On Thursday 11 September 2014 05:04 PM, Nishit Dave wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2014 12:56, "Pirate Praveen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> We have now sent a legal notice to HP on this via Prasanth Sugathan of
>> Software Freedom Law Center and it is covered by Economic times
>>
>>
> http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/software/ishan-masdekar-sends-legal-notice-to-hp-for-compelling-him-to-buy-a-notebook-with-windows-8/articleshow/42219383.cms
>>
> 
> Bravo for this initiative, all who are part of it!

A copy of the notice is available at
https://mediacru.sh/download/FIF_461bKH5T.pdf

> I see some issues with getting a refund and starting a flood:
> 
> 1. OEMs get an OEM license from Microsoft for installing Windows on to
> consumer PCs - the terms may be negotiated, and pricing may be very low for
> a leading OEM like HP (though not negligible) - would the OEM or Microsoft
> be willing to make their pricing public?

Acer America has a refund policy and they mention the refund amount
https://acer.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/280/kw/windows%20refund

> 2. Both the OEM and Microsoft can say that the OS is an essential part of
> the system, as the proprietary drivers of some components will not run on
> any other OS, and alternative drivers may have unintended effects or
> illegal uses (such as SDR manipulation)

Good point. That would be an incentive for us to push for free drivers
(another battle we have to fight) and choose an A-platinum rated
hardware listed at http://h-node.org/ (it lists only a single high end
model that is released in 2014 and about 9 models that released in 2013,
we have to certify more models there. Anyone interested in certifying
laptops at this months' meetup at Directiplex? All we need a gnewsense
or another FSF certified distro live cd, debian live at the moment
doesn't have a recent testing image.)

> 3. They could also claim that it would be virtually impossible to verify
> whether each request for refund has come after Microsoft software had been
> removed completely (and we can't allow them to implement a kill switch)

Acer America asks the user to submit the laptop at their service center.
It will be removed by Acer personnel.

> 4. They could claim that they would be unable to market and sell their
> products without a warranty for performance and quality if they are unable
> to control which OS is loaded on to the PC, and that blank devices can only
> be niche, probably obsolete products

Not a good argument. They cannot get away that easily from providing
hardware warranty because a different OS is chosen by the user.

> 5. Microsoft tax is also the name for the underhand practice where it
> extracts a heavy price for licenses from OEMs that sell more than a certain
> percentage of Linux PCs, and no OEM would want to acknowledge this publicly

Well, its their call anyway whether to make it public or not.

> 6. OEMs rely on quick obsolescence, which is accentuated with Microsoft
> bloatware, to keep on getting your money every few years - Linux makes this
> cycle much longer, plus after sales service harder - so no positive
> incentive for them

I don't think they would make that argument publicly.

> And so on and so forth. Of course, you'll appreciate that I'm just playing
> the devil's advocate here to help us consider what would be the best
> strategy for getting a wider range of devices without a preloaded OS. The
> demand for this option is minuscule, as most Linux enthusiasts would not
> mind having a dual boot system, if it allowed them more choice in how they
> use the device. India, especially, sees people buy these OS-free PCs to
> install pirated copies of Windows on them, thus defeating the whole purpose
> for which many people have devoted huge amounts of energy and time.

Things are changing in many places with GNU/Linux taught in schools.
People know they have a choice and cost of choosing freedom isn't very high.

> Anyway, all the best with the case. I wish you success.
> 
> -nd
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to