Linux-Misc Digest #902, Volume #26 Tue, 23 Jan 01 22:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: /etc/resolv.conf being overwritten with Red Hat Linux 6.2.3 ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: enlightenment in SuSE 7.0? ("Dave Spence")
I need PHP writers and linux admins to make some web services ("Senol Yilmaz")
Legal status of Tux artwork ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Is VPN masquerade patch present in 2.4 kernel? (Aaron Ginn)
Re: Linux not free anymore? (Dennis Brown)
Re: mounting as nonroot? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Debian 'Woody' (Simon Reye)
Re: Debian 'Woody' (Steve Lamb)
Re: in gcc void main()? (Hartmann Schaffer)
Re: Partition overlapped (Hartmann Schaffer)
Re: Linux not free anymore? (JCA)
EASY linux question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: slocate.cron error message (Fu)
Re: slocate.cron error message (Tim Faircloth)
rpm extract files? ("Ed Aihua Wu")
Re: "Home" in Konqueror
Re: Dell Optiplex GX110, Rage 128 Pro ("doug.nick")
Re: Linux not free anymore? (Steve Ackman)
HP new palmtop is running RedHat? (E J)
Re: Linux not free anymore? (Roger Blake)
Re: Debian 'Woody' (John Hasler)
Re: I need PHP writers and linux admins to make some web services (Steve Ackman)
Re: rpm extract files? (Steve Ackman)
Re: Real Player 7 plugin problem with Netscape 6. (Dave)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: /etc/resolv.conf being overwritten with Red Hat Linux 6.2.3
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:54:12 +0100
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> BUT I have a big problem connecting to my dial-up ISP. I push the
>> ModemLights applet to connect, and that runs /usr/sbin/usernetctl ppp0
>> up to make a connection. This part works. What does not work is that
>> whenever I connect, it overwrites my /etc/resolv.conf with the addresses
>> of my ISP's primary and secondary name servers. Since I want the
>> resolver to use my name server (and have that use the ISP's name server
>> if necessary), this confuses my name server and nothing works. It is
>> simple enough to fix /etc/resolv.conf to what I want, but my machine
>> sometimes connects using a script run by cron, and I cannot be around
>> for those. Besides, it sucks.
I agree. You want to have 127.0.0.1 as the nameserver entry in
resolv.conf, and set up a forwarders entry in named.conf when you
connect using some script magic and a killall -1 named ... actually,
I suspect you either don't need to reference your ISP's nameservers
at all, ever (you might as well hit on some open nameserver elsewhere)
or you can _always_ forward to them. After all if you can't get through
to them, you're not on the net, so who cares ...
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Dave Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: enlightenment in SuSE 7.0?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:23:32 -0800
I just installed Enlightenment last night in SuSE7.0. It seems to work fine
with Gnome. I used YaST and set the instillation medium to FTP.
(Enlightenment is on ftp.suse.com even though its not on the CD.)
Dave
>Doh! I just installed SuSE 7.0, and Enlightenment is not in the distro.
Sawfish is used as >the defalt Gnome WM. I tried to install E off my SuSE
6.3 disc, but it looks like some of >the libraries it looks for have moved
in 7.0. My question is this: Has anyone installed the >current download
version of E on 7.0? Does it work? I'm on a dialup connection, so I >hope
to save the heart- ache of an hour-long download if it won't work.
>Thanks!
>
>ef
>
>A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking.
>
>N = N* fp ne fl fi fc fL
------------------------------
From: "Senol Yilmaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.php,alt.php.sql,ar.linux,at.linux,aus.computers.linux,be.comp.os.linux,bremnet.linux,ch.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,cz.comp.linux,de.comp.lang.php,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,es.comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: I need PHP writers and linux admins to make some web services
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:33:12 +0200
I'm going to give services like web and email forwarding, email groups,
banner exchange etc. on my linux server. I need people who can write PHP or
help installation of ready programs and scripts. I can't pay you now but I
want to share revenues obtained from the web sites.
