Linux-Misc Digest #940, Volume #25                Wed, 4 Oct 00 04:13:01 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Disable booting message? (John Hasler)
  Re: samba and windoze 98 ("Jason Byrne")
  Re: Superblock corrupt! (NoMadis)
  (subject: mips libc & no fpu) (jauming)
  Newbie Question! (Sort Of!)
  Re: Should I jump into Linux? (Andrew)
  Re: irq problems? (asage)
  [Samba] host allow ("Lucas")
  Help on NIS, please ("renegade")
  Get rid of localhost? (John Carroll)
  Re: Linksys router,@home, need help!! (Glitch)
  Re: Get rid of localhost? (David M. Cook)
  Re: Linux on Laptop ("Henry K")
  Re: Kernel version in Slackware circa 1995 and RedHat 4.x (fred smith)
  Re: slow? (fred smith)
  Re: Printing man pages (fred smith)
  Re: Superblock corrupt! (Eric)
  Re: CTRL-ALT-DELETE (Eric)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disable booting message?
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 03:18:52 GMT

Mandrake 7 User writes:
> Excellent question, and many, many Linux users would be grateful for the
> solution.

Solve the problem yourself.  You have all the tools.

> I would love to hear it myself.

Install Corel.  It's suited to your personality.

> You won't get it on this newsgroup though, which is dominated by
> nonthinking fools who are either to much religiously hooked on any
> default-configuration which they are afraid to break...

You can't solve the trivial problem of changing the startup screen and yet
call those who create those configurations nonthinking fools.  Right.

> ...including totally pointless ones such as the boot message which can
> easily be read from file anyway with a boot disk if something goes
> wrong...

Not true.  Everything is not saved.

> ...or are such irrational haters of MS-Windows and Macs that they detest
> anything which works better on those systems,...

I don't detest them.  They merely disinterest me.

> ...such as a clean startup screen.

But I must confess that I don't quite understand the importance of a "clean
startup screen" for normal use.  Perhaps that's because I only reboot
once every month or so due to a power failure, a new kernel, or new
hardware.  
-- 
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin

------------------------------

From: "Jason Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and windoze 98
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:18:58 -0700

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am able to ping and ftp.  It was suggested to enable encrypted
> password, so I did, then I restarted samba and hit the F5 key to
> refresh the neighbor window and the linux machine poped up.  Then I
> double clicked on it and it said that \\linux was not available.
>

My guess is you didn't actually create an encrypted equivalent of your
existing /etc/passwd.

If you don't have the samba source... grab it...

There are a handful of scripts with the source code - mksmbpasswd.sh being
the most relevant for your situation.

The typical usage is something like:

cat /etc/passwd | /some/path/mksmbpasswd.sh >
/usr/lib/samba/private/smbpasswd

In this case... smbpasswd is the encrypted password file.  There is also a
smbpasswd 'command' that works just like the regular passwd command... but
works with the smbpasswd file.

man smb.conf
man smbpasswd

> Is this information of more use?
> Please help
>
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:23:12 GMT, Patrick M Geahan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The following is my smb.conf file.  I have run through the tests on
> >> the samba page.  I believe that eveything is correct on my linux box
> >> and that there is something wrong on the windoze side.
> >
> >That is possible.  However, without more information as to precisely what
> >the problem is, it will be very difficult to assist you in diagnosing it.
> >
> >> If there is something wrong here, could someone please point it out.
> >
> >Everything in your smb.conf looks OK, but I can't guarantee that.  Have
> >you checked the smb.conf manpage to ensure that your options are being
> >used properly?
> >
> >
> >--
> >-------Patrick M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3784715------
> >Quote of the Week: "Compared to the Black Plague European Tour, nothing
of
> >note has happened in Europe since the Germans got uppity a couple of
times
> >earlier this century." - Natural Born Cereal Killer in alt.peeves
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NoMadis)
Subject: Re: Superblock corrupt!
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 04:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 Svend Olaf Mikkelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>In quite a few cases like this, it is the partition table and not the
>partition itself, that is damaged. If you want me to evaluate the

This is true, the partitiontable was completely destroyed.
The partition was an extended partition with 9 logical partitions in it.
Howver,I have successfully restored the partitiontable and am able to 
access the data in 8 of 9 partitions.

one partition however has a damaged superblock, and I have reason to 
believe it really *is* a damaged superblock.
The partition cannot be mounted anymore, and e2fsck complains about a
damaged superblock and missing magicnumbers.

