Kent Crispin said:

>Your point is completely irrelevant.  *ALL* of the discussions have
>been concerning what can be done in the context of existing trademark
>law.  The WIPO procedures etc are *ALL* things that can be done in
>the context of existing law.

Please re-read the WIPO draft, Kent.  It contemplates MANY things that are
far beyond current existing law.

>It's nice that you are offering ideas, but they would probably be
>taken more seriously if you became a little more familiar with what
>is actually on the table.

That would also be useful for you to do, Kent.


Reply via email to