If you are interested please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Legal status of Tux artwork
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:25:47 GMT
What is the legal status of the Tux (Linux penguin) artwork? Is it
public domain, GPL or some other license? The reason that I'm asking is
that I'd like to sell tee shirts incorporating Tux, and want to ensure
that it's legal before spending any money on prototypes.
Please send any private responses to domain acm (at) org, user shmuel.
--
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
"A BIND is a terrible thing to waste"
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Aaron Ginn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is VPN masquerade patch present in 2.4 kernel?
Date: 23 Jan 2001 16:03:07 -0700
Does anyone know if the VPN masquerade kernel patch has made it's way
into the 2.4 kernel? This is the patch that allows a user to connect
to a VPN through a Linux firewall. Previously, the 2.2 kernel had to
be patched to allow this functionality. I'm wondering if this has
been fixed for the new kernel series.
TIA,
Aaron
--
Aaron J. Ginn Phone: 480-814-4463
Motorola SemiCustom Solutions Pager: 877-586-2318
1300 N. Alma School Rd. Fax : 480-814-4463
Chandler, AZ 85226 M/D CH260 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis Brown)
Subject: Re: Linux not free anymore?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:12:49 -0500
Lew Pitcher wrote:
> And I thought that Ontario politicians were greedy <g>. I hope that
> other political jurisdictions don't get the same idea; I can just see
> some provincial government politician deciding to increase the income
> tax of pedestrians because "the commutter costs (automobile/public
> transit) that they did not have to pay because they walked is like
> income, and should be taxed as such". <g>
Like the Pearson airport deal. Where the taxpayers are expected
to recompense the future profits that the consortium expected to get.
A Privat Sektor "futures" tax. :-)
> It's tactics like this (sales tax on a costless item) that gives
> politicians (rightly) a bad name. P'haps it's time for "Open Source
> Politics" <g>
Or service charges for depositors that give banks (rightly) such a
bad name. Maybe it's time for "Open Source Banks". :-)
> Lew Pitcher
> Information Technology Consultant
> Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group
> (Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
(Ditto.)
--
Dennis Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mounting as nonroot?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:45:15 GMT
Lew, Pbloomgren, and Doc Evil -- thanks for the responses.
Unfortunately, I fear the problem runs deeper than attributions in the
fstab file. My fstab file, below, used to work. Now, without
modification to the fstab file, the devices in the last 5 lines won't
mount at all as a nonroot user: (c.f. error described earlier, in the
requoted part of the post)
/dev/hda1 /dos umsdos defaults 0 0
/dev/hda2 /voroskigan ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hda3 /home ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/hdb1 / ext2 defaults 1 1
/dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hdb3 /usr ext2 defaults 1 2
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/fd0 /floppy auto noauto,user 0 0
/dev/hdc /cdrom auto ro,noauto,user,exec 0 0
/dev/scd0 /cdrom2 iso9660 rw,noauto,user,exec 0 0
/dev/sda4 /dzip vfat rw,user,noauto,exec,umask=100
/dev/sda1 /zip ext2 rw,user,noauto,exec
Really stumped here... Any ideas?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:07:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >When I try to mount a device (e.g. -- floppy & zip disks) as nonroot,
> >I get the following error:
> >
> > mount: must be superuser to use mount
> >
> >Can anybody suggest the bst way to enable user access to the mount
> >command?
>
> add the device and mountpoint to your fstab, with options 'user'
> and a user will be able to mount by naming the mountpoint.
>
> 'man mount' and look for the paragraph that starts "Normally, only the
> superuser can mount file systems. However, when fstab contains the
> user option on a line, then anybody can mount the corresponding
> system."
>
> Lew Pitcher
> Information Technology Consultant
> Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> (Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Simon Reye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Debian 'Woody'
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:05:50 +1100
I know Debian says it releases when it releases which is far enough.
