[ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

[Richard J. Sexton]

At 03:17 PM 1/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
>At 02:52 PM 1/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>At 12:45 PM 1/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>What would be an example of a gTLD which would be operational today were it
>>>not for "TM interests"?
>>
>>pentium.sucks
>>
>golly, TM interests are really holding back the potential of the Internet.
>We're going after the polio vaccine next.

Alright :-) for a less flip answer, arguably TM interests apparantly
caused Ira to back down from "5 new tlds, NOW" in the green paper
to "this is ICANN's problem, THEY can sort it out" in the white paper.


--
"To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
says about you" - unknown



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________