Hi. Jacek Pliszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the standard, complete way, it allows custom patches to the > > kernel and everything else. If the OEM only wants a single module > > compiled then it is much easier. > > I think custom kernel patches in various places is too much. > The focus should be on USB devices. Let's assume that only > one/few modules in USB tree need to be built. This will turn out as a major PITA. Unless I am seriously mistaken, patching the "right" places in a kernel shows up in all other places. rml's preemption patches come to mind (which I happen to like very much!). And I doubt any vendor is going to go through patch hell using a CGI script. I know I would not :) -- R! _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
