I found a really good c++ book at the uni booksale recently (Picked it up for 
$20) It is much more expensive at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/186100012X/104-6266574-2533512?
v=glance

The book is called "Ivor Horton's Beginning C++ : The Complete Language ANSI/ISO 
Compliant 

One of the best things about this book is that it talks about ANSI C++ and does 
not require tools like visual c++ to do the examples.  The Author has also 
written another book for visual c++.

Quoting Carl Cerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> 
> >> Dear Christopher,
> >> Thank you for your extensive reply. Does RUTE
> >>stand for something else; 
> > 
> > Root User's Tutorial and Exposition.
> 
> I always thought it was Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition, following 
> the recursive acronym tradition (GNU etc.)
> 
> > A play on the homophonic nature of 'root' and 'rute' as well as being
> a 
> > recursive acronym. Mad Unix geekery unleashed.
> > 
> > 
> >>I want to know more about this book and where I'm 
> >>more likely able to obtain a copy. I don't mind a used edition and I
> live
> >>near Christchurch.
> > 
> > 
> > Tech books, Whitcoulls. -- Unlikely possibilities.
> > amazon.com -- Certainty.
> >
> http://www.amazon.
com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0130333514/qid=1086733573/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_x
gl14/104-3810111-6221559?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
> > Mail system will probably mangle the above line, just go to amazon.com
> and put
> > RUTE Sheer
> > into the search box.
> > Note the reviews. They are all pertinent. In particular the one which
> reminds 
> > us that RUTE is now quite old, ~5 years. The content is almost all
> timeless, 
> > but there are some things which are now commonplace and not mentioned.
> e.g. 
> > there is nothing about broadband, and a number of now ancient
> techniques are 
> > discussed quite extensively, e.g. uucp, uucico, etc. 
> > 
> > 
> >> Do you have opinions on C++ books with regard to the efficiency with
> >>which one can self tutor. 
> > 
> > No, I haven't any opinions one way or another about C++ books.
> 
> C++ is one of the last languages I would recommend to somebody trying to
> 
> teach themselves programming.
> 
> > I'd suggest starting out with an interpretive language.
> > RUBY is my suggestion, The book I mentioned is both pretty good and
> available 
> > on the WWW. Also the mail-list is really helpful, and the interface to
> the 
> > FOX windowing system is excellent.
> 
> Ruby tends to be one of those languages that people agree how nice it is
> 
> but nobody really uses it[1]. Python, on the other hand, is also very 
> nice, is used much more extensively, and has far more documentation and
> 
> tutorials. Try http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/thinkCSpy/ for a reasonable 
> introduction to programming in python.
> 
> >>If you do, I'd like to know them. Better books 
> >>will probably be, for my purposes, ones that were texts at university
> level
> >>as the assumption is that only those that are lucid and to the point
> will
> >>be prescribed by lecturers. 
> > 
> > um :-) dangerous assumption, imho the number of computer texts which
> are 
> > "lucid and to the point" can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
> 
> Overstated, but by and large true.
> 
> The UoC computer science course teaching C used an excellent textbook 
> (At least, it did when I was teaching it) which is perhaps the best C 
> textbook in existence (No, not Kernighan and Ritchie) for learning C. I
> 
> can't remember the author (King?)
> 
> Cheers,
> Carl.
> 
> [1] Sourceforge states: Ruby(298 projects), Python(3320 projects)
> 
>  

Reply via email to