Quelqu'un avait envoy� cet article mais je ne le retrouve plus dans mes mails (pourtant Gnus ne perd jamais rien!)
http://www.vnunet.fr/actu/article.htm?numero=12178&date=2004-04-05&th=pme Morceaux choisis: 1� R�duire le clivage Java vs .NET �Enfin, les deux nouveaux partenaires travailleront � l'avenir � �tablir une meilleure collaboration technique entre Java et .NET.� 2� Pas bon pour l'Open Source �Pour de nombreux observateurs, l'alliance entre Microsoft et Sun est une pierre dans le jardin de Linux et plus g�n�ralement du mouvement du logiciel libre. Les deux partenaires ont en effet insist� sur l'importance qu'ils accordent tous deux � la notion de propri�t� intellectuelle appliqu�e au logiciel, ce qui �quivaut � une condamnation implicite du logiciel libre.� 3� Compatibilit� entre dotNET et Java pour limiter l'attrait des alternatives Open Sources �En outre, en faisant miroiter une parfaite compatibilit� entre leurs produits respectifs, laquelle devrait se traduire pour les entreprises par des co�ts d'administration r�duits, ils cherchent clairement � limiter l'attrait des alternatives open source.� Et pour information, ce qu'ils ont r�v�, l'open source l'a d�j� fait: http://weblog.ikvm.net/story.aspx/faq o What is IKVM.NET? IKVM.NET is a JVM for Mono and the Microsoft .NET framework. o What do you mean by JVM for .NET? The goal of IKVM.NET is two-fold: * To be able to run any Java existing application ("dynamic mode"). * To be able to statically compile Java libraries into .NET assemblies ("static mode"). Note that you can also statically compile Java applications, but if the application depends on the exact Java class loading semantics, it might need to be adapted. Dynamic mode supports the full Java class loader model, but in static mode there are necessarily some limitations. A mixed model is also possible, for example, statically compiled code can instantiate a class loader and use it to dynamically load classes. o Why this project? There are several answers to this. First of all, it's a fun thing to work on. Second, it just seems obvious that something like this should exist. Third, I want to migrate some of my Java code to .NET and J# and JUMP just aren't good enough. o How compatible is it? The goal is to fully implement the JVM spec and to be compatible with Sun's JDK 1.4 reference implementation. At the moment we're not quite there yet, but many things are working already. Note that this refers to the JVM, not the class libraries. For details on the completeness of the class libraries, please visit the GNU Classpath site. -- ~/.signature not found I'm personally quite happy with one stable release every two years, and am of the opinion that trying to release more will mean we'll have to rename the distro from "stable" to "wobbly". -- Scott James Remnant on debian-devel _______________________________________________________ Linux Mailing List - http://www.unixtech.be Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.unixtech.be/mailman/listinfo/linux Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: chat.unixtech.be:6667 - #unixtech
