On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:06:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:13:23AM -0500, Al Borchers wrote: > > How about io_edgeport and io_ti driver bug fixes and > > enhancements for 2.4--are you still interested in > > such patches? > > Of course, as long as you also provide 2.6 patches first :)
Speaking of which, I'm getting a lot of complaints from users of the latest devices that they do not work with the current kernel code. It looks like you and Peter are offering up a kernel patch to help some people with this. Care to send it to me, as I am getting tired of telling everyone to go bug IO Networks as I don't know anything about these new devices. Or can I just replace the version of io_fw_down3.h with the version in your patch tarball with no problems? I really don't need the new ring-buffer changes for people to just get their devices to work... thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel