Linux-Misc Digest #489, Volume #27               Fri, 30 Mar 01 22:13:02 EST

Contents:
  Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp. (Mighty Man at earthlink dot net)
  Re: Tips: Debian is very good (= (Noah Roberts)
  Re: jetdirect and linux. ("kenny@bui")
  Formatting a partition in Linux? (KCmaniac)
  Slide Show?? (Jim Bradley)
  Re: Formatting a partition in Linux? (Juergen Heinzl)
  Indrema Article in CCN (William Kendrick)
  Re: Slide Show?? (Noah Roberts)
  Re: Swiching between Linux and Windows (root)
  Making Getty work with the serial port COM1 ("Siddharth Vajirkar")
  Re: Formatting a partition in Linux? (KCmaniac)
  Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp. (Brian V. Smith)
  Windows->Java->Linux (Alexander Lashenko)
  Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp. (Brian V. Smith)
  Re: Large File Problems... 
(=?iso-8859-7?Q?=D6=E1=ED=EF=F5=F1=E3=DC=EA=E7=F2=20=CC=E1=ED=FE=EB=E7=F2?=)
  Re: system.map ("green")
  Re: bzip, rpm files in Windows (Dennis Rasey)
  Re: QT install problem (Victor Dods)
  Re: ANSI display clobbered - request fix ("Steven J. Hathaway")
  LINUX informational page (MerefBast)
  Re: system.map ("Steven J. Hathaway")
  Re: difference between ext2fs and raiserfs (Dances With Crows)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mighty Man at earthlink dot net
Crossposted-To: alt.windows-me,alt.windows98,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:06:44 -0500

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:27:49 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D'Arque
Bishop) wrote:

>>Actually, I was replying to a post deploring the security of Windows
>>compared to Linux. The post was comparing apples to oranges. Windows can be
>>very secure, much more so than Linux, as long as increased management is
>>taken into consideration. There are secure operating systems and less secure
>>operating systems. Windows 9x was never intended to be secure from the
>>outset. Windows 2000, on the other hand, with EFS, IpSec, L2TP, and a host
>>of other security measures, can be configured to be quite secure.
>
>I'm just kinda curious... where do you get this info that a Windows 2K 
>machine can be made "much more" secure than Linux?  What would make this
>secure Windows box more secure than a secure Linux box?

1. disconnect all cables

2. remove CD Rom, hard drive and floppy

3. disconnect and remove monitor and smash with sledgehammer

4. remove all memory chips and PCI cards

5. remove all keys from keyboard and replace with chicklets

6. cover entire computer with 3 layers of aluminum foil

7. dig a 15 to 20 meter whole and place computer in it.

8 fill hole with concrete and metal chaff

9 after cement is dry build a McDonalds or Starbucks on top of it


Windows is now secure!




------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:22:59 -0800
From: Noah Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tips: Debian is very good (=

>  Slack I would not reccoment for beginners, as it is to
> "basic" and lack several of the configuartion tools that newbies would
> like. It also lacks a powerfull packeaging system like .deb or .rpm.

What was it exactly that opinions are like?


------------------------------

From: "kenny@bui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: jetdirect and linux.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:23:22 -0500
Reply-To: "kenny@bui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

thanks for the replies.

"Kenny@BUI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:eIMw6.3151$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hello guys,
> have any of you worked with hp jetdirect printers being shared through
linux
> or samba?
> is it similar to setting up a remote smb printer attached to a win98
client.
> does the jetdirect use netbios names? are the jetdirect printers
independant
> of the winNT or win98 computer running the jetdirect software?
>
> thank you,
> kenny.
>
>
>



------------------------------

From: KCmaniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Formatting a partition in Linux?
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:33:43 -0500

Is there an Linux equivalent to the "format" command in DOS?

I want to clear a partition of all its data.  I have looked and looked
and have not seen anything in Linux that does this for you.  Is it
possible that "mkfs" does this?  This command is supposed to make an
ext2 filesystem.  What does it do to an already existing ext2 file
system?  Does it clear all the data and then "remake" the file system?
If not how does one "format" a Linux partition?  Thanks.

