On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 12:36:06 -0400 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 23:55:33 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hmm, shouldn't both the actually applied size and the true size be > > displayed? > > e.g. > > > > ret=0x5 (in 8 bytes, true size: 16 bytes) > > I have to ask. Why do we care? Is there a use for this information? If the structure itself is being returned, representing it as a scalar value could lead to misunderstandings. Since we can check it is a scalar or not, it should be noticed. In this meaning, I think "(trunc)" is also good to me. (at least user can notice it) Thanks, > > If not, ret=0x5 would be sufficient. > > -- Steve > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
