On Sunday 03 September 2006 23:10, Alan wrote:
> Hi Nick
> Well given time I guess some thing has to seep thru even the thickest
> hunk of wood LOL.
> Now in minicom I did not get an echo back (it showed the user name as I
> typed it in)of the user name but it drops down a line and asks for the
> password to be entered, then after entering that(it echos nothing back
> at all--the cursor does not move)
That's correct. After all you do not want somebody who happens to be passing 
behind you to be able to see your login password.

> I think it says Authentication refused  (or something similar).
There are two things that stuff up passwords for the unwary. The shift lock 
key is pressed - you don't see the password in all uppercase. In ye olden 
days, having the parity bit incorrectly set. I suppose it's very remotely 
possible that that is the trouble.

[ ... ]

> Currently I do run three specialist ham programs which will not be in
> the CD that I got from the States. One of them although it is a PSK
> program and there are a couple of those on the disk,
I had a look at porting a PSK program from windows to Linux a few years ago, 
and came to the conclusion that doing so would be a task of some considerable 
difficulty. I forget the exact details now, but one was that the windows 
program was a huge monolith which took complete control of the sound card and 
serial port. It was a DSP which did all sorts of very high power maths tricks 
to extract characters out of the noise. 

[ ... ]

Alan: I have a very old '486 which is not in use. It's currently set up with 
IPCop. I also have an ISA USRobotics modem which I could put in it. At the 
moment both of these items are gathering dust. You could borrow them both on 
a long term basis if you like. This would give you a reliable firewalled 
gateway on to the Internet for both of the machines in your room. So that a 
second string to the bow if we cannot get your existing hardware to go. I'll 
bring it to the St. Albans meeting on the 12th Sept. 

( I do not want to lose ownership of either, particularly the modem, because 
at some time I might well move, and want a reliable method of getting on line 
using the good old POTS )
 
--
CS

Reply via email to