[ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

[Karl Auerbach]

> The problem, as I see it, is that we are getting confused between top level
> and second level names. ICANN has no authority over second level names,
> IMHO. That is for the top level to decide. It is even arguable that ICANN
> has authority over the top level, beyond obvious name conflicts.

I would suggest otherwise -- a trade/service mark appearing at any level
of a DNS name would be objectionable to a mark purist.

                --karl--



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________