I have tried to access the page you mentioned
(inet.uni2.dk/~/svolaf/utilities.html)
I regret to tell you that a user svolaf is unknown at that adress, 
and that the sysadmin has assigned your homedirectory and its 
utilities to /dev/null.


--
Greetz,
Joop
=======================================================================
 Joop Bollen.   Nuts & Bolts Department,    Nomadis Systems, Holland
We all live under the same sky, but we don't all have the same horizon.


------------------------------

From: jauming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (subject: mips libc & no fpu)
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 04:17:35 GMT

 (subject: mips libc & no fpu)
dear all,
there are "int __fpc_csr" & "double __fpregs[6]" in struct __jmp_buf[1]
in sysdeps/mips/jmp_buf.h
(glibc-2.0.7)
if the mips cpu has no fpu, can i just simply remove those 2 fpu regs
from struct __jmp_buf[1]?
thanks in advanced!:)


--
--
regards


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie Question! (Sort Of!)
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 04:30:07 -0000

I m wondering what is the difference between RedHat, and uh...Mandrake?
i mean, specificly! Like in softwares, kernel, system bit, etc.


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Should I jump into Linux?
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 04:30:06 -0000

Tony,

       How can I be more clear!!!!  You again answer my
specific question with another question and some metaphors
on learning to drive.

       Yes, I use my computer frequently as a tool to do
my work, and as I've indicated, that only requires use certain
capabilities of my machine.  I don't need to write scripts
or tinker so my machine is optimized to the n-th degree.

       So I ask you, the country driver non-subway person, what
specifically am I missing that will make my computing life so
much better?  I have a finite amount of time in my life, and
there are more important things in my life than messing around
with computers.  BUT...I would be willing to invest time into
learning Linux, if it would make what I do easier, AND give me
capabilities that I didn't have before (that are valuable to ME).

       What are these things of value in Linux?  That's what I
want to know, so I know whether Linux will be valuable to me.
I have no doubt that Linux is superior in many ways.  But if it
isn't going to significantly help me, than it isn't worth the cost.

        Despite my exasperated tone as I approach midnight, I
do appreciate your time in answering questions about Linux.
        Thanks,
         Andrew

      


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: asage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: irq problems?
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:29:07 -0400

hi, thanks :)

Dances With Crows wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 14:47:34 -0400, asage wrote:
> >Sorry if this has been covered before (ad nauseum even).
> >I finally got my 3com modem working - yay.  Now my Wacom tablet won't
> >work.  Previously, when I installed the Wacom, I lost the modem.  So it
> >must be an irq conflict, right?
> >I tried the configuration in Win.  Linux seems pretty reluctant to use
> >it.  hah.  I tried using an unused irq (05).  I tried using a very
> >explicit setserial command (setserial /dev/ttyS3 uart 16550A port
> >[0x02E8] irq 03) and put it in the rc.local file.  No dice.
> [[snipp]]
> >My modem is on
> >ttyS0, irq 4.  The computer's AMDK6II400, Ali motherboard (I know, I
> >know), wheely mouse, Wacom tablet, genuine Soundblaster 16, 2 hdd, 2 cd
> >(that's a challenge for another day).
>
> Plenty of info, but where is the Wacom tablet?  Do you have 2 serial
> ports on this machine?  Is this an internal or external modem?

According to the Wacom software in Windows, it's on Com 4, although you note
below that it's probably on Com 2?  So the Wacom tablet uses the external serial
port, and one p/s2 port, and my MS mouse is plugged into the p/s2 connection, it
allows for that (the Wacom mouse is pretty much useless).  For all intents and
purposes, I only have one external serial port - the computer comes with 2, but
one of them has been dead since I got the computer last year - I didn't discover
that until this spring when I started in on Linux. :(     The modem is internal.

> [snipp]

> If this is
> an internal modem and you only have one serial port, you've got a
> problem, because the first real serial port is generally supposed to use
> IRQ 4 and I/O 0x3f8.  Changing the parameters for the real serial port
> with setserial is often impossible--would it be possible to configure
> the internal modem to use a different ttyS device, IRQ, and I/O?  Or
> alternatively, use the motherboard's BIOS to move the serial port?  (a
> few might let you do that.)

Interestingly, I had checked the Bios, which properly shows that I have only 3
Com ports.  But one of the usable ones was disabled.  Once I enabled that one,
the modem reassigned itself to Com 3.

