Are the any problems with dual boot, windows + FC2 I saw that there was a posting on /. about this today.
Does anyone know anything about this? On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 11:16, Derek Smithies wrote: > Hi, > Fedora core 2 is going to be a demand. Two things:: > > 1st, 256 meg of mem is the realistic minimum of memory for X/KDE etc. > > Fc2 will run on 160 or so megs, but it will have little "rests" every > now and then. (what I found on FC2 test 3) > > disk space, the new full install is 6.5 gigs. > > Derek. > =========================================== > > On Fri, 21 May 2004, Don Gould wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:57, HHV wrote: > > > > > Welcome back! :-) > > > > Thank you. > > > > > RH9 is somewhat old. Twice replace with newer releases (FC1 and, as > > > of this week, FC2). But that said, I'm posting from a RH9 machine right > > > now... > > > > And how much more deman is FC2 going to put on my hardware? > > > > Are the benefits there to out weigh the next learning curb? > > > > > > > You get the 'K' under the KDE. Under Gnome you get the red hat. > > > > How do I verify that I'm running Gnome given that I selected KDE when I > > did the install and unselected Gnome from the installation? > > > > > Sounds like you've logged in under Gnome. That's when you get the System > > > Settings option. It should first pop up a password box (as you need root > > > access to reconfigure the screen). Then you should get an applet that's > > > very much like to Windows "Display" thingy where you can set the type of > > > card and type of monitor, and then configure to a resolution that both > > > support... > > > > I already tried that and it says I'm already set to 1024*768 > > > > Cheers Don > > > > > >
