Linux-Misc Digest #947, Volume #27 Sat, 26 May 01 10:13:01 EDT
Contents:
Re: Postscript file corrupted - extracting text/patching (John Thompson)
permission confusion (faeychyld)
Re: Quake3 + XFree86-4.0.3 + Voodoo3 = Death Slow (Andy Furniss)
Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user (Claus Atzenbeck)
Weird problem - Eterm and rxvt use one minute to start up, xterm does not ("Rune
Jacobsen")
Switch from Gnome to KDE ("Buck Turgidson")
Re: Postscript file corrupted - extracting text/patching (Stefano Ghirlanda)
strange partition problem ("Oliver Nussbaum")
SSH problems (Morgoth)
Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user (Michael Heiming)
Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user (Michael Heiming)
Re: kernel 2.4.5 crashes on Mandrake 8 but 2.4.4 and 2.4.3 works (Michael Perry)
ISP backbone ("DMcBee")
Re: strange partition problem (Svend Olaf Mikkelsen)
Re: HELP formated drive (John Hasler)
Re: permission confusion (faeychyld)
Re: ISP backbone (Ian Northeast)
Re: permission confusion (Bob Hauck)
Re: Switch from Gnome to KDE (faeychyld)
Re: HELP formated drive (faeychyld)
Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user (Michael Heiming)
pci modem driver (LT) for Linux wanted ("Guus Ellenkamp")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Postscript file corrupted - extracting text/patching
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:27:43 -0500
Theo van der Merwe wrote:
> I have obtained a Postscript file (apparently generated with Microsoft Word)
> of which I can only read the first page using gv (an error - moveto - is
> generated on the next page). I have the following questions:
>
> a) How do I extract just the text from the Postscript file? How is the raw
> text in a Postscript file encoded?
>
> b) Is it possible to fix a corrupted Postscript file (e.g. by extracting the
> usable portions to a new file)?
>
> Any help with the above would be greatly appreciated.
Have you tried "ps2ascii" (comes with ghostscript)?
PS2ASCII(1) Ghostscript Tools PS2ASCII(1)
NAME
ps2ascii - Ghostscript translator from PostScript or PDF
to ASCII
SYNOPSIS
ps2ascii [ input.ps [ output.txt ] ]
ps2ascii input.pdf [ output.txt ]
DESCRIPTION
ps2ascii uses gs(1) to extract ASCII text from
PostScript(tm) or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF)
files. If no files are specified on the command line, gs
reads from standard input; but PDF input must come from an
explicitly-named file, not standard input. If no output
file is specified, the ASCII text is written to standard
output.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 19:58:10 +1000
From: faeychyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: permission confusion
Permissions always throw me a curve. I thought
if I mounted a drive ( ls120 n this case )
with the user option eg; fstab entry
/dev/hdd /mnt/ls120 auto noauto,user,rw 0 0
then I would own the drive and have rw access.
Not so, the drive is still owned by root with 777 permissions.
Where have I gone wrong?
--
-
-
-
Regards F
------------------------------
From: Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware,3dfx.glide.linux,alt.games.quake3
Subject: Re: Quake3 + XFree86-4.0.3 + Voodoo3 = Death Slow
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:21:37 +0000
Fredrik Olausson wrote:
> I second that - there is something distinctly wrong with the 3dfx
> drivers. I finally got mine working half-decent, but Unreal Tournament
> looked like crap because of the 16 bit colordepth the 3dfx driver uses,
Voodoo 3s don't do 3d in any other depth - it's not the driver.
Andy.
------------------------------
From: Claus Atzenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:52:21 +0200
Michael Heiming wrote on Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 22:37:
> poll <servername> with protocol <POP3> user <username> password
> <password> is <localuser>
Thanks, but my problem is slightly different:
I have one mailbox. In this mailbox are mails to different e-mail
addresses. (They came in e.g. through forwarding from another mailbox.) The
different mails must be delivered to the appropriate local mailbox:
Example:
ISP mailbox -> must be delivered to local mailbox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> thorn@localhost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> john@localhost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> susanne@localhost
The only common thing between the mails in my ISP's mailbox and my local
onces is the name before the @ sign.
I would like to use sendmail's (postfix) multidrop feature. This is my
entry:
*****
user [EMAIL PROTECTED] there with password mysecret is * here
options fetchall stripcr
mda '/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -f %F %T'
*****
The only problem is that fetchmail inserts the whole e-mail address
(including domain) to %T in the mda line.
How can I tell fetchmail just to insert the user name (= name before the @
sign) into %T, so that sendmail will be able to deliver it to the
appropriate user?
Any ideas??
Thanks a lot!!
Claus
------------------------------
From: "Rune Jacobsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Weird problem - Eterm and rxvt use one minute to start up, xterm does not
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:57:07 +0200
Hello.
I'm having a weird problem. When I try to start an Eterm or an rxvt (without
any special options) on my Linux box, weird things happen. It takes about a
minute to start them up! xterm does not have this problem, so I am sticking
to it for the moment. Just for fun I made a script called tst which only
contains the "exit" command, and ran it like this:
time Eterm -e ./tst
I ran it a few times (in the spirit of accurate benchmarking ;D), and every
time it came out pretty close to this:
real 1m0.360s
user 0m0.150s
sys 0m0.030s
In addition, I keep top running in the background to see what goes on - CPU
useage is low (99%++ idle constantly), and I have around 40MB of free RAM
when doing this.
Now, seeing that this is a dual PIII-550MHz box, you'd think opening up a
shell window wouldn't be so tough. It works great for everything else. And
it being so close to one minute (just above) every time I run the test, I am
wondering if it keeps waiting for some event that happens exactly one minute
after running - it is quite suspicious.
I ran the same test with xterm, btw., and it took less than a tenth of a
second to open. I also tried with rxvt, but it didn't feel like executing
the exit command properly, so I had to close the window manually. Needless
to say, this window shared the behaviour of appearing exactly one minute
after I issued the command.
So, anyone got any great ideas? I am running kernel 2.4.4 on a debian woody
system - and this system is just for playing about on, nothing serious going
on there, but it would be nice to have it working. So if you know something
that I don't (everyone does, but I mean about this), then please let me
know. :)
Thanks and best regards,
Rune Jacobsen
(From the Windoze machine, feh)
------------------------------
From: "Buck Turgidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Switch from Gnome to KDE
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:00:01 GMT
How would I go about switching from Gnome to KDE on an RH 6.1 machine? It was
installed with the former, but I'd like to try the latter.
Many thanks!!
------------------------------
From: Stefano Ghirlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Postscript file corrupted - extracting text/patching
Date: 26 May 2001 13:24:04 +0200
"Theo van der Merwe" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
> I have obtained a Postscript file (apparently generated with
> Microsoft Word) of which I can only read the first page using gv
> (an error - moveto - is generated on the next page).
First of all be sure to use ghostscript 7.0. I was using the old 5.x
an I find 7.0 much improved.
> a) How do I extract just the text from the Postscript file? How is
> the raw text in a Postscript file encoded?
There should be a ps2ascii utility included with ghostscript.
> b) Is it possible to fix a corrupted Postscript file (e.g. by
> extracting the usable portions to a new file)?
The utility fixps (probably from the psutils) might help.
I once had luck with file and dd in extracting a postscript readable
by 5.x from a newer postscript file generated some Adobe Program. The
good old file told me something like 'x bytes of garbage at the
beginning, Postscript file from byte x+1 to y, TIFF image from byte
y+1 to z', and with dd I extracted the x+1-to-y part only.
--
Stefano - Hodie septimo Kalendas Iunias MMI est
------------------------------
From: "Oliver Nussbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: strange partition problem
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:42:48 +0200
Hi,
Though I was searching the web for solutions
I couldnt fix the following problem
and I hope someone can help me:
Win98 SE and RedHat 7.0 on a 20 GB HDD:
partition table as follows:
/dev/hda1 | * | 1 | 255 | 2048256 | b | Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 | | 256 | 258 | 24097+ | 83 | Linux
/dev/hda3 | | 259 | 2432 | 17462655 | 5 | Erweiterte
/dev/hda5 | | 259 | 1023 | 6144831 | 83 | Linux
/dev/hda6 | | 1024 | 1040 | 136521 | 82 | Linux(Swap)
/dev/hda7 | | 1041 | 2432 | 11181208+| b | Win95FAT32
until now everything was fine, except sometimes the
extended fat32 got messed up and D: wasn't displayed anymore
in win98.
I could fix the problem easy with linux fdisk and
everything worked fine again.