> If you do have 2 serial ports and you have the Wacom plugged in to the
> second one, the device is /dev/ttyS1 (not S3, even if DOS thinks it's on
> COM4) and it uses IRQ 3 by default.  No conflicts there!

Given that I only have one external serial port, then ... I'm confused <g>

> ALi chipsets are not necessarily evil.

Well.  I can't use a Viper550 that was given to me, even with the patches from
Ali and Diamond and AMD.  The darned thing worked just fine in Linux! LOL.

> Also, why is having 4 IDE devices a challenge?  They should Just Work.
> Elaborate, please....

Well.  The second cd is a cd-rw.  Kudzu found it, but there's no sign of it at
all.  So I checked out some stuff on the web.  I read on a HOWTO that it has to
be a slave to the primary ide in order for Linux to see it.  For me then, it's a
matter of trying to figure out whether to just get longer cables, or physically
re-arrange the drives.  I've got an extra fan, and I was thinking of getting
another one.  It's going to be pretty crowded.

I'll try reassigning the Wacom, and see if that helps any, and keep the group
posted.   :)   I really love the Gimp, I was getting along just fine learning
how to use it.

Thanks again

Allison Sage

> --
> Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
> Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /  Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
> http://www.brainbench.com     /   Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
> -----------------------------/    I hit a seg fault....


------------------------------

From: "Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Samba] host allow
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:44:49 +0800

Hi,

I have a Lan which have available IP address from 192.168.0.2. -
192.168.0.254.

I want to share a directory for 192.168.0.2. to 192.168.0.80, but not for
the others?

what should be the host allow grammar?
and must I "host deny" the rest?

Thanks very much.




------------------------------

From: "renegade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help on NIS, please
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:38:44 -0300

Hi all,

I have a problem with NIS. My clientes was configured to mount their /home
directories from server.
The following message appear in the server when the clients logon:
"fh_verify: home/test permission failure, acc=4, error=13".
 The strange thing is: all clients mount and authenticate normally  without
problem.
What's matter this message?

Tks,

--



------------------------------

From: John Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Get rid of localhost?
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:29:58 -0400

I recently installed Redhat 6.2, and somewhere along the way missed
an instruction.  As a result, my machine thinks it's "localhost", which 
isn't very helpful.  I've been running Slackware 96 for years, so
I thought I knew how to fix the problem.  Replace "localhost" in 
/etc/HOSTNAME with jjc.groveton.com  and maybe do something similar
in /etc/hosts.  So I did those things, and the next time I booted,
the prompt still showed "localhost".  I checked /etc/HOSTNAME and 
discovered it had been rewritten at bootup, and my changes had been
wiped out.  Couldn't believe that, but I repeated it and the same thing
happened.  Any suggestions on how to change the HOSTNAME on this
newfangled Linux box? 

John Carroll

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:54:52 -0400
From: Glitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linksys router,@home, need help!!

