[ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

[Christopher Ambler]

>During the IAHC days there wasn't much argument over whether to add new
>TLDs, but rather how many.  It is the pressure from the various
>trade/service mark folks which has changed that situation to the current
>one of immobility (and vast financial value to NSI.)
>
>So, I would agree that the TM interests have stopped there being any new
>TLDs.

It cannot last much longer, for any reason save direct legislation. This is
going to be a moot issue within months. I'd prefer that we set this one
aside and get back to more substantive issues.

Christopher



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________