Not entirely, we're a large corporate ex govt dept who are still running NT4 on the desktop, haven't upgraded since the 95 days, later this year we're looking at windows 2000, however in our enterprise select agreement which was negotiated when we became a company we've always had windows 2000 client access licences which let us run older versions of NT if we wanted to, there'd be a small but not insignificant cost to upgrade those to XP CAL's.
Given it's taken like 3 years to move to windows 2000 and the cost of updating 700 desktops... I can't see another upgrade on the horizon, plus theres no way anyone here could stomach running XP ;-) I guess what I'm trying to say is that big organisations move very slowly and very carefully, upgrading is not something that happens too often and when it does if you've had some forethought theres only the labour cost involved. jeremyb. > From: Vik Olliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/03/18 Mon PM 09:08:21 GMT+12:00 > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Stuff article etc. > > Yes, don't forget that it has to be re-acquired again and again as > versions change. > > Vik :v) > -- > /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /"\ > \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign One of The Olliver Family \ / > X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://olliver.family.gen.nz X > / \ - NO MSWord docs in e-mail Public PGP key available there / \ >
