On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:27:03PM +0200, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> Kaixo!
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:39:15AM -0500, David Starner wrote
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:41:12PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> >> Now all that will remain to be done is to fix 'more' and 'less' to
> >> correctly the resulting UTF-8 encoded output.
> >
> > What has to be done with less? If LESSCHARSET=utf-8, it should handle utf-8
>correct already.
>
> Or simply LC_ALL=xx_YY.UTF-8, it works for me (less 358
> and glibc 2.2.2).
Ah. And since LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 isn't xx_YY.UTF-8, it didn't work.
I take it - I hope - that UTF-8 is the canonical form which every
thing will accept?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