But last time, after I did some work with emacs and
created some files,
D: is still displayed in win98 explorer,
but I cant get access to the drive.
Size of drive is: 0 Byte in Explorer. (like it wouldn't be formatted)
Meanwhile I recreated the partition table (deleted it and
rewrote it....)
Didn't change anything.
The partition table should be ok but the problem still there.
Would be great if someone could help me, because I need
the data form D: and forgot to backup :(
Thanks very much
Oliver
------------------------------
From: Morgoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SSH problems
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:12:29 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello people. I have a problem with SSH. I'm not sure that it's a problem
of SSH or my Lin box.
I installed the SSH server and clients and did all the necessary to get it
up with keys and so on.
When i connect to the ssh server i get the following error (ssh -v -l
acocunt ip)
Connecting to ****** [*****] port 22.
debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 0/0 (e=0)
debug1: restore_uid
debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 0/0 (e=0)
debug1: connect: No buffer space available
debug1: restore_uid
Secure connection to 217.128.44.125 refused.
and when i look /var/log/messages i get
May 26 14:01:48 Morgoth kernel: neighbour table overflow
May 26 14:01:51 Morgoth last message repeated 3 times
It seems that the problem comes from this buffer overflow.
Any one has an idea what it is ?
I'm using Mandrake 7.2 (kernel 2.2.17mdk ) and i have also Guarddog for
firewall in wich i allowed ssh.
I have of course started sshd, but no inetd since there is no input for ssh.
thanks for any response
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:56:45 +0200
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user
Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
>
> Michael Heiming wrote on Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 22:37:
>
> > poll <servername> with protocol <POP3> user <username> password
> > <password> is <localuser>
>
> Thanks, but my problem is slightly different:
>
> I have one mailbox. In this mailbox are mails to different e-mail
> addresses. (They came in e.g. through forwarding from another mailbox.) The
> different mails must be delivered to the appropriate local mailbox:
>
> Example:
>
> ISP mailbox -> must be delivered to local mailbox
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> thorn@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> john@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> susanne@localhost
>
> The only common thing between the mails in my ISP's mailbox and my local
> onces is the name before the @ sign.
>
> I would like to use sendmail's (postfix) multidrop feature. This is my
> entry:
>
> *****
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] there with password mysecret is * here
> options fetchall stripcr
> mda '/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -f %F %T'
> *****
>
> The only problem is that fetchmail inserts the whole e-mail address
> (including domain) to %T in the mda line.
>
> How can I tell fetchmail just to insert the user name (= name before the @
> sign) into %T, so that sendmail will be able to deliver it to the
> appropriate user?
>
> Any ideas??
>
> Thanks a lot!!
> Claus
Ah, one mailbox --> multiple localuser.
I would use procmail for something like this, poll all to one user,
setup
~/.procmailrc and redirect the mail where you want.
"apropos procmail" for all man pages, sendmail uses procmail as default
LDA on Linux, AFAIK postfix does the same.
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:59:32 +0200
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user
Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
>
> Michael Heiming wrote on Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 22:37:
>
> > poll <servername> with protocol <POP3> user <username> password
> > <password> is <localuser>
>
> Thanks, but my problem is slightly different:
>
> I have one mailbox. In this mailbox are mails to different e-mail
> addresses. (They came in e.g. through forwarding from another mailbox.) The
> different mails must be delivered to the appropriate local mailbox:
>
> Example:
>
> ISP mailbox -> must be delivered to local mailbox
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> thorn@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> john@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> susanne@localhost
>
> The only common thing between the mails in my ISP's mailbox and my local
> onces is the name before the @ sign.
>
> I would like to use sendmail's (postfix) multidrop feature. This is my
> entry:
>
> *****
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] there with password mysecret is * here
> options fetchall stripcr
> mda '/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -f %F %T'
> *****
>
> The only problem is that fetchmail inserts the whole e-mail address
> (including domain) to %T in the mda line.
>
> How can I tell fetchmail just to insert the user name (= name before the @
> sign) into %T, so that sendmail will be able to deliver it to the
> appropriate user?
>
> Any ideas??
>
> Thanks a lot!!
> Claus
Ah, one mailbox --> multiple localuser.
I would use procmail for something like this, poll all to one user,
setup ~/.procmailrc and redirect the mail where you want.
