Antony,
In message <001301be58c3$979a6e60$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Antony Van
Couvering" writes:
> > > Milton's point is the good one and the obvious one. Chartered TLDs only
> > > make sense if the charter can be enforced. They can only be enforced
> > > under the following circumstances:
> <snip)
> > Doesn't the technical side of it render all of this discussion moot?
> >
> > You have to have a human sitting there and decide, in both situations...
> Well, that's a reasonable point, and I suppose that since .NA has a
> restricted charter (Namibians only, right?), you don't automatically
> delegate names.
This is a matter of scale. I do not necessarily need to sit and push
a button to enter the template into the mySQL database. That is done
automatically anyway.
No, what I mean is the "manual approval" stage.
I am working on automating the registration process further, however,
and probably looking to beta two different robots.
> But I doubt you have to review the applications your entire day. It
> only gets to be a problem -- either you can't afford the labor or
> the service begins to suffer -- when there are fairly high volumes.
But then, you agree with what I am saying, someone has to decide: "Is
this registration appropriate for the proposed domain?"
Even if AI worked, there is just nothing around that can make these
decisions.
el