RLH


------------------------------

From: Jim Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slide Show??
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:18:26 -0600

I want to create a slide show of jpg images with an approximately 10
second interval between slides. Is there an easy Linux solution? Or a
simple javascript solution to enable a browser to do it? I can always
reload OS/2 on my laptop, and dig out PMView, but I want an easier
solution that that!! Thanks.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: Formatting a partition in Linux?
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:46:49 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, KCmaniac wrote:
>Is there an Linux equivalent to the "format" command in DOS?
>
>I want to clear a partition of all its data.  I have looked and looked
>and have not seen anything in Linux that does this for you.  Is it
>possible that "mkfs" does this?  This command is supposed to make an
>ext2 filesystem.  What does it do to an already existing ext2 file
>system?  Does it clear all the data and then "remake" the file system?
>If not how does one "format" a Linux partition?  Thanks.
[-]
You use a fs specific program like mke2fs (mkfs is just a wrapper
application).

It does not really clear the partition of data, though. If you want
to clear out a partition for some reason, then you can do this ...

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda1 bs=512

... for instance and with SCSI drives (sd*). 

In any case make sure whatever you pass to dd is right -- make sure
thrice as if not, then you can in deep s*** pretty quick 8-)

You can use mkswap, too but then you'd have to change the partition
type first.

Ta',
Juergen

-- 
\ Real name     : Juergen Heinzl                \       no flames      /
 \ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /

------------------------------

From: William Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Indrema Article in CCN
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:48:22 GMT

The latest issue (April 2001) of California Computer News (CCN) magazine
a 2 page special feature on the Indrema game console.

For those who haven't noticed it, the Indrema is a DV/Linux-based
game console designed around an x86 architecture.  Along with playing
games, the unit sports DVD and MP3 support, "TiVo"-like features,
web and e-mail access, and a support structure for open source game
development.


The article is also available online, for folks who aren't in California
or are too lazy to go grab a free copy of CCN from the grocery store ;)

  http://www.ccnmag.com/Apr01/feature.htm


Here's Indrema's official site:

  http://www.indrema.com/


-bill!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/bill/indrema/
Indrema Informer


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:15:09 -0800
From: Noah Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Slide Show??

Jim Bradley wrote:

> I want to create a slide show of jpg images with an approximately 10
> second interval between slides. Is there an easy Linux solution? Or a
> simple javascript solution to enable a browser to do it? I can always
> reload OS/2 on my laptop, and dig out PMView, but I want an easier
> solution that that!! Thanks.

freshmeat.net


------------------------------

From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Swiching between Linux and Windows
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:23:04 GMT

In a discussion of  running Winapps on Linux boxes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> There are pros and cons to all of the solutions posted here.
>
> 1. Loadlin is another boot loader. To the best of my knowledge it will not
> let you run Windows without rebooting.
>
> 2. VMWare is the only one which will allow you to run Windows and Linux
> without reinstalling one or the other. Some people say it is too slow and
> too expensive. It also takes alot of resources.
>
> 3. Win4lin installs in you Linux system and you will not be able to run
> you old Windows apps without reinstalling them also. It does not access
> your current Windows file system. It actually allows the new install to
> run in an ext2 file system. You will not have access to most of you
> peripherals. However, you may find it will meet your needs.

Interesting disussion. Let me describe my situation and ask for advice. My
Linux machine is LAN'ed to 3+ others, at least one of which can be running
Windows and unused at any time. It seems to me that by far the simplest
solution  would be to grab the Windows screen over the LAN, put it up as an X
window, and send mouse clicks and keystrokes back. Presto, winapps running at
native speed in full native mode on a linux box. If all this runs on top of
Samba, I could have transparent access to files and printers as well.

This is beyond my programming abilities, but it is not obvious to me that it
is a fundamentally stupid or impractical idea,. Of course, I could simply put
one of the Windows boxes on my desk,  but
a) There is too much crap on my desk already, and
b) I need to be able to cut and paste from one app/os to another.

Does anyone see that this could be implemented in 300 lines of tcl? Has
somebody already done it? Is the whole idea idiotic?

best wishes, mark s,

(and if this shows up as html, my grovelling apologies).