Sounds very much like the kernel anyway. But what I would like to know
is how development is going. I can't seem to find that information
anywhere. RedHat hasn't reached .2 yet so on past performances is not
completely stable but I would love to have a fully developed distro with
the latest and greatest kernel, XFree86, gcc etc.
Can anyone tell me how things are going with 'woody' or better still and
personal idea on the ETA of 'woody'.
Simon
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Lamb)
Subject: Re: Debian 'Woody'
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:18:42 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:05:50 +1100, Simon Reye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>anywhere. RedHat hasn't reached .2 yet so on past performances is not
>completely stable but I would love to have a fully developed distro with
>the latest and greatest kernel, XFree86, gcc etc.
There is no such thing unless you compile your own.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
===============================+=============================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Subject: Re: in gcc void main()?
Date: 23 Jan 2001 19:22:01 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, john connolly wrote:
>Is it possible to declare main to return void instead of int? Using gcc
>version 2.95.2 when I do:
>void main()
>{etc}
>it appears that the compiler ignores the keyword void, it insists that
as other people have pointed out: the ANSI standard prescribes main to be
int, otherwise there shouldn't be a problem. a few years ago you saw it
quite frequently, esp. when people started to move there C programs from
DOS to unices
>return be followed by type int.
in an environment where every program, esp shells, expect a return code
and check for it, you should be glad that the compiler doesn't let you
return some garbage as exit code
hs
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Partition overlapped
Date: 23 Jan 2001 19:38:08 -0500
In article <94k129$nlf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Werner Fangmeier (ESN Bochum) wrote:
>In article <Q9H56.12523$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Eric en Jolanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >...
>> > Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2491 cylinders
>> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>> >
>> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> > /dev/hda1 1 64 514048+ 83 Linux
>> > /dev/hda2 65 319 2048287+ 83 Linux
>> > /dev/hda3 * 320 1057 5927985 c Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
>> > /dev/hda4 1058 2491 11518605 f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
>> > /dev/hda5 * 2085 2491 3269196 b Win95 FAT32
>> > /dev/hda6 1058 2084 8249314+ 83 Linux
>> >
>> > Confusing, right?
>>
>> Not really. I just don't get it how people keep creating logicals
>like this.
>
>Well, not "people" create these tables, it's poorly written utility
not even that: it is utility software. according to the specs, a hard
drive can have up to (exactly?) 4 primary partitions. secondary partitions
are contained in a primary partition. check hda4: it says it is an extended
partition (thats the primary partition that seves as a container for the
secondaries, and both hda5 and hda6 are contained in it: no overlap
>software; I was able to create overlapping partitions simply by
>creating a primary and secondary partitions using Partition Magic
>(which is one of the best-known partitioning utility), and then a linux
>distro setup created inside the extended 2 linux ext2 and 1 linux swap
>partition. This rather simple scenario was sufficient to create such a
>table.
hs
------------------------------
From: JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux not free anymore?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:46:41 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but one thing bugs me about all this: so if the commies are still in
> power and doing commie things, what was all that 1989 stuff?
Are you so gullible that you think all the people that were in
positions of power and social influence in the former Iron Curtain
countries have been brushed aside for good? Or to believe that
whole generations that have been subjected to relentless indoctrination
are going to change their ways just like that?
While the communists cannot impose their tyranny in those
countries any more, their influence is not gone.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EASY linux question
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:47:49 GMT
hello linux wizards:
whenever i enter:
vi -g
in 'hopes' of getting vim to behave in a gui mode under GNOME, i get the
message:
"not compiled with gui option"
any thoughts or ideas?? i would love to use the gui mode vim.
thx,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: git.unix.linux
Subject: Re: slocate.cron error message
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:18:26 -0500
is there a "scandisk" for linux?? or should i just use chkdsk in win2k?
Jehsom wrote:
> In git.unix.linux Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> File system panic (dev 03:01 )
>> FAT error
>> File system has ben set read-only
>> Directory 32165: Bad FAT
>
>
>> how do i correct the error??
>
>
> Sounds like you need to run scandisk on that dos drive.
