At 12:41 -0700 26 Oct 2000, Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'd like to see happen, personally, is that we take list-id and > extend it slightly by teaching clients the concept of > "reply","reply-all" and "reply-list", where reply-list only works if > list-id is set. that, I think, removes 99.9% of the arguments on BOTH > sides of the "coerce reply-to" religious war.... Mutt already has all of those options, and it *is* quite nice. Currently it needs to be told what addresses correspond to mailing lists, and the list-reply command will look through the To: and Cc: headers of the message to which you're replying for matching addresses (so munging the To: header would break this). It would be even nicer if it could happen automatically. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ Though I'll admit readability suffers slightly... --Larry Wall
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... John R Levine
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Aaron Schrab
- Re: elist address or your add... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- PINE Filtering /& Subj... Paul K-
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header SRE
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in message T... Russ Allbery
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header Rich Kulawiec
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header Gerald Oskoboiny