"apropos procmail" for all man pages, sendmail uses procmail as default
LDA on Linux, AFAIK postfix does the same.
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Perry)
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.5 crashes on Mandrake 8 but 2.4.4 and 2.4.3 works
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:09:06 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 26 May 2001 07:03:28 GMT, Jim Brooks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.5 on Mandrake 8 crashed my PC early in boot,
> when the swapper process was being started (I think).
>
> The default 2.4.3 kernel boots OK, and so does a 2.4.4 kernel
> I built myself (had to update /boot/initrd*.img with 2.4.4's reiserfs.o).
>
> Anyone else having problems with 2.4.5?
>
>
> --
> Jim Brooks jjiimm-AT-jjiimmbbrrookkss-DOT-oorrgg
>
>
>
I just did the 2.4.5 thing on two athlon thunderbirds I have with good
results overall. I seemed to sense some memory issues with 2.4.4. These
machines have 384 and 256mb of memory and with 2.4.4, I got the feeling that
the systems were having some problems. I can't say how much its improved,
but 2.4.5 seems better at a subjective level.
--
Michael Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================
------------------------------
From: "DMcBee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISP backbone
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:31:41 -0400
I'm on my ISP's T1 backbone with a Win98 box ( nyah,nyah!) and I've just
recently set it up to dual boot to RH 6.2. The problem is that I'm having
trouble getting the ethernet interface to work. My IP#, DNS & gateway are
all set correctly, but I can't ping anything outside of my own address range
( ie, my IP is 1.2.3.4 - I can ping 1.2.3.x, but nothing else). ifconfig
says the eth0 is running.
What other settings am I overlooking? Also, it hangs for awhile when
starting sendmail ( I'm assuming because it can't find the nameservers ).
Drew
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Svend Olaf Mikkelsen)
Subject: Re: strange partition problem
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:19:21 GMT
"Oliver Nussbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>/dev/hda1 | * | 1 | 255 | 2048256 | b | Win95 FAT32
>/dev/hda2 | | 256 | 258 | 24097+ | 83 | Linux
>/dev/hda3 | | 259 | 2432 | 17462655 | 5 | Erweiterte
>/dev/hda5 | | 259 | 1023 | 6144831 | 83 | Linux
>/dev/hda6 | | 1024 | 1040 | 136521 | 82 | Linux(Swap)
>/dev/hda7 | | 1041 | 2432 | 11181208+| b | Win95FAT32
If data currently is lost, you should not write to the disk at all
until the exact nature of the problem is known.
The cause of the problem is that the type of the extended partition is
wrong. It should be 0F.
--
Svend Olaf
------------------------------
From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP formated drive
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:22:08 GMT
Robert writes:
> Anyway, someone here will probably know a better way using linux.
If _all_ you did was delete a partition or alter the partition table in
some way you can recover your data by simply recreating the partition with
Linux fdisk. Messing with the partition table does not touch the data in
the partition.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 23:39:26 +1000
From: faeychyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: permission confusion
faeychyld wrote:
>
> Permissions always throw me a curve. I thought
> if I mounted a drive ( ls120 n this case )
> with the user option eg; fstab entry
>
> /dev/hdd /mnt/ls120 auto noauto,user,rw 0 0
>
> then I would own the drive and have rw access.
> Not so, the drive is still owned by root with 777 permissions.
>
> Where have I gone wrong?
>
> --
> -
> -
> -
> Regards F
A report error!! The ls120 mount point without the drive mounted had
permissions
0777 because I su'ed to root and changed so.
When the drive was mounted it became 0755, but after leaving the
machine alone for a few hours the permission of the mount point
is now 0777, drive mounted or not.
Rebooting has not changed this. This is possibly quite normal
behaviour, but quite bizzare to a reasonably new linux user.
--
-
-
-
Regards F
------------------------------
From: Ian Northeast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISP backbone
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:43:46 +0100
DMcBee wrote:
>
> I'm on my ISP's T1 backbone with a Win98 box ( nyah,nyah!) and I've just
> recently set it up to dual boot to RH 6.2. The problem is that I'm having
> trouble getting the ethernet interface to work. My IP#, DNS & gateway are
> all set correctly, but I can't ping anything outside of my own address range
> ( ie, my IP is 1.2.3.4 - I can ping 1.2.3.x, but nothing else). ifconfig
> says the eth0 is running.