------------------------------

From: "Siddharth Vajirkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Making Getty work with the serial port COM1
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:34:24 -0800

Hi,
I'm trying to get getty to work with the serial port COM1. I have read
through the HOWTO for serial port terminal and I understand the various
steps in there to configure your serial port using setserial, configure
getty using /etc/gettydefs. However I can't get this to work. My setup is a
simple PC (e-machine 633) running RH 6.2 with COM1 connected using a null
modem cable to a laptop running Win 2000 and hyperterminal looking at COM1.
I can say ls ~ > /dev/ttyS0 and the listing of my home directory shows up on
the hyperterminal, but I can't get getty to start on COM1. When I try to
start getty, it waits for a couple of seconds and then just terminates my
telnet session to the linux box.
I tried mgetty, but it just sits there and does not seem to do anything.
I am under the impression that I should be able to ask getty to start with
/dev/ttyS0 and if I hit enter on my hyperterminal session I should get a
login prompt. Is that how this is supposed to work? Any other references I
should check to get this working?

Thanks much!
- Sid



------------------------------

From: KCmaniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Formatting a partition in Linux?
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:48:08 -0500

Thanks Juergen for you response:

Juergen Heinzl wrote:

>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda1 bs=512

What is /dev/zero??  Is this supposed to mean write zeros as standard input
to sda1, 512 bytes at a time?  Again what is /dev/zero?

>
> You can use mkswap, too but then you'd have to change the partition
> type first.

This seems rather cumbersome in that you mean I would have to use fdisk and
change the device ID to Linux swap or 82 and then use mkswap on it?  Then
change the ID back to Linux Native or 83?

Thanks.

RLH


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian V. Smith)
Crossposted-To: alt.windows-me,alt.windows98,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp.
Date: 31 Mar 2001 01:01:02 GMT

In article <9a27bg$h95$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dan Forsythe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
writes:
|> Actually, I was replying to a post deploring the security of Windows
|> compared to Linux. The post was comparing apples to oranges. Windows can be
|> very secure, much more so than Linux, as long as increased management is
|> taken into consideration. There are secure operating systems and less secure
|> operating systems. Windows 9x was never intended to be secure from the
|> outset. Windows 2000, on the other hand, with EFS, IpSec, L2TP, and a host
|> of other security measures, can be configured to be quite secure.

Oh, come on!  Saying something over and over again doesn't make it true.
ALL versions of Windows are far less secure than *ANY* version of Unix/Linux/etc.

-- 
===============================================================
Brian V. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www-epb.lbl.gov/BVSmith
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
I don't speak for LBL; they don't pay me enough for that.
Check out the xfig site at http://www-epb.lbl.gov/xfig

 To the optimist, the glass is half full. To the pessimist, the  
 glass is half empty. To the engineer, the glass is too small
 for a decent safety factor.

------------------------------

From: Alexander Lashenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Windows->Java->Linux
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 01:13:14 GMT

Hi,
Take a look at http://www.unixspace.com/tools - I bet you have never
seen anything like this!
(Best viewed in 1280x1024 resolution).  Graphic user interface with a
SSH connection looks quite nice.
If you are looking for a way to access your Linux PC through the
Internet using a great looking interface
you can download it right now.

Alex.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian V. Smith)
Crossposted-To: alt.windows98,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Windows ME and Windows 98 and Linux comp.
Date: 31 Mar 2001 01:03:22 GMT

In article <5D4x6.3104$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
writes:
|> I am canceling all pending contracts, and will no longer do business with
|> Raytheon.

Can't take the heat, huh Sam?

-- 
===============================================================
Brian V. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www-epb.lbl.gov/BVSmith
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
I don't speak for LBL; they don't pay me enough for that.
Check out the xfig site at http://www-epb.lbl.gov/xfig

 To the optimist, the glass is half full. To the pessimist, the  
 glass is half empty. To the engineer, the glass is too small
 for a decent safety factor.

------------------------------

From: =?iso-8859-7?Q?=D6=E1=ED=EF=F5=F1=E3=DC=EA=E7=F2=20=CC=E1=ED=FE=EB=E7=F2?= 
Subject: Re: Large File Problems...
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 04:55:10 +0300

There is a `largefile' topic at man pages. Maybe it will help you.

Fred Pishotta wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In another posting session I received help [thanks, folks] figuring out
> why I was having problems with files greater than ((2^31) - 1) bytes.
> That is: linux wouldn't create them.  I now know that this historically
> relates to the 32 bit Intel architecture, and that the linux 2.4 kernel
> addresses this matter by implementing a 64(?) bit filesize discriptor,
> as does an LF patch to earlier versions.
>
> So I grabbed the sources for the 2.4.2 kernel, built myself a shiny
> new one, and brought it up in the context of my RH 7.0 distribution.
> Seems to work fine to a point.  I can now do things like create
> big files with commands like "cat file1 file2 file3 > file4" and
> the os doesn't complain, but other things do.  "more file4", as a
> trivial example, will complain about the file size and fail to do
> it's thing.  "gunzip file.Z" works, though, when the resulting file
> "file" would exceed the ~2G limit (not sure about when file.Z is
> bigger than 2G).  "vi fileb" fails (and deletes fileb!) if fileb is > 2G.
>
> So clearly the problem is not fixed by simply having an LF kernel.
> It must extend down into other packages.  My question is:
> How can I get a handle on the extent of the problem?  Is anyone producing
> a LF compliant linux distribution at this point?  RedHat "wolverine"
> (which I have tested) is not.  Obviously to do so is going to involve a
> compliant glibc and a lot of recoding/recompiling of tool packages.
> What about FreeBSD? (I'm starting to get dizzy.)
>
> Why, you may ask, do I want to deal with files that big?  We want
> to port some genome database technologies (e.g. the NCBI's BLAST
> package [ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/ ]) that works with other unix
> architectures (e.g., SPARC/Solaris) over into the much more cost-effective
> Intel/linux.  (Interestingly enough, they "have" a linux port, but it only
> works with the smaller databases, not the big ones like the Human Genome
> Database.)  I suppose we could spend the big bucks on a more commercial
> big-biz solution, but such a port would be a tremendous boon to molecular
> biologists world-wide.  We're interested in taking on such a project,
> if we can understand its scope and depth, and determine that we would not
> drown in the process.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -- Fred P.


------------------------------

From: "green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: system.map
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:12:20 +1000

Question what do you do if you have multi versions of kernels ? e.g. 2.2,
2.4, different configs etc.

System map can't match all.

"Michael Heiming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
> >
> > Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Wong Ching Kuen Frederick wrote:
> > >>
> > >> what is the use of the file /boot/system.map?! after compiling a new
kernel,
> > >> should i copy this file to /boot as well?!
> >
> > > Yes, you should, it's the first place klogd looks for this file.
> >
> > It doesn't matter. Klogd doesn't need it, and he doesn't need the output
> > of klogd when it does use it :-).
> >
> > GGGPeter
>
> I'm not sure, what you said should be true for loadable modules, where
modprobE
> informs
> klogd about symbol information. But for the part of the kernel that is
static
> build, klogd
> will need System.map (according to the man page)?
>
> Anyway, were are talking about ~250 KB and it can't be wrong to copy
System.map to
> /boot.
>
> Regards
>
> Michael Heiming



------------------------------

From: Dennis Rasey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bzip, rpm files in Windows
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 02:17:19 GMT

On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:24:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thaddeus L
Olczyk) wrote:

>OK. Sorry to bring up "the other platform", but since
>bzip and rpm are Linux tools I feel this forum is appropriate.
>Are there any tools out there that will allow me to view bzip
>and rpm files on Windows, similar to WinZip?

Thad,
There's a program called Power Archiver
(http://powerarchiver.efront.com/)
It says it'll do bzip2 (I have no idea what the difference between
bzip & bzip2).
It does not mention RPM's though.

Hope this helps.