>
> Moshe
--
know Jesus, know peace... no Jesus, no peace.
fu
------------------------------
From: Tim Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: git.unix.linux
Subject: Re: slocate.cron error message
Date: 24 Jan 2001 01:37:21 GMT
In git.unix.linux Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a "scandisk" for linux?? or should i just use chkdsk in win2k?
type "fschk" at the cosole. anything that runs in windows can't see
the linux partitions.
/tim
--
"I'd rather be a pessimist proved wrong then an optimist proved wrong."
------------------------------
From: "Ed Aihua Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: rpm extract files?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:48:51 -0800
How to extract the files of a rpm files without
install the package?
I want to extract the files to a some directory.
I tried:
rpm -i --force --root dir xxx.rpm
it doesn't work.
e.g.
[root@quark /tmp]# rpm -q -l -p newsx-1.3-3.src.rpm
newsx-1.3.spec
newsx-1.3.tar.gz
How can I get the tar.gz file?
Thanks.
Ed Wu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: "Home" in Konqueror
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:50:33 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:44:08 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm sorry if it's an overly trivial
question, but how does one reprogram
>"Home" button in Konqueror
to point to anything but "~" ?
I think Konqueror is a work in progress --
in my version I can't find a way to do this
because Konqueror seems to think of itself
both as a file manager and a browser. It wants
its home file to be ~ and nothing but.
However, in the help pages it says under
Edit in the menubar there should be a choice
"Create New." There you can create a new URL
link, and supposedly you can make a button for
your icon bar that points to any
link somewhere else in the
app.
My Konqueror doesn't have "Create New" under
Edit yet, so I think they haven't finished
that menu. Once it's done you could make a
button for your home URL that would be as
good as a "home" button in any other browser.
I have a new Konqueror on a CDROM here and
as soon as I get time I'm gonna load it
and see if they finished the Edit menu yet.
I'm not sure I yet see the point of making
a file manager and browser into one app, but
maybe I will later.
MP
------------------------------
From: "doug.nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,alt.os.linux.suse
Subject: Re: Dell Optiplex GX110, Rage 128 Pro
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:52:26 +0000
Bill Unruh wrote:
> Trying to install Mandrake 7.1 on a Dell Optiplex GX110 with onboard
> Intel i810 chipset and an add in ATI All in Wonder 128 Pro video card.
> We are having great trouble installing. We cannot figure out how to
> disable the onboard video card-- Dows anyone know?
> We cannot seem to get it to see the ATI 128 Pro card-- is this supported
> in Xfree 3.3.6 or 4.0.1?
>
> Help.
go to http://www.dell.com and check out the manuals on line. they have the
service manuals for studying. to be a dell technician there.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Ackman)
Subject: Re: Linux not free anymore?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:36:24 -0500
On 22 Jan 2001 23:42:59 +0900, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>not to mention no regulation (gasp!), no courts, and hence, no way of
>arbitrating disputes between the net.libertarians themselves.
All the founding fathers were Libertarians, yet they
managed to devise a Constitution with courts, import duties
and excise taxes.
>lack
>of education would mean no market for computers, software, the net.
Gee... Thomas Jefferson never went to public school.
I wonder how he ever managed to learn anything without it.
>the thing about libertarian capitalists is that most of them don't
>understand that things like regulation and taxes benefit them quite a
>bit.
The first thing about socialists is that they don't understand
libertarianism. The second thing is that they don't understand
that regulation and taxes harm everyone more than they benefit.
--
Steve Ackman
http://twovoyagers.com
Registered Linux User #79430
------------------------------
From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: HP new palmtop is running RedHat?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:10:01 GMT
I was thinking about getting a linux palmtop. The only I would consider
was the Compaq IPAQ, so it would dual boot Windows CE or Linux or be
made to run Linux only.
Now there is a rumor that HP has a new palmtop running Redhat Linux.
http://www.brighthand.com/html/features/hppda.html
It would be interesting cross compiling open source code and making it
fit on a small screen.