> What other settings am I overlooking?
Default route by the look of it. GATEWAY= in /etc/sysconfig/network, if
you are not a DHCP client.
> Also, it hangs for awhile when
> starting sendmail ( I'm assuming because it can't find the nameservers ).
Yes, it cannot resolve its own address. Sendmail wants to do this unless
you tell it otherwise.
Regards, Ian
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Subject: Re: permission confusion
Reply-To: bobh = haucks dot org
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:44:02 GMT
On Sat, 26 May 2001 19:58:10 +1000, faeychyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Permissions always throw me a curve. I thought
> if I mounted a drive ( ls120 n this case )
> with the user option eg; fstab entry
>
> /dev/hdd /mnt/ls120 auto noauto,user,rw 0 0
>
> then I would own the drive and have rw access.
Not necessarily. That must means you can mount it without being root.
> Not so, the drive is still owned by root with 777 permissions.
What filesystem is on the ls120? Sounds like it might be FAT or VFAT.
Those don't grok permissions or ownership, so the kernel fakes them when
you mount the drive.
Look at the mount man page for info on the "uid", "gid", and "umask"
options.
Also, the mtools allow you to manipulate FAT disks without mounting
them. There are analogs of the usual DOS commands, prefixed by "m", as
in "mdir b:", "mcopy a:file file". Very handy. See "man mtools".
--
-| Bob Hauck
-| To Whom You Are Speaking
-| http://www.haucks.org/
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 23:42:01 +1000
From: faeychyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Switch from Gnome to KDE
Buck Turgidson wrote:
>
> How would I go about switching from Gnome to KDE on an RH 6.1 machine? It was
> installed with the former, but I'd like to try the latter.
>
> Many thanks!!
I think you have to use something like
switch or switchdesk kde, I have seen this
reported but not payed any real attention,
sorry.
--
-
-
-
Regards F
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 23:49:43 +1000
From: faeychyld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP formated drive
Douglas Gouty wrote:
>
> HELP...
>
> I have accidentally formatted one of my data drives.
>
> I was doing a reinstall of SUSE 7.0 to a new ATA-100 drive and still had
> one of my data drives attached. I was watching TV while I was selecting
> partitions and formatting and accidentally selected my data partition as
> well. As soon as it hit the data drive I noticed it and killed the power.
> Not quick enough though. <arrrggg> So I have lost some very important
> account and contact data that had not been backed up as recent as I had
> hoped. I am looking for some utilities to recover from the partial format.
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Doug
You might read " man mke2fs " refer to option "-S"
and "man e2fsck" refer to option "-b"
You never know!!!
I know, I wish I had tried them.
bon chance
--
-
-
-
Regards F
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 16:03:24 +0200
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fetchmail + deliver to several local user
Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
>
> Michael Heiming wrote on Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 22:37:
>
> > poll <servername> with protocol <POP3> user <username> password
> > <password> is <localuser>
>
> Thanks, but my problem is slightly different:
>
> I have one mailbox. In this mailbox are mails to different e-mail
> addresses. (They came in e.g. through forwarding from another mailbox.) The
> different mails must be delivered to the appropriate local mailbox:
>
> Example:
>
> ISP mailbox -> must be delivered to local mailbox
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> thorn@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> john@localhost
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> susanne@localhost
>
> The only common thing between the mails in my ISP's mailbox and my local
> onces is the name before the @ sign.
>
> I would like to use sendmail's (postfix) multidrop feature. This is my
> entry:
>
> *****
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] there with password mysecret is * here
> options fetchall stripcr
> mda '/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -f %F %T'
> *****
>
> The only problem is that fetchmail inserts the whole e-mail address
> (including domain) to %T in the mda line.
>
> How can I tell fetchmail just to insert the user name (= name before the @
> sign) into %T, so that sendmail will be able to deliver it to the
> appropriate user?
>
> Any ideas??
>
> Thanks a lot!!
> Claus
Ah, one mailbox --> multiple localuser.
I would use procmail for something like this, poll all to one user,
setup ~/.procmailrc and redirect the mail where you want.
"apropos procmail" for all man pages, sendmail uses procmail as default
LDA on Linux, AFAIK postfix does the same.
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
From: "Guus Ellenkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pci modem driver (LT) for Linux wanted
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 15:58:49 +0200
How to install modem driver for LT pci modem?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
