At 01:21 PM 2/9/99 -0500, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
>Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>
>>I'm just tossing this to start things off. It addresses the fundamental
>>issue wrt trademarks. It is an insight that I think we can all agree with
>>at some level. Much of the disagreements between the two drafts are on
>>trademark issues. I feel that it is long past time to resolve them, or
>>admit that it is an intractable problem.
>
>I disagree. We're just talking about the structure of the DNSO at this
>point. I really see nothing about the debate on the two drafts as bearing
>on trademark issues. Perhaps we can defer this until after the DNSO is
>created and operational. -- Bret
At the rate things are going, in the last four years, that'll be somewhere
in the year 2530CE. I'm afraid I can wait that long.<grin>
The big rift, between Barcelona/Monterrey and Washington DC, *is* the
involvement of the trademark contingent. Do you disagree?
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!