Dennis

------------------------------

From: Victor Dods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: QT install problem
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:40:34 -0800

Collin Borrlewyn wrote:

> I don't know if this is the appropriate place to ask (since this is a
> linux newsgroup, and not a QT newsgroup) but I don't know where else
> to look, so here I ask...
> 
> In short, before installing QT I need to set some environment
> variables, but I don't know to what.
> 
> In length:
> I have a copy of Red Hat 5.2, which I got from a book in my local
> library. This is currently all I can afford, since I haven't got the
> money to purchace a copy or the bandwidth to download something
> better. I installed RH5 on an old system, and have been having a grand
> old time. After a while I got a book titled Mastering Unix out of the
> library for help with some configuration (all of which has worked
> beautifully). This new book had a CD with it containing many things,
> including complete source for KDE (and QT) and Gnome. So, somewhere
> along I got the idea into my head that I'd install KDE. The process
> seemed fairly straightforward, and the book had instructions (of
> sorts) on what to do. But it assumed QT was already installed, so I
> was on my own for that. The trouble is that when I get to the 'make'
> step, it spits out errors amounting to needing environment variables
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, LIBRARY_PATH, and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH to be set. And
> they are not. While the other item that needed to be set (MANPATH) I
> mannaged to figured out, I don't know where to begin on these others.
> 
> So... what should such variables be set to? Why are they not set
> already? And, if this is not a good place, where do I ask?
> 
> ~Collin
> 
> 
> 

I would recommend not compiling from the source, but rather using 
binary RPM files to install it.  I run Redhat 7.0, and had some 
problems when I tried to install QT and then KDE from the source tar.gz 
packages.  Anyway, the complete instructions and rpm files are at 
http://www.kde.org/announcements/announce-2.1.1.html 
I've found that RPMs are generally a better solution.  They are smaller 
than source packages, take far less time to install, and are easy to 
install/uninstall.  Anyway, good luck!

Victor Dods


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:38:42 -0800
From: "Steven J. Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: ANSI display clobbered - request fix

Thanks all for your prompt help.
I'm sure that many newsgroup readers will be helped.

Sincerely,
Steven J. Hahaway


"Steven J. Hathaway" wrote:

> I have misplaced the magic character sequence that can be issued to
> repair
> a screen that has been garbaged by printing a binary executable file or
> binary
> data file.
>
> If someone knows where I can either obtain the magic character sequence
> or provide information on ANSI display programming, please respond to
> this
> newsgroup.
>
> Sincerely,
> Steven J. Hathaway


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MerefBast)
Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:45:31 GMT
Subject: LINUX informational page

   Hi. Sorry to bother everyone, but I need help.

   I am the author of an educational web site about 
operating systems < http://www.operatingsystems.net >. 
Although I don't provide a lot of depth on any one 
operating system (I'm still working on it), I do provide a
fairly comprehensive overview and comparison of operating 
systems (particularly server operating systems).

   High traffic has forced the site to move from several 
different ISPs. The current ISP can handle the traffic, 
but I can't afford their rates.

   As a result, it is highly likely that the web site will
close down on April 5th.

   If anyone wants to save a copy of the web site to their
disks before the shut down date, then they need to visit 
the web site before then. I currently have a set of three 
ZIP files of the site as of March 25th ready for download,
and will be posting updated ZIP collections on March 31st 
and April 3rd.

   Also, if anyone spots any technical errors or outdated 
information, please notify me immediately, so that I can 
make sure that the information is accurate on the last set
of updates.

   And if anyone can help fund the cost of hosting the web
site, please let me know. I have already received pledges 
for contributions, but not yet enough to keep the web site
around. Individuals can help by sending a check or money 
order to 1-host, 7595 Redwood Blvd, Ste 215, Novota, CA, 
94947 (please clearly indicate on the check that the 
payment is for "OperatingSystems.net", as the ISP has 
thousands of accounts; also do not send cash). If there 
are any businesses that want to sponsor particular web 
pages (or the entire web site) in trade for a prominent 
message, a small icon, and a link, please let me know.

