On 10-Feb-99 Mikki Barry wrote:
> Kent Crispin said:
>
> >Your point is completely irrelevant. *ALL* of the discussions have
> >been concerning what can be done in the context of existing trademark
> >law. The WIPO procedures etc are *ALL* things that can be done in
> >the context of existing law.
>
> Please re-read the WIPO draft, Kent. It contemplates MANY things that are
> far beyond current existing law.
His point is that it would be legal to do these things. But he fails to accept
that adoption of protections that goes beyond the protections in the law are
not needed. These SupraLegal protections are far beyond the travesty of NSI's
Disute Policy. I sincerely hope ICANN does not implement these rules, for it
will be a sad day for domain name holders everywhere.
> >It's nice that you are offering ideas, but they would probably be
> >taken more seriously if you became a little more familiar with what
> >is actually on the table.
>
> That would also be useful for you to do, Kent.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10-Feb-99
Time: 12:11:53
----------------------------------
"We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
- Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
