Hi Dino,
Could you be a bit more explicit?
Please assume the following operator requirements:
- In order to ensure the customer experience, an operator wants to attract all
traffic from the global Internet to LISP sites that it supports through PITRs
that it operates.
- In order to maintain financial viability, that same operator does not want to
attract any traffic from the global Internet to LISP sites that it does not
support through PITRs that it operates.
Do you agree that these are both valid requirements? If so, how can the
operator do this while advertising only large aggregates of the EID address
block to the global Internet?
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 12:18 PM
> To: Ronald Bonica
> Cc: Luigi Iannone; Geoff Huston; Sander Steffann; LISP mailing list
> list
> Subject: Re: [lisp] WGLC draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07
>
> > Assume that an operator deploys a PITR. What policy can that operator
> enforce to ensure that it is compensated for all (or even most) of the
> traffic that it carries across that PITR?
>
> Through the same monetizing means it does today to attract any type of
> traffic it wants to transit.
>
> Dino
>
>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
