At 02:40 PM 1/30/99 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>Mr Lovell,
>
>Speaking as someone who disagrees with Richard Sexton on a number of issues, I
>am nonetheless very impressed with the way he moderates the ORSC list (if you
>can say that is what moderating is).
>
>I've NEVER, not once, seen him act in a unfair fashion in that role, and
>has NEVER let his personal feelings affect his decisions, such as when to
>enforce the civil discourse rules, or to forward on "non-list-member"
>submissions to the list.
>
>Richard has always conducted himself with professionalism and fairness in his
>role as moderator of the ORSC list, and I for one think we could do a
whole lot
>worse when looking for a moderator.
>
In which case, more power to him. However, having seen quite a few ad hominem
attacks in this group, and not just against me, I believe the issue is
legitimately
raised. (But likely hypothetical in any event.)
Bill Lovell
>
>----------------------------------
>E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 30-Jan-99
>Time: 14:37:31
>----------------------------------
>
>__________________________________________________
>To receive the digest version instead, send a
>blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>___END____________________________________________
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
