On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:06:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:13:23AM -0500, Al Borchers wrote:
> > How about io_edgeport and io_ti driver bug fixes and
> > enhancements for 2.4--are you still interested in
> > such patches?
> 
> Of course, as long as you also provide 2.6 patches first :)

Speaking of which, I'm getting a lot of complaints from users of the
latest devices that they do not work with the current kernel code.  It
looks like you and Peter are offering up a kernel patch to help some
people with this.

Care to send it to me, as I am getting tired of telling everyone to go
bug IO Networks as I don't know anything about these new devices.

Or can I just replace the version of io_fw_down3.h with the version in
your patch tarball with no problems?  I really don't need the new
ring-buffer changes for people to just get their devices to work...

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to