Linux-Misc Digest #103, Volume #21 Wed, 21 Jul 99 00:13:14 EDT
Contents:
vcheaper surfing ("Gratissurfer")
Updates to the "Unofficial Oracle on NT" site... ("David Sisk")
Re: Major RedHat 6.0 Disappointment (-DadKind)
Re: Sony SDT-2000 Can't mount KDE's tape backup. ("Gene Heskett")
anonymous ftp - still have permissions problem (Gerald Pollack)
Re: Overwritten LILO (Cameron L. Spitzer)
How do you pronounce "LINUX"?? (Carlos Moreno)
problem with talk_daemon (Weizhong)
The # of cyl is set to 1582: Lilo & ATA-66 ("WME")
Re: Initio SCSI help (Edward J. Smiley Jr.)
Re: Lilo & EZ-Drive ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: still having mouse prob (John Brashier)
Re: How do you pronounce "LINUX"?? (Howard Mann)
Re: tape backup device under Linux (Tomasz Korycki)
Opportunity ?? ("Ralph H. Stoos Jr")
No boot log; how to get it back? (Max)
Re: Linux Kernel Compilation Problem (Lev Babiev)
Re: root password ("Brad Ball")
Re: How to change the time? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
missing modules during boot -- redhatppp & inittab (Max)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Gratissurfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vcheaper surfing
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 04:11:02 +0200
http://gratissurfen.cjb.net/
------------------------------
From: "David Sisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Updates to the "Unofficial Oracle on NT" site...
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:21:12 -0400
Hello comrades:
After a mere 6 months, I've finally added to new info to the UONT site (link
below). New items you'll find:
1) A sure-to-be-controversial article on storage management, including info
on reorgs (why and why not). Find it by following the performance ->
storage link.
2) A SQL and CMD script to rebuild all user indexes. Follow links to the
downloads -> rebuild indexes page.
3) An NT executable to evaluate user indexes for rebuild, and generate the
necessary script. I've also included the C source code so that Unix shops
can compile for their platform. The source uses the Oracle7 OCI, so
compiling for Unix brands should be easy work. (Please send me feedback on
your results.) In the next couple of months, I hope to revise this utility
to support the Oracle8 OCI and to support rebuild of partitioned indexes.
Thanks for all the kind comments. Please keep your feedback (good or bad)
coming!
Best regards,
--
David C. Sisk
The Unofficial ORACLE on NT site
http://www.ipass.net/~davesisk/oont.htm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (-DadKind)
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Major RedHat 6.0 Disappointment
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 02:20:53 GMT
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:24:45 GMT, "David Eno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's my system configuration:
>
>PIII-450. Epox EP-BX3 CPU board. I can't find any reported conflicts here.
>128M RAM
>Cirrus Logic 5465 AGP Graphics card.
>3COM NIC (3CSM905B-TX-20)
>Soundblaster Vibra 16BIT
>USR 56K Modem
>No SCSI controllers.
>
>My system hangs when running X.
>
Which version of X are you running? Do you need to upgrade to support
your AGP card? I seem to recall that the X kernel did not offer solid
support for the AGP cards until recently.
Just a thought...
-tomas vera
*****************************************
* Back off, Man! I'm a scientist *
* -Peter Venkmann *
* http://www.thesocket.com/~dadkind *
* Home of the Rate Your Wrestler page *
* and Chyna's Corner of the Boiler Room *
*****************************************
------------------------------
Date: 18 Jul 99 00:13:53 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sony SDT-2000 Can't mount KDE's tape backup.
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Unrot13 this;
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Spotillius Maximus;
SMa> So far, I'm slowly getting the system where I want it. I tried mounting
SMa> it with /dev/st0 or /dev/tape and it say's it can't find tape. Is there
SMa> a driver needed for this drive? Thanks again for the help.
If you are refering to kdat, its busted here too. I even ran it with
strace, and it *never* asked for a device. Ditto for taper, it core
dumped and exited about 50 files into getting ready to do a 22,000 file
backup.
However, if you can find a RH5.1 disk, it has a copy of bru2000 on it,
and with one semi-major quibble, it appears to be working just fine with
my 8 gig DDS2 drive.
That semi-major quibble is that I can command mt to do an 'seod', and it
takes about a minute for the drive to do it all by itself. The reels
positively wind up like a fire siren. Ask bru to append, and its now
been hammering along at the search for EOD for over 30 minutes, while the
bus is busier than that famous cat on a tin roof, and the drive sounds
like its being abused, lots of rattling sounds. Its looking for the end
of about 3.8 gigs worth of stuff already on the tape.
Unforch, bru doesn't take the drives status report, easily available
from mt, as gospel, but has to rewind it and do its own search.
If its reading at 1x to find it, then thats going to be an additiional
2+ hours on the mechansim and tape that is a total waste IMO.
But, OTOH, it works, doing the initial 3.8 gigs worth in 2:05, and
another 2:05 or so for the verify pass. Not too shabby.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040 50 megs fast/2 megs chip
Ch. Eng. @ WDTV-5 |A2091,GuruRom,1g Seagate,CDROM,Multiface III
|Buddha + 4 gig WDC drive, 525 meg tape
|Stylus Pro, EnPrint, Picasso-II, 17" vga
RC5-Moo! 690kkeys/sec isn't much, but it all helps
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
--
------------------------------
From: Gerald Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: anonymous ftp - still have permissions problem
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:33:49 GMT
I'm at a loss. I'm unable to upload files to my linux machine (RedHat
5.2, kernel 2.2.2, by anonymous ftp. Uploading as a normal user works
fine, as does downloading as anonymous. I've set the permissions on the
target directory (/home/ftp/pub) to 777, and I've included the following
2 lines in /etc/ftpaccess:
upload /home/ftp /home/ftp/pub yes * * 0600
dirs
upload /home/ftp /homt/ftp/pub/* yes * * 0600
dirs
Although, I must admit I'm confused about the entries in ftpaccess,
because the man page for ftpd states that the default behaviour is not
to use the ftpaccess file. And, indeed, uploading as a normal user
worked fine before I added any "upload" lines to /etc/ftpaccess.
I'd be very grateful if someone can point me towards a step-by-step
HOWTO that might help.
Thanks,
--
Gerald Pollack
Dept. of Biology, McGill University
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron L. Spitzer)
Subject: Re: Overwritten LILO
Date: 21 Jul 1999 01:35:29 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fred W. Snyder wrote:
>After having Redhat 5.2 coexisting with Win 95 on a 13.0 Gig hd for
>awhile, somehow my LILO failed. Only way I could boot anything was to
>use a DOS boot disk and invoke fdisk /mbr. Committed the cardinal sin
>of not making boot or rescue disks for the installation.
>
>Is there any way I can recreate LILO and access the intact file systems
>of my Linux installation?
You've got the order reversed. First boot your Linux system,
then use it to restore LILO.
Get any Linux rescue disk. Debian Rescue, the Red Hat installation
floppy, the SuSE boot disk, the Slackware boot floppy.
(For example, you could use your Microsoft system to run RAWWRITE.EXE
off your Linux CD and make a new installation floppy.)
Boot the floppy and get a shell. In most cases this involves running
the installation script but not letting it go far enough to
write anything, and switching to another virtual console.
(Alt-F2, Alt-F3...)
Run "fdisk -l" to see the partition table. This will jog your memory
as to where you installed Linux. You need the device name of the
root partition. While you're at it, redirect it to your printer or
just copy the numbers down in case you ever do something bad to your
partition table. (You can just type the numbers in again to restore it.)
Just for luck, run fsck (or e2fsck) against each Linux file system
partition. They should all be "clean."
Reboot the installation floppy. This time, read the messages that
preceed the boot prompt, which is usually "LILO boot:" or
"Syslinux boot:" Now, instead of just hitting Enter for the default
kernel behavior, explicitly invoke the kernel of your choice, specifying
the partition to mount as root. For example, if the bootkernel on
the rescue floppy is named "linux" and you installed your root file
system on /dev/hda3, type this
linux root=/dev/hda3
at the boot prompt, and hit Enter. This tells the loader on the
rescue floppy to boot the rescue floppy's kernel, but mount
your previously installed Linux instead of the installation system.
If your system has no weird devices in the boot path, that the rescue
kernel doesn't recognize, your Linux will come up like an old friend.
