On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 8:30 AM Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 08:48:08 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have to ask. Why do we care? Is there a use for this information? > > > > If the structure itself is being returned, representing it as a scalar > > value could lead to misunderstandings. Since we can check it is a > > scalar or not, it should be noticed. In this meaning, I think "(trunc)" > > is also good to me. (at least user can notice it) > > OK, after thinking about this more, I agree that "(trunc)" is the better > option.
Thanks, I will keep using "(trunc)" in v6. > > -- Steve
