On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 23:55:33 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, shouldn't both the actually applied size and the true size be displayed? > e.g. > > ret=0x5 (in 8 bytes, true size: 16 bytes) I have to ask. Why do we care? Is there a use for this information? If not, ret=0x5 would be sufficient. -- Steve