I hope it has as good calculator as an HP48SX.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roger Blake)
Subject: Re: Linux not free anymore?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:15:26 GMT
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:46:41 -0800, JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While the communists cannot impose their tyranny in those
>countries any more, their influence is not gone.
Particularly in places like China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. A very
large number of people are still under communist rule -- I'm not
sure where people get the idea that "the cold war is over and
communism is dead."
--
Roger Blake
(remove second "g" and second "m" from address for email)
------------------------------
From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian 'Woody'
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:07:38 GMT
Simon Reye writes:
> ...the latest and greatest kernel...
If you want a new kernel, install it. Kernels are not specific to
distributions or their versions.
> Can anyone tell me how things are going with 'woody' or better still and
> personal idea on the ETA of 'woody'.
My personal WAG is that Debian 2.3 will be out in three to six months.
BTW you might want to consider Debian's 'testing' distribution (which is
what 'woody' presently points to). Packages are moved from 'unstable' to
'testing' when they have been free of serious bugs for two weeks and all
their dependencies can be satisfied. Just install 2.2, put
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
in your /etc/apt/sources.list, and do
apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Ackman)
Crossposted-To:
alt.php,alt.php.sql,ar.linux,at.linux,aus.computers.linux,be.comp.os.linux,bremnet.linux,ch.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,cz.comp.linux,de.comp.lang.php,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,es.comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: I need PHP writers and linux admins to make some web services
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:14:52 -0500
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:33:12 +0200, Senol Yilmaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm going to give services like web and email forwarding, email groups,
>banner exchange etc. on my linux server. I need people who can write PHP or
>help installation of ready programs and scripts. I can't pay you now but I
>want to share revenues obtained from the web sites.
>If you are interested please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm... while ad revenues were $20/1000 impressions about three
or four years ago, and worthwhile pursuing, I hate to tell you that
ad space is running around ONE dollar per thousand these days. If
that's how you're planning on making any money, you might as well
forget it. Why do you think so many dot-coms are going out of
business?
--
Steve Ackman
http://twovoyagers.com
Registered Linux User #79430
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Ackman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: rpm extract files?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:23:14 -0500
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:48:51 -0800, Ed Aihua Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How to extract the files of a rpm files without
>install the package?
>I want to extract the files to a some directory.
>
>I tried:
>rpm -i --force --root dir xxx.rpm
>it doesn't work.
>
>e.g.
>[root@quark /tmp]# rpm -q -l -p newsx-1.3-3.src.rpm
>newsx-1.3.spec
>newsx-1.3.tar.gz
>How can I get the tar.gz file?
1) Fire up mc.
2) Highlight/enter on the package.
3) Highlight/enter CONTENTS.cpio
4) Navigate to whatever file you're interested in
5) F5
6) type in the path where you want it
7) Click OK
--
Steve Ackman
http://twovoyagers.com
Registered Linux User #79430
------------------------------
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Real Player 7 plugin problem with Netscape 6.
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:30:07 -0000
E J wrote:
>
> I have Real Player 7 almost fully working with Netscape 6.
> I have been to a site and the message pops up.
> "Netscape Default Plugin
> This page contains information of a type (audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin)
> that can
> only be viewed with the appropriate Plug-in."
>
> I have used the Helper Applications under Netscape 6.
>
> Description of Type: RealAudio File
> Extension: .rpm
> MIME Type: audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin
> Handled By Application: /usr/X11R6/bin/realplay
>
> Real Player 7 still won't play on this website.
>
> I tried copying the plugins, (raclass.zip and rpnp.so) into
> /usr/local/netscape/plugins but Real Player 7
> still won't play on this website.
>
>
I know this won't help, but, I have the same problem
w/RP-8/Linux/Netscape(6), have yet to fix things, or find a USENET hit on
anyone who has. Anyone out there got RP-7 or 8 working w/Netscape and Linux?
Thanks,
Dave Gee
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