Next, edit (or at least view) /etc/lilo.conf and verify that it
describes your computer. Then run /sbin/lilo and everything will
be good as new.
This last step is optional. You could leave Microsoft on your
MBR and boot Linux from a floppy, or LOADLIN, all the time.
Cameron
------------------------------
From: Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How do you pronounce "LINUX"??
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 02:18:41 GMT
Ditto. Maybe a dumb question, but English is not my mother language,
so I'm curious about this. BTW, if you want to send me an attached
wav file, please feel free to do so! (my actual e-mail address is
indicated below)
Thanks!
Carlos
--
My correct e-mail address is moreno at mochima dot com
------------------------------
From: Weizhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem with talk_daemon
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:17:59 -0400
Hi, all
I got some problem with talk daemon. It just doesnot work when I use talk
command.(connection refused) So, I setup ytalk which works well.
here is what I needed for practical usage:
1. let the talk-daemon accept talk request automatically. if normally
prompt in a xterm for confirmation, which could very possible ignored.
2. beep when a request comes.
3. bring up ytalk window automatically.
Cause I am able to find any info about tuning talk_daemon, any suggestion is
welcome. If you show me a manure for talk administration, it will be most
appreciated.
thank you for your attention,
Weizhong
------------------------------
From: "WME" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: The # of cyl is set to 1582: Lilo & ATA-66
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:59:46 -0400
Hi,
I have an ATA-66 13GB drive and a pentium pro 150 motherboard with a
recently updated bios. Everything works fine under Win98, but under Linux.
Whenever I install Lilo and reboot nothing happens. It is as if it was never
installed.
I just downloaded Slackware 4 (thought would solve the problem) and when I
tried to check my drives with Linux's fdisk, I got the following message:
The number of cylinders is set to 1582. There is nothing wrong with that,
but this is larger than 1024 and could in certain setups cause problems
with:
1) Software that runs at boot time (e.g. Lilo)
2) Booting and partitioning software from other OSs (e.g. DOS, Fdisk, OS/2
Fdisk)
What should I do?
My drives:
13G (primary master) Win98
2.5G (primary slave) Win98
1.2G (secondary master) Linux
I even tried putting my old 2.5G as a master (as it was before), but got the
same result.
Any clues?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: Edward J. Smiley Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Initio SCSI help
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 02:27:56 GMT
I have the following Kernal installed: 2.2.9-19mdk. This kernal is
newer than the one you are talking about right? In the Mandrake
Installation, I did not include any Initio drivers. So what should I do
now. Thanks for any help!
Ed
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [Posted and mailed]
>
> In article <7n2850$q4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Edward J. Smiley Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a Sony CDU-948 SCSI CD-writer and the Initio SCSI card that
comes
> > with the drive. It is a 9100U, I believe. Can someone help me with
the
> > drivers that are on there website. From what I read from other
posts is
> > that they have a SCSI hard drive with the Initio card. I already
have
> > linux installed and I just want to get my writer working. Could
someone
> > please help!
>
> Initio drivers come standard with Linux kernels since late in the
2.0.x
> series, so I suggest you upgrade to a kernel that includes the
necessary
> drivers.
>
> --
> Rod Smith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
> NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
> Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que
>
--
Ed Smiley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <--Please Reply here!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lilo & EZ-Drive
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 23:02:34 -0400
EZ bios does not play any roll in the dma66. In fact it is nothing related to the bios
at all. It
is based on the speed of the ide controller.
-Elie
akm76 wrote:
>
> I've got 2 identical 13GB WD HDD(I guess the same as yours) and cd-rom,
> on my celeron box and I even didn't bother myself with EZdrive.
> The one I use for win (got winmodem :( ) was first detected as 13GB LBA,
> but after I installed win it _always_ drops to 7GB (in bios setup),
> which obviously do not confuse win, it uses full capacity.
> Another disk is linux, that one I had to detect as NORMAL, and now
> it stays NORMAL 13GB just fine. Linux sees it all and no problems so far.
> Maybe I'm wrong and you _do_ need EZDrive for something, but I didn't
> discover what for exactly so far.. :)
> Maybe it's crucial to increase performance (i.m. to make it work in
> dma 66 mode), but i'm satisfied with auto dma mode my bios choose for now,
> (it's dma 2, i guess). Anyways, as far as i know few bioses support
> dma 66 right now, my at least which is relatively new supports dma 33
> at most.
