what do you mean "install"

did you compile it?

what is causing the segfault?

have you run it with strace?

It seems you have been pointed to a number of solutions, and not tried
them.


On Wed, 24 Sep 2003
09:31:29+0000(GMT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> > Perhaps Xsane does not set the focus distance correctly...
> 
> I tried reinstalling the redhat 3.2.x gcc experimental version tonite.
> It installs, but soon as I try to scan it segfaults...
> 
> > I installed the latest version of gcc 2.96 from freshrpm's last
> > night, and then tried to install the 2.96 version of Iscan. This
> > time, Iscan installed without any problems - but does *nothing*. I 
> > doubt that the Iscan instalation broke the snae backend setup,
> > because Xsane still works (crappely, but it *does* work).
> 
> Iscan was developed on a box running Redhat 7.2, which looking at it
> is a quite 'old' distro now. That is several point updates of kernel
> behind the current, and also several point updates of gcc behind
> current stable.
> 
> > Oh, I wish the guys from Xsane and the guys from Iscan would start
> > talking to each other!
> 
> Epson would be better to release a totally proprietary Linux driver
> with the scanners...that way they do not need to rely on sane
> providing access to the scanner, which is where I believe the whole
> process turns to runny poo...
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch.
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to