fine for small backups (less than 3 MB), but
after that, it will lock up at some point (between 3 and 60 MB) and I
have to reboot. I am using an Adaptec 1520 SCSI card under RH 5.1 with a
Sony SDT-7000.
Thanks
--
Ed Vigmond
Institut de Genie Biomedical, Universite de Montreal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: does linux support compressed binaries?
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 23:04:31 GMT
In article <373347b3$0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
>I just signed up with an ISP that is running linux.
>
>One thing that I haven't been able to determine is whether or not there
>is some way I can "compress" (in some fashion) the binaries that I'll
>be putting in my ~/bin, and have them automatically loaded/executed.
There is something like gzexec ... there is something like a security
problem with gzexec too ... reference floating around here somewhere ...
but what I still know out of my head is do not use it.
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: Where to get gzip
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 23:04:30 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Slip Gun wrote:
>Hi,
>I am a new Linux user wanting to download gzip. I have found a copy on
>the sunsite archive and downloaded it, but it's a gz file. Where could
>I get a version of gzip that I dont need gzip to unzip? :-)
Every Linux installation should come with one, though if not you
might take a look here ...
ftp.demon.co.uk:/pub/gnu/gzip
...
It should be a .shar file there, this is a shell archive and you
can "unpack" using sh <file>. If you still have problems or there
is no such thing (I'd to look to be honest) send me a mail and then
I can either send it to you or you can download the source from
my machine.
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
------------------------------
From: Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GLIB 1.2.1 install
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 18:53:21 -0400
Either glib is not at 1.2.2 or you need to add "--disable-glibtest"
when running configure.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I too installed glib 1.2.2 correctly. But when I try to configure gtk+ 1.2.2,
> it says that I have the wrong version of glib.
>
> But it IS the right version! What's wrong? Please help - I'm new to unix/linux
> et al.
>
> Kanlaya
--
... Sid Boyce...Amdahl(Europe)...44-121 422 0375
Any opinions expressed above are mine and do not necessarily represent
the opinions or policies of Amdahl Corporation.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