------------------------------
From: John Brashier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.install
Subject: Re: still having mouse prob
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 20:22:37 -0700
Allen Wong wrote:
> John,
>
> Is this a PS/2 mouse?
>
> Allen
> --
> Linux: If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
No, tried that already.
John
------------------------------
From: Howard Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do you pronounce "LINUX"??
Date: 21 Jul 1999 02:40:25 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ditto. Maybe a dumb question, but English is not my mother language,
> so I'm curious about this. BTW, if you want to send me an attached
> wav file, please feel free to do so! (my actual e-mail address is
> indicated below)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos
ftp.linux.org/pub/kernel/SillySounds/english.au
Cheers,
--
Howard Mann
http://www.newbielinux.com
(a LINUX website for newbies)
Smart Linuxers search at: http://www.deja.com/home_ps.shtml
------------------------------
From: Tomasz Korycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: tape backup device under Linux
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:57:28 GMT
Matthew Hixson wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend a tape backup device for use under Linux? This is
> to go into a machine with an ASUS P2B-DS motherboard (supports SCSI).
> The machine is currently running kernel 2.2.6, but I can upgrade it if
> necessary.
> Any adivce is welcomed.
> -M@
I've used all kinds of SCSI tapes, from Archive Viper (QIC6150) through
all kinds of DAT (mostly Archive and HP), to (now) IBM-branded Exabyte
Mammoth. Obviously, I know think Exabyte is the best of them, especially
on 170m AME media: quite often when I cut the tape, it spends about 20%
time waiting _for _ the drive, not the other way'round. It's a fast-wide
SCSI, too, so You won't slow Your bus down, either. And, on average, I
manage to squeeze 35-38GB per cartridge.
------------------------------
From: "Ralph H. Stoos Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Opportunity ??
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:11:25 -0400
This message has been posted in a Linux newsgroup in the hope that some
good
programmer(s) will take it and run with it.
I work for a MAJOR printer/copier manufacturer. In recent months we
have added high volume scanning as a capability to some of our
products. It is being touted as a way to store large amounts of
documents electronically which can then be indexed, sorted, archived,
searched on, and otherwise cataloged.
The current model is to scan a document (or documents) and send the
images to a server where they are retrieved and then managed.
IBM has Domino.Doc
CTI has Documentum
Blueridge hasOPTIX
It seems that all the supported solutions run on Windows NT. The myth
of the paperless office notwithstanding, this is at best a clumsy and
unstable solution. I am currently studying to program in C but due to
my slightly advanced age and having three noisy kids I find myself
without the skill level and unable to learn fast enough to write an
application of this scope myself (Also, I am not convinced I would enjoy
writing code for a living).
So I present this because I feel Linux (all forms) would provide a less
expensive and more stable platform to run this application. Here is why
I say this:
Hardware pricing to perform this function is scalable and would cost the
same no matter what software is running.
Software however is the expensive part. The solutions out there are
running close to $8000.00 US for the actual application. Add to this
Windows NT Server at $1800.00 for the base package and a handsome sum
for addtional users licenses adds up to a whopping cost. A Linux
solution with integrated Web and FTP servers plus ODBC and SQL
capabilities (not to mention users numbers are only limited by the
hardware), would make an ideal cost-effective platform for this
application.
I submit this not only because it makes sense from a business
perspective but I want there to always be competition in the computing
world. The competition that has ocurred during my tenure as a computer
geek has pulled computing in general out of the laboratory and onto the
desks and dining room tables of millions (billions?) around the world.
>From using punch cards to writing my own CD-ROMS has been a hell of an
interesting trip. I do not believe that all this would have happened
were there no competition. This is why I am tryng to use this as an
additional venue in which to support Linux.
I would be happy to provide whatever information or help I could to any
programmer(s) out there who wish to undertake this task. In addtion, I
have an idea for another application for Linux that would be much
simpler but this message is long enough already.
Please feell free to respond to me through the newsgroup or at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You,
Ralph H. Stoos Jr.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max)
Subject: No boot log; how to get it back?
Date: 20 Jul 1999 23:39:25 -0400
[ Article crossposted from linux.redhat.misc ]
[ Author was Max ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ]
[ Posted on 20 Jul 1999 23:36:59 -0400 ]
Greetings all (again),
Somewhere in the process of installing, removing linuxconf rpms
I caused it to stop writing to a boot.lod. The log is touched
at the time of booting, exists in /var/log but contains
nothing, i.e. size of 0.
Any help in fixing this would be appreciated.
Max Pyziur
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Lev Babiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Compilation Problem
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:22:18 -0400
Hello Martin,
you seem to have bt848 driver enabled, but no sound support. Aparently
the driver requires sound support. So, either disable this driver or
enable sound. Also I would recommend either get 2.2.10 or 2.3.10 kernel
get a whole tree, do clean install of it and go from there. (2.3.10 had
a major fs rewrite so currently there is no support for FAT or SMBFS)
- Lev
Martin Lucas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have Redhat 5.2 installed with kernel 2.0.36. I have tried to upgrade
> the kernel to 2.3.0 but keep on getting an error (the error is attached
> below). I also tried with the 2.5.5 kernel and got exactly the same
> error message. I checked the Changes document for required software
> versions and upgraded the ones that weren't. The only thing that I
> wasn't sure about was whether I had the correct libc version, but it
> seemed to look OK.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Martin Lucas.
>
> make -C arch/i386/lib
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
> make all_targets
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all_targets'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
> ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
> arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o
> init/version.o \
> --start-group \
> arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o
> fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \
> fs/filesystems.a \
> net/network.a \
> drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.a drivers/misc/misc.a
> drivers/net/net.a drivers/cdrom/cdrom.a drivers/pci/pci.a
> drivers/pnp/pnp.a drivers/video/video.a \
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib/lib.a /usr/src/linux/lib/lib.a
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib/lib.a \
> --end-group \
> -o vmlinux
> drivers/char/char.a(msp3400.o): In function `msp3400c_init':
> msp3400.o(.text+0x1d02): undefined reference to `register_sound_mixer'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
--
==============================================================================
"I don't think Microsoft is | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
evil in itself; I just think they |
make really crappy | irc: CrazyLion, #linuxlounge @ EFnet
operating systems." |
- Linus Torvalds | Linux forever!
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Brad Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.general
Subject: Re: root password
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:05:11 -0700
>Quiney, Philip (EXCHANGE:HAL02:HM10) wrote in message >
>You can start the system in single user mode. At the LILO prompt type:
>linux single
>
>When it finishes you will have a shell as root already logged in. You
WHAT!? Is this true? I must be missing something because this would be a
HUGE security hole. There should be no way of getting root access without
entering the root password. Can someone confirm/deny/explain the above?
Brad.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to change the time?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 03:56:30 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Trung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello folks,
>I have RH6.0 (Linux ver 2.2.5-15) w/ KDE. Currently, I have 2 problems:
>modem & time.
>
>1/ Is there anyone who makes Compaq Presario 336-VSC modem work? In
...<snip, can't help with this.>...
>
>2/ How to change the time? I have the time correct in Win98 & NT but not
>in Linux
>
>Thanks so much in advance for any help.
>Trung Do
>
Well, you can use the date command (man date), but that won't
survive a reboot. You can also use the clock command (I assume your
running this on a 386 style machine), /sbin/clock, which will change
the hardware clock setting. It's man page is in secion 8, man -S 8 clock.
--
Cleave yourself to logodedaly and you cleave yourself from clarity
also: remove "UhUh" and "Spam" to get my real email address -----
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max)
Subject: missing modules during boot -- redhatppp & inittab
Date: 20 Jul 1999 23:39:48 -0400
[ Article crossposted from linux.redhat.misc ]
[ Author was Max ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ]
[ Posted on 20 Jul 1999 23:31:56 -0400 ]
Greetings all,
Recently, I've started getting error messages during my boot
process. They are:
Module redhatppp does not exist
Module inittab does not exist
I think they came about when I installed some later version of linuxconf
and then reinstalled the one from the Redhat5.2 CD.
Any help in fixing this problem would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Max Pyziur
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