   If you want to check out what is at the web site, you 
may want to try some of the following web pages:

LINUX: http://www.operatingsystems.net/oses/linux.htm

FILE SYSTEMS: http://www.operatingsystems.net/holistic/connect/filesys.htm
HARDWARE SUPPORTED:
http://www.operatingsystems.net/holistic/hardware/hardware.htm
CHARACTER CODES: http://www.operatingsystems.net/system/physical/charcode.htm
ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE PROGRAMMING:
http://www.operatingsystems.net/topic/language/asm.htm
SECURITY: http://www.operatingsystems.net/holistic/security/security.htm
BASICS OF COMPUTERS: http://www.operatingsystems.net/system/physical/basics.htm
COMPARISON OF OPERATING SYSTEMS:
http://www.operatingsystems.net/kind/summary.htm
KINDS OF OPERATING SYSTEMS: http://www.operatingsystems.net/kind/kinds.htm

   I can be contacted at < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >.

    Thanks....


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:51:51 -0800
From: "Steven J. Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: system.map

Wong Ching Kuen Frederick wrote:

> what is the use of the file /boot/system.map?! after compiling a new kernel,
> should i copy this file to /boot as well?! without this file, my system
> still reboot with no problem.

/boot/System.map   is a representation of the defalut kernel symbol table

When the kernel or modules query symbol information for debugging, the files
looked for are:

/boot/System.map-<version-code>
/boot/System.map

I have several kernel versions, and System.map is good for only one version.

/boot/System.map-2.2.13
/boot/System.map-2.2.17
/boot/System.map-2.2.17-20
/boot/System.map-2.4.0
/boot/System.map-2.4.2

This keeps the various kernels and their modules happy.
Modules for the kernels are stored in the respective directories under
/lib/modules

/lib/modules/2.2.13
/lib/modules/2.2.17
/lib/modules/2.2.17-20
/lib/modules/2.2.18
/lib/modules/2.4.0
/lib/modules/2.4.2

Note: that kernel version 2.2.18 has no specified /System.map-2.2.18
represented, therefore
symbols for debugging will come from /boot/System.map.  All kernels boot OK
without the
System.map files, but the presence is invaluable for debugging code.

Hope this helps!
- Steven J. Hathaway






------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: difference between ext2fs and raiserfs
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:58:55 GMT

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:51:30 -0000, Andy Walker staggered into the Black
Sun and said:
>Goophy wrote in message ...
>>whats the difference between ext2fs and raiserfs.
>>and how do these to filesystems work?
>Reiserfs is a journalising file system. This roughly translates as a
>filesystem that is much less succeptable to corruption than ext2. One
>of the main things it does in difference to ext2 is when saving a file
>it verifies that it is saved before deleting the old file. In the event

(NOTE:  I am not a filesystem guru; please feel free to correct me if
I've misrepresented things here.)

?  Not quite... ReiserFS keeps a filesystem log ("journal") and it goes
sort of like this:
0.  Write to log, "I am going to write file X"
1.  Write file X
2.  Remove log entry written in step 0

Filesystem integrity is preserved in almost all cases.  If a crash
occurs during step 0, bad log entries are removed on the next mount.  If
a crash occurs during step 1, on the next mount, the driver checks the
log and writes file X if it hasn't been written yet.  (Note that this
also catches what happens if a crash occurs during step 2!)

Not to mention that it keeps directory entries in a B-tree for efficient
handling of directories that contain a *lot* of files.  This also makes
the operation of tools like "find" very quick.

>Most common distributions such as RedHat, SuSe and Mandrake already
>allow reiserfs even though it is still in it's beta testing stage.
>It's only shortcoming is that I don't believe it is bootable hence you
>will still need an ext2 boot partition.

That's another feature.  ReiserFS does something called "tail packing"
on files, which AFAIK involves moving files around on disk so that the
B-tree is balanced, making for more efficient operation.  Since LILO
must know the exact positions of all the sectors where the kernel image
and the loading map reside.  If ReiserFS shuffles /boot/vmlinuz or
/boot/map around like that, LILO will not be able to find the kernel on
the next boot!

You can work around this by making a ReiserFS /boot partition and
*always* mounting it with the "notail" option.  Recent versions of LILO
can grok this.  Note that you really want to make a /boot partition if
you do this; putting "notail" on / or /usr or /home could cause
performance degradation.


-- 
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /  Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com     /   Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/    I hit a seg fault....

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to