Exactly.

Dino

On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Geoff Huston <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think its quite as simple as that Ron. If the role of a service 
> provider is to provide service to its customers then an ISP with a LISP 
> interface may advertise the entire LISP prefix to its global unicast non-LISP 
> customers, but no further. This is in addition to your consideration that the 
> ISP would conventionally want to advertise the specific LISP prefixes of its 
> customers to the larger inter-domain routing space. This is comparable to 
> conventional routing theology: you advertise default to your customers and 
> advertise your customers' specific routes to the world at large.
> 
> We tried this with a similar experiment with 2002::/16 some years back. It 
> was not a blinding success, but maybe there are lessons to be learnt from 
> that experience.
> 
>  Geoff
> 
> 
> On 5 Dec 2013, at 6:27 am, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Dino,
>> 
>> Could you be a bit more explicit? 
>> 
>> Please assume the following operator requirements:
>> 
>> - In order to ensure the customer experience, an operator wants to attract 
>> all traffic from the global Internet to LISP sites that it supports through 
>> PITRs that it operates.
>> - In order to maintain financial viability, that same operator does not want 
>> to attract any traffic from the global Internet to LISP sites that it does 
>> not support through PITRs that it operates.
>> 
>> Do you agree that these are both valid requirements? If so, how can the 
>> operator do this while advertising only large aggregates of the EID address 
>> block to the global Internet?
>> 
>>                                                                           Ron
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 12:18 PM
>>> To: Ronald Bonica
>>> Cc: Luigi Iannone; Geoff Huston; Sander Steffann; LISP mailing list
>>> list
>>> Subject: Re: [lisp] WGLC draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07
>>> 
>>>> Assume that an operator deploys a PITR. What policy can that operator
>>> enforce to ensure that it is compensated for all (or even most) of the
>>> traffic that it carries across that PITR?
>>> 
>>> Through the same monetizing means it does today to attract any type of
>>> traffic it wants to transit.
>>> 
>>> Dino
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to