read the cable modem howto at www.linuxdocs.org

peter s wrote:
> 
> Hi folks, i have just finished an install of Mandrake7.0, this is my first
> time using Linux, so there are many things to learn.I would like to sit down
> and read and try as i go along, i learned windows this way and hopefully i
> can do the same with Mandrake, but before i start I wish to accomplish one
> thing.....
> 
>  Getting my internet set up. I  have a cable modem, running through  a
> Linksys cable router/firewall. The pc is dual booted with win98, the win98
> config is on a network with a laptop and a couple more pc downstairs in my
> roomates rooms. These are all validated with another pc running NT server.
>  this is a relatively simle setup to share my cable modem wiht the others
> and to play a few LAN games etc, nothing too serious.) The Linksys router
> acts also as a DHCP server and dishes out all the IP info, in windows i
> simply name my pc's, point the default gateway to the router,the subnet mask
> is my @home subnet on all the machines, the DNS entry has one for the router
> and two more which match my ISP's. This was not too hard to set up, the
> Router pretty much takes care of all the IP stuff and after configuring some
> accounts and shares on the NT box everything worked really well, Ok, but
> lets get to Linux, I am not sure what's going to happen here, i dont know if
> i can set up the linux box to be seen in the network neigbourhood or not, i
> dont even know if this is at all possible, to be honest i dont really care
> but it would be nice. What i really want is a connection to the internet,
> and email and i will be content. My adaptor was found during the install and
> is eth1 in the config window, i use Drakconf to set up networking, is this
> ok? a better way maybe? anyhow, in the Basic Host Info box, there are four
> check boxes,
> 
> 1 enabled- if i check this what exactly am i enabling? the three boxes
> below(manual, dhcp,bootp)?
> 2 manual- i am guessing this means i set all the info up "manually"?
> 3 Dhcp- see, i want to click this because i am guessing this tells linux to
> obtain this info from the dhcp server (my router)
> 4 bootp- what the hell is that?
> 
> also, the nt domain i have here is called DOMAIN1, so lets call my new linux
> box LINUX1, now my computer should be called LINUX1.DOMAIN1 should it not?
> and will this come up in the terminal then instead of peter@localhost or
> something like that?
> Basiclly though i am not too worried at the mo about getting my server to
> see the Linux box but i do NEED this internet connection!!
> anyhow, i wil keep trying with this but so far i am getting nowhere fast, i
> cant ping anything except loop back, now i am assuming the Nic card is
> working but have no idea how i would check that? I suspect it is not because
> a loopback ping bypasses the Nic card as far as i know so that dosent really
> help in this case, and, if the card was working (correct drivers etc)  then
> i should at least be able to ping the router? I am not an expert in
> networking by any strectch but i was able to figure it out in windows and
> would love to get it working in Linux so i can have a fully functional Linux
> pc (Internet and Email,plus all the great linux apps)
> 
> so, thanks for reading through all of this and thanks in advance for any
> help you may be able to give me...
> 
> if this helps:  P2 400
>                     256 ram
>                     ati video 8mg
>                     NDC 10/100 fast ethernet
>                     30 gb quantum ide, lots of partitions!
> 
> Peter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook)
Subject: Re: Get rid of localhost?
Date: 4 Oct 2000 05:57:42 GMT

On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:29:58 -0400, John Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>happened.  Any suggestions on how to change the HOSTNAME on this
>newfangled Linux box? 

Change it in /etc/sysconfig/network.

Dave Cook

------------------------------

From: "Henry K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux on Laptop
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:01:02 +0200

Yes. The LInux installs without problems. But how to make this pcmcia card
work? Theres no straight support for this card.
IBM Ethernet creditcard PCMCIA adapter II
I now try this small 'Peanut Linux' dist. and see how it works!
This Windowsbox is realy slow but i need Email and Internet at my work daily
so i have to get this pcmcia card to work on Linux or i'll be doomed to use
windows....

-wmute on windows hell
Robert Heller Wrote.....
>  "Henry Kruuskopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>  In a message on Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:39:32 +0200, wrote :


>I installed older versions of RedHat Linux (before RedHat's installer
>properly supported PCMCIA/network installations).  This is what I did:
>
>I got a copy of Slackware (3.4 I think) and did a *floppy* install of
>the A (base) and N (network) sets.  I partitioned the drive into four
>partitions (I have a 500meg drive):
>
>/dev/hda1 / (root) 64meg
>/dev/hda2  swap   64meg
>/dev/hda3 /usr     256meg
>/dev/hda4 /home    rest of disk
>
>After the minimual slackware install, I got my PCMCIA ethernet card
>working and used ftp under Slackware to copy a minimual RPM set (and
>related support stuff) to the /home fs.  Then did a RedHat install from
>hard drive (re-formating the root and /usr file systems).  I initially
>installed RH 4.2 and latter upgraded to RH 5.2.






------------------------------

From: fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel version in Slackware circa 1995 and RedHat 4.x
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:26:40 GMT

Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Can someone remember off the top of their head what kernel version
: shipped with Slackware back in late 1995? And also in RedHat 4.x?


That would depend on which Slackware you're referring to.

My first Linux experience was with Slackware 2.1, which came with a 
1.1.59 kernel, and I purchased that in early-to-mid '95.

RH 4.0 was 2.0.,er, I think 2.0.18 but couldn't swear to that.
just a sec, lemme look...

yeah, 4.0 came with 2.0.18 and 4.1 with 2.0.27. I don't know what was
on 4.2 since I didn't get that dot-rev.

Fred

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------
    "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of
     heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven."
============================== Matthew 7:21 (niv) =============================

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: slow?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:21:27 GMT

Jeph Herrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

: i'm a new linux/old unix user who has just installed redhat 6.2
: on a cyrix 686/166Hz machine with 64MB ram. it's not
: top dollar hardware, but I'm still a bit discouraged by how
: slow linux runs. using the Gnome/Enlightenment combination,
: it takes palpable seconds to get shell window open, on the order
: of a minute for graphical apps. is this normal?

not having a machine like that one, I cannot say for certain.

But it is a well-known fact that IF you do not have enough cache for
the amount of RAM in your box, that performance becomes absolutely horrid!
Does your system have a big enough cache for 64mb RAM? I don't know where
the limit lies, it may differ from board to board. I've got (and used to
use as my main Linux system) a P90 (old Asus board) with 256Kb of cache,
and it works fine with 32megs of RAM but bumping it up to 40 the performance
becomes absolutely awful. My current board is a FIC VA503+ with 64 megs of
RAM and 1 meg of cache, so of course I've not seen the problem here.

Some BIOS setup programs have settings for the amount of cacheable RAM in 
the system, you may wish to check to make sure it allows all 64megs to 
be cached. Also make sure that all the caches (both onboard the CPU chip
and off-chip cache) are enabled in the setup utility.


: addendum: i installed with 32mb of ram, but doubled this shortly
: thereafter; do i need to tell the kernel something about this? i figured
: since the system monitor tool picked it up, i was set.

And how was the performance before upgrading to 64 megs?

Fred

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------
                      The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, 
                    keeping watch on the wicked and the good.
============================= Proverbs 15:3 (niv) =============================

------------------------------

From: fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing man pages
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:30:07 GMT

Dave Barcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: How do I print man pages.  I tried your standard redirect to an output
: file but all I got was garbage.

Do you mean print to a printer, or save in a file for later perusal?

For the former:

        man -t foo | lpr
or
        man foo | lpr
the first looks a lot prettier and uses less paper.

For the latter, something like:

        man foo | col -b > filename

ought to do it.

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------
   "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
              it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."  
============================ Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ==============================

------------------------------

From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Superblock corrupt!
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:33:38 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NoMadis wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 Svend Olaf Mikkelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >In quite a few cases like this, it is the partition table and not the
> >partition itself, that is damaged. If you want me to evaluate the
> 
> This is true, the partitiontable was completely destroyed.
> The partition was an extended partition with 9 logical partitions in it.
> Howver,I have successfully restored the partitiontable and am able to
> access the data in 8 of 9 partitions.
> 
> one partition however has a damaged superblock, and I have reason to
> believe it really *is* a damaged superblock.
> The partition cannot be mounted anymore, and e2fsck complains about a
> damaged superblock and missing magicnumbers.
> 
> I have tried to access the page you mentioned
> (inet.uni2.dk/~/svolaf/utilities.html)

This is not the page svend-olaf mentioned!
The page still exists and can be accessed.

Eric

> I regret to tell you that a user svolaf is unknown at that adress,
> and that the sysadmin has assigned your homedirectory and its
> utilities to /dev/null.
> 
> --
> Greetz,
> Joop
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Joop Bollen.   Nuts & Bolts Department,    Nomadis Systems, Holland
> We all live under the same sky, but we don't all have the same horizon.

------------------------------

From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CTRL-ALT-DELETE
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:38:38 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jos� Luis Guisado wrote:
> 
> Eric wrote:
> > You could change the -now argument to +1 and then it'll wait 1 minute
> > after you hit ctrl-alt-delete before it will actually reboot.
> 
> That works, but I'm interested in the '-t sec' option to see if it gives
> more time to the processes to end correctly, because the system is a
> proxy server (quite loaded), and very often has to run fsck (that is:
> the filesystems get damaged) after rebooting with ctrl-alt-delete.
> With the '+1' option, it's all the same, because it justs waits one
> minute and then actually shuts down in the same way as before.
> 
> I tried to include an space between -t and the number of seconds as Lew
> suggested, but it doesn't work either.
> 
> Help will be appreciated!!
> 
> Thanks,
> Jose Luis
> --
> **************************************************************
> Jos� Luis Guisado Lizar
> Centro de C�lculo
> Escuela Universitaria Polit�cnica
> Universidad de Sevilla
> http://www.eup.us.es/personal/guisado
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel.: 954 55 28 21
> **************************************************************

It has been a while since I tried, but IIRC the warning came 5 seconds
before the actual reboot. But then again I still was logged in. Does it
work when you are logged in? (I don't think I can give you much more
help with this, good luck)

Eric